1 - Majority of members don't read more than a few words of any homepage. They jump to find a single word or phrase.
2 - Members REALLY struggle to find responses to posts they've made in the past. They forget the category and can't find it. Really frustrating for them.
3 - Members often switch to a different site rather than spending just 5 to 10 seconds trying to get your SSO / two factor auth to work.
4 - Most people make only one search for the answer they want. After that, they ask a question and want an answer.
5 - About 50% of people seem to ask a question in the community and customer support and wait to see who replies first (p.s. this REALLY messes with your call deflection metrics).
6 - Only a tiny percentage of regulars scan the latest discussions.
7 - A LOT of people view discussions if they appear at the top of the page (and there are only 1 to 2).
8 - Average visitor seems to browse a homepage for about 5 to 10 seconds and then click on something (anything!) to feel a sense of momentum. Members HATE feeling stuck.
9 - Members browse top-level navigation first. If nothing resonate they go to search. Navigation options are critical.
10 - Pretty much nobody looks or cares much about leaderboards - even the people on them.
11 - No-one reads the welcome message - unless it shows up as some sort of 'alert'. But alerts are annoying.
12 - Not one person has ever recalled the no. users online or no. posts on the page as something that was on the page after they left.
13 - No-one reads anything that resembles a 'code of conduct'. Although, hilariously, they will read a document titled: "The Five Rules of [community]". Make it sound like Fight Club maybe?
14 - Members LOVE seeing the most popular discussions / articles UNLESS they've seen the list before. In which case they begin ignoring the most popular section. This probably explains why Instagram mixes it up so much.
15 - Members do click on related topics quite a lot - but this only works in very high-volume communities. At low volume, the related topics aren't relatable enough.
16 - If the community seems dead, people are far less likely to ask questions. The 'recent activity' labels seems to be far more important than any static text/copy on the page.
Final thought: Get some usability testing done. You'll be amazed what you discover. If you don't have time or resources, find someone who does. We're happy to help if you like!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1 - I want to share some data from a client we worked with last year where we did something that I think was a little clever to definitively prove the incredible value of their community.
2 - The client was a mature community in the tech sector. Despite the community's size and scale, the community team had been downsized the previous year and their budget was being squeezed each year because they couldn't clearly prove the value of the community.
3 - Yes, they had used the call deflection templates you can find online, but the senior execs simply didn't believe the metrics were real (I've never believed them either tbh).
It's almost impossible to prove if someone a) got an answer and b) would've called support).
2 - Back in July 2017, my colleague @ILOVETHEHAWK left her role managing the FeverBee community to take up an incredible new opportunity @discourse. For various reasons (time/money), I didn't replace her.
I removed spam/replied to a few questions, but that's been about it.
3 - Let’s start with the number of visitors. Things didn’t really change much at first. In fact, the number of visitors continued to increase significantly for the following year. The reason for this is simple; the community was still attracting growing levels of search traffic.
2 - As a result, many #CMGR folks are so busy 'doing the work' they don't realise their communities often aren't making anywhere near the progress they should be making.
They often fall far behind best practices, struggle to gain internal support, and disappoint members.
3 - Often they keep doing the same activities over and over again without any idea if a) they are the right activities and b) if they are actually working.
A consultant should be the catalyst that gets your community unstuck by facilitating a strategy/developing new processes.
1- A while back I worked with a director of community who had a simple policy; on any night out she would always pick up the food/drinks tab for company's IT team.
This wasn't cheap. It frequently ran into several hundred dollars.
It meant she could call in favours when she needed to.
It meant she could get her priorities on their agenda.
It meant she could often make progress when so many other departments were stuck waiting for updates on their systems.
3 - And it paid off too. It paid off in her hitting her performance goals, her community growing, and her community gradually getting more prominence when the roadmap is set for the IT team.
Right now every community strategist should be preparing for the coming recession. If the pandemic is the earthquake, the recession will be the tsunami for us. This means planning for a sharp and sudden drop in your budget.
Smaller team - thus closing ideation, events/activities, and slower speed of moderation/post approval. Likely small drop in participation. No more budget for platform development, staff training, event attendance etc...
Scenario 2: A budget cut of 50%
Community team cut in half. No time for events, ideation, platform updates, member giveaways, or rewards for MVP program. Slower moderation. No ability to fix technical bugs. Sig. drop in participation and satisfaction.