Gratuitously involving high profile people is a pretty common form of retaliation and intimidation in academia
https://twitter.com/davulis/status/1491118835822661632
When I tried to make a complaint to philosophy’s MAP and did not drop it after they “adjudicated” it without speaking to me they named me to their ultra fancy faculty board. that DEI cv line to abuser defense pipeline
kind of impressive to get the dei cv line and stonewalling and retaliation experience at the same time 
academia!
censoring the names of the people involved in the incident and not the names of the org leadership involved in the response. was specifically worried about pink being named because they were on the job market at the time
can’t say any of my responses were particularly strategic but i was just really in crisis lol 🥴
dude it was so bad lol but this part was at least also funny
https://twitter.com/christapeterso/status/1265315181581660160
it wasnt the last pain free week of my sister’s life, not severe pain at least. I didn’t really understand how the trajectory of the patients who die usually works at the time
anyway i don’t think people are like “i am going to retaliate,” they’re like “fuck around and find out” and as a response to a complainant this stance is retaliatory
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
