Tiho Brkan Profile picture
Feb 7 6 tweets 2 min read
Wisdom is often invisible in life and investing because we want to remove or subtract undesired outcomes.

“I have used all my life a wonderfully simple heuristic: charlatans are recognizable in that they will give you positive advice, and only positive advice.” — Nassim Taleb
I don't tweet often about wonderful ideas we will throw our hard-earned capital into because the majority of the opportunities are not wonderful.

Instead, we try to subtract actions that we are more certain are wrong or undesired, instead of adding actions we think are right.
To paraphrase Einstein, geniuses attempt to solve complicated problems, while the wise avoid them.

Let's face it: there is nothing more complicated than predicting the future in the world of investment.

Charlatans have all of the answers: what to buy & where to invest.
Wise investors who have been around for a while (let us say for at least a couple of long-term cycles if not longer) do the opposite.

They are far less certain of addition (what to do, where to invest, what is popular), but far more certain of subtraction (what to avoid).
Not all mistakes can be prevented & not all traps can be sidestepped but easy & avoidable ones should be done without second-guessing.

That is why wisdom is invisible: when removing a mistake you won't see it as growth in the brokerage statement.

However, it's Buffet's rule #1.
“In practice it is the negative that’s used by the pros: chess grandmasters usually win by not losing; people become rich by not going bust (particularly when others do); religions are mostly about interdicts; the learning of life is about what to avoid.” — Nassim Taleb

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tiho Brkan

Tiho Brkan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TihoBrkan

Feb 1
Netflix’s -50% crash lured me to do a deep dive, which on the surface doesn’t look great. Classic valuations also too high (for me).

However, after I got past some fancy accounting, Netflix seems to have more FCF & NI than it reports (tax optimisation & reinvestment like $AMZN).
Some DM questions, so I'll add additional points. My view is:

• they are probably claiming a lot more in content expenses to reduce their tax bill than originally noticed at first glance

• cashflow statement shows "other operating activity" running at 17.3 billion
• filings show 8.9 billion was predetermined liabilities they had to spend under contract (pay actors & the sets in their own production)

• there is content spending that is needed to maintain the current business, then there is spending which drives future growth
Read 4 tweets
Jan 22
It has become quite clear that the growth stock bubble witnessed over the last 12-18 months, with an orgy of speculation has now popped and results are and might continue to be extremely painful.

$PLTR $FSLY $TDOC $PINS
$SHOP $SQ $MELI $SE
$NFLX $BABA $PYPL $ZM
Read 13 tweets
Jan 22
What do you get when you mix academia of economics, perverse incentives, and the illusion of sophistication (overconfidence)?

You get a crisis with far-reaching consequences (2008) because central bankers don't think in second & third order effects.

What will happen this time?
It is truly astonishing to think just how much worse the fragility could be?

We have a situation patched up by years of artifical monetary policy.

The hidden risk could be multiples of that witnessed in 2008 because the excesses are multiples of those witnessed prior to 2008.
Expect it to get a little worse next time.

"When we bailed out banks that had created their own misfortune [in 2008], we called it a 'moral hazard,' because the bailout absolved the bank's bad acts & created an incentive for it to make the same bad loans again." — Eliot Spitzer
Read 4 tweets
Jan 21
I cannot stress enough just how important incentives are. When we look at an alternative asset opportunity, we always start there.

Who is paid what? Why?

Is there information asymmetry and could this be an adverse selection at play?

Is there a principal-agent problem at hand?
Where are we in the capital stack? Is there alignment of interest between us & other parties? What about a conflict of interest?

What’s the fee structure? Are there hidden fees?

“Everywhere there is a large commission, there is a high probability of a rip-off.” — Charlie Munger
As an LP it has been very difficult for us to find the right partners.

Whether we are talking about one-off syndications, alternative funds, JVs or even contracting GC for construction work.

While you cannot blame them, most people seem to be self-centred & short-term oriented.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 20
The difficulties in investing are everywhere, by they are compounded by the pressure to performance (fund management, short-term focus, benchmarking, etc).

The most wonderful thing about being a private investor is having a choice not to participate in those games.
Additionally, with age and experience, one begins to understand just how much of an advantage long term investment horizon offers.

Long-termism is a strategy of sacrificing immediate results, often those fund managers are chasing by next quarter, in favor of far-reaching ones.
The last piece of advice I’ve taken onboard is that the game of private investing — the one without short-termism — is a game of “no called strikes”.

Unlike many other people on Twitter, I’m open to admit just how wrong I have been on so, so many financial “calls” over the…
Read 5 tweets
Jan 20
On the lower end of the scale, small but very attractive real estate deals can be found for beginners which won't move the needle for HNWIs or institutions.

Yes, at the beginning of your financial journey you're going to have less competence, but you also have less competition.
Just looked at the UK deal with a rental yield of circa 17% (going in CAP), with room for improvement of the following:

• bathroom, kitchen & flooring
• painting the whole property
• landscaping improvements

Stabilized UYOC (yield on unlevered cost) could be north of 20%!
Additionally, those who are focused on other asset classes fail to comprehend how RE thrives with leverage (and dies with too much of it).

Such deals could easily service two or three turns of mortgage debt and thus increase the net annual returns to well over 40% p.a.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(