What this man is saying is absolute bollocks, and why someone so utterly ignorant should be gifted this platform is a mystery to me. Yours sincerely, Geneticists.
Monoamine oxidase is a neurotransmitter. In the 90s a variant in its promoter was found in a family of Dutch iterant criminals.
Since then, it became a variant that became the poster boy of the bullshit genetic determinism fallacy, associated in all sort of behaviours, including risk taking in city traders and gang membership.
This of course was nonsense. It acquired a name - the warrior gene - after a tiny study in Maori, which itself was also rubbish. All these studies were hampered by tiny samples and poor methodology. But the genie was out of the bottle.
Then, Bradley Waldroup had his sentence for murder switched to life on the grounds of reduced responsibility because he had this variant.
The punchline? 1 in 3 white men have the same version.
What this fuckball is saying is ignorant, non-scientific and racist. But there he is, unchallenged saying it with the confidence of an expert, which he overtly is not.
I know I sound like I’m always pimping my own work, but there’s a whole chapter on this in my book A Brief History of Everyone Who Ever Lived. Funny how Rogan doesn’t seem to ever have people who actually know their song before they start singing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Following the publication of #Control, my new book on the history and present of eugenics, here is a thread, using only quotations from some of the key players.
It’s available everywhere, but here’s a link to multiple booksellers 1/n bit.ly/3qnUvPf
The idea of population control via infanticide and selective breeding is ancient. Plato talks about it in theory in Republic, and Seneca describes its practice in Rome.
But it is of course Francis Galton who sciencified eugenics in the 19th C, and spent much of his life advocating for eugenics, with the perpetual analogy of agriculture at its base.
#Control is my new book, out today. It’s the story of an eternal human desire, to rule over unruly biology, to control reproduction, and craft people and populations to be fitter, happier, more productive. smarturl.it/RutherfordCont…
#Control is the story of eugenics, and how a pseudoscientific idea was wedded to a political ideology, a fear by the powerful of losing their ill-gotten gains, who latched onto a neonate science, genetics, and bastardised, misrepresented and cheated it to justify their beliefs.
Just like with the invention of race, eugenics was a science in service of politics. An esoteric idea born in the salons and universities of London, Berlin and the USA, but in just a few decades grew to become one of the defining ideas of the 20th Century.
Oh man, I know I bang on about him, but this is just so moronic it's fruity batshit. Peterson has no idea what he's saying. His brain is blancmange. Not the slightest clue about what he's preaching about.
Have I got this all wrong? I'm doubting my sanity here. This is bizarro world stuff. . He speaks and it's just jibber jabber, words have no meaning anymore. AND PEOPLE LISTEN.
Unchallenged too. Not even a whisper of ‘are you totally sure about this? Models are based on real world data, absolutely metric shittonnes of it, processed through billions of permutations, and they make predictions that match real world observations. That’s just all wrong?’
I can save thoughts and replay them in my head already. That is the definition of memory. Whatever this science fiction purports to be is nothing more than a fantasist’s nighttime emission.
You can make the valid argument that the ultra-rich philanthro-technojisms could spent their money fixing real problems instead of low orbit phalussing or this jibber jabber. But also these projects suck attention and funding from real progress.
I have signed this short essay written by evolutionary biologist Armand Leroi criticising Imperial College London’s decision to remove Thomas Huxley from their campuses. Long version republished here; A short 🧵
The content of the letter adequately explains why, and I need not supply further details here. However, here is some broader personal context. I support the removal of Galton and Pearson from UCL’s campus, and indeed was involved in the decision to remove RA Fisher.
I’ve written about this and other historical reassessments of our intellectual forebears in an academic paper, in the mainstream press, and in my new book (link in bio) bit.ly/3pQWacz