First, it's important to note that I did what any normal human and not a data robot does when they read an infographic, I faithfully transcribed it using machine-reading software to translate it into Excel. If anyone can find the raw data, thanks.
/2
I then sourced school closures directly from gov.uk
This allowed me to create two lockdown periods (<30% school attendance) and open school periods (>75% attendance)
/3
So then I can now plot the prepandemic trend (black), and the lockdown months (red), and the school open months (blue). Visually, it appears that the first lockdown unsurprisingly led to less referrals, and then after that there was a rise.
/4
Then, I created a seasonality model to create an expected model for the increasing trend while minimizing seasonal variance.
/5
Now, I can estimate the variance for seasonality AND trend, and arrive to the following:
Deviance from PREPANDEMIC trend:
First closure: -27%
First opening: +27% (+54% change)
Second closure: +20% (-7% change)
Second opening: +41% (+21% change)
/6
It seems to me that this data shows that during school closures, typically, there are less referrals for urgent mental health services. And during periods of school opening, the referrals for urgent mental health services rises, on top of a background trend of increase.
/7
This also coincides with what we know about PREPANDEMIC trends in NHS referrals - this is the "seasonality" of urgent referrals - with significant decreases seen during Easter, Summer, and Winter Breaks (increases during school months)
/8
So tell me, what do you see then? Is it fair to say that referrals for urgent distress have gone up during the pandemic? I would say this data supports that.
/9
School Closures? well, in the first wave, we saw quite the decrease. This makes sense; it is likely that many services were not sending in many referrals during the pandemic. The Increase following matched the decrease during. This could very well be a "rebound effect."
/10
In the second wave of school closures, there was an easing of urgent referrals once more, and the period of school opening, and with schools open for longer we did not see things improve, in fact, they got worse.
/11
In my mind, this is the continuation of my hypothesis that:
a) the pandemic sucks
b) schools prepandemic AND postpandemic were associated with more childhood stress and urgent referrals
c) pandemic closures have a modest effect, but trending towards a decrease from opening
/12
Notes:
* this is not peer reviewed research
* this is my excel equivalent of "napkin math", doing my best to create seasonal models without using complex software
* because its a friday night
* and these are imputed (not raw numbers)
Limitations:
* Correlation isn't causation
* many things occur on "half months" (ie schools opening mar 8 2021, or summer break starting june 26, 2021), so rounding errors are occurring
* I literally used software to get the numbers. It looks right visually, but small diff poss
* I AM challenging the claims being made that this shows that school closures are the thing causing harm
* challenging a claim is NOT claiming the opposite
* I AM NOT CLAIMING SCHOOL CLOSURES PROTECT KIDS
Alternative hypothesis (on a friday night):
* "lag effect" closures --> more possible round 1 vs 2, parents tend not to ignore serious MH problems
* "noticing effect" openings --> schools often notice NSSI (please do better if calling "serious attempt" though, hope not)
* "trend accelerator" - pandemic exposed weaknesses in failing child MH system. Given NHS expenditure on same this seems a likely and possible co-contributor. I'm betting going mar'10-mar'20 we would see some pretty impressive growth.
*
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People think of *orphanages* when they think of orphans. This leads to the common belief that an orphan is someone with no parental-role relatives.
And commonly, orphans refer to such children.
However, @UNICEF uses a standard international definition, which I too prefer.
/2
There are many configurations of parenthood. In some cultures, it's the "nuclear family" (mom+dad+kids), in some cultures it's an extended family (including grandparents, for example), and within cultures there are variations (raised by aunt, grandma does the raising, etc)
Update for @mehdirhasan@MehdiHasanShow - she did not, in fact, take her obvious problem of mis-predicting seriously: Here are some of her statements and predictions during this time (Mar 30, 2021)
“Yes. I truly believe we're panicking way too much about the variants.” (to be fair, was saying if everyone got vaxxed, the bad outcomes from variants would be less). Ironically, this was shared as a reason NOT to get vaccines or worry about variants.
“It’s an overblown concern that the virus has somehow mutated to a variant that is so transmissible that it is overtaking the population. That is simply not occurring.”
It is about time that national media stop giving @monicagandhi9 a national platform. If her wrong, sweeping statements are intended only for a local audience (they're not, she writes nationally), then she should NOT be amplified nation/world wide.
If you watch the clip again, the pieces selected were specifically NOT local, like statememts on California (the state, not her UCSF area), boosters, WaPo articles about delta. There's more! She's predicted that people would only need boosters once every 10y because immune rxn.
▶️ school stress a major issue for ~30% of mental health crises
▶️ kids rate of suicide 🔼40% on school days vs nonschool days
▶️ kids routinely sharing school stressors in my practice
/2
▶️ my commonest prescription is time/pressure off school
▶️ Kids are telling me during this pandemic a variety of things, but rarely is it "I'm glad to be back in person because it's reduced my stress", and unlike some in this space I clinically work with and listen to kids
/3
A devastating thread in which one of my medical communication heroes is exposed for some of the worst messaging about public health ever. For whatever reason, I will no longer trust her opinions.
If you are ever in a position of power or influence, OR PUBLIC HEALTH, and you say public health must "do the greatest good for the most people" (literally: benefit the majority), you have fallen far astray.
/2
Of course, we want broad benefit from public health policy. It is a good thing to want to benefit the most you can. But, in fact, in public health often our goal is to prevent harm to vulnerable people.
/3