Problem with the @dhume's is this. They do not find attacks by Muslims on Hindus, continuing in today's India, morally repugnant at all. In fact, they don't even mention it since it doesn't fit their script. We documented hundreds of such attacks in the Hindu Human Rights Report.
This is the same thinking that made Indian "seculars" even spin away the brutal murder of Hindu women and children by a Muslim mob in Godhra. Even in a genocide of Hindus they'd be talking about Muslims as victims. Since only that serves the propaganda.
Lol, minorities? Didn't hear them speak up for Jains, or for ex-Muslims, a tiny minority. They speak only for the most powerful globally dominant religious groupings. They know where their $ bread is buttered.
It's not about "minorities" at all, don't fall into that language trap. Ever heard them speaking for the Hindu minority in the US, even when a hate conference is staged against them?
They bat for powerful #ChristoIslam. It serves them.
Link to the Hindu Human Rights Report. Unfortunately, unlike the heavily funded #ChristoIslamic ecosystem, we've received no support to continue this work.
This is why the Dhumes peddle a one-sided agenda. It has big backers.
Got a call from a Bengali Doctor and entrepreneur in the US.
If people followed your ideas on language, he said, India would mount a serious challenge to the Western anglosphere, like China today. They can't afford it. English-subservience is crucial to keeping India in place.
It's not that the politicians don't know these facts, he continued. But what compels them to not act on these? Even #AAP took an about turn (he was an #AAP supporter).
Fact is, this was an agenda of all the Lohia parties at one point too. Each of them succumbed. To what forces?
The biggest attack is the systematic deracination and Anglicization of our education. It constantly has Indians looking to the West, for approval, for theories, for values. This is what makes the culture "aspirational" for Indians. It corrodes self-respect and original thought.
What Hitler did, the Church had done first. Pogroms against Jews were common in Christendom. Pope Innocent II ordered Jews to wear Yellow Badges. Hitler simply copied.
Hitler is a product of Europe Christianity. They've spent a lot spinning this away.
When Hitler criticizes Christianity for becoming "weak", it is an internal criticism, of someone concerned about this. He wants Christianity restored to its glorious fanaticism, to shed the weakness which has come upon it.
"India" was not fighting. The brutal British regime, which. controlled India, and killed millions of Indians in engineered famines, and looted $ trillions to impoverish the Indian people was fighting.
It had gotten Indian soldiers to fight its wars. They were not "volunteers."
This collaborator talks about "returning" 1 lakh pounds, but would never ask his White masters to return the trillions of pounds they looted from India. Such gratitude for slavery. But then, it's @ndtv.
In collaboration with the INA Trust, @GarudaPrakashan released this book on Netaji with primary documents from British records regarding India's independence.
The men vs women binary is an import from the West.
Dharmic/indigenous societies are built on harmony. Abrahamism on binaries of God-Satan, believer-disbeliever. This divides into binaries, right vs left, men vs women and so on.
The colonial state's need to "fix" society is internalized by the "Right" and Left. Thus there is consensus for more and more draconian laws to "civilize 'those' people" so we can be free of colonial shame. Discussion with @madhukishwar.