I think the real question is what a post-Trump GOP will look like.
If white power militias, hardcore reactionaries, and zany conspiracy theorists still have a place in the GOP, the problem won't leave with Trump. morningshots.thebulwark.com/p/a-gop-cracku…
The reactionary Supreme Court justices, for example, have shown that they have no interest in saving Trump, but they're committed to promoting the agenda of the "religious right," for example, by taking the teeth from the Voting Rights Act.
Exactly.
The problem is what political scientist @dziblatt
calls the "Conservative Dilemma," which in a nutshell says that conservative economic policies (when presented truthfully) are unpopular so to win elections, they invite in the right-wing fringe.
Right, and I don't think they're willing to do that. Some minority communities are traditionally conservative and, should the GOP shed the fringe elements, could lure them in.
But first, they have to reject the crazies, which means losing a few elections.
Interesting tidbit: The obstruction statute being used to prosecute lots of the insurrection cases, U.S.C. 1512(c)(2) was part of an Act passed in 2002 in the wake of the Enron scandal specifically to prosecute destruction of records that might be needed in future proceedings.
Of course, this is the law so it's never as easy as it seems.
If there is a tricky word in this statute, it would be "official proceeding."
Would there need to be a specific proceeding on the horizon?
The Enron executives . . .
. . . the Enron (Arthur Anderson) executives started shredding documents after an investigation was opened into their corrupt practices, but before a subpoena was issued.
In other words, even if big shots start turning on each other, these people will still be fighting for control of local election boards and local school boards. sacbee.com/news/californi…
Extremists won't give up even if Trump goes down.
They need to LOSE elections at every level.
The extremists, backed by outside money, are working to take over county leadership including local boards.
They want to oust conservatives who are not "conservative" enough. . . meaning they are not reactionary coup-loving extremists. thenation.com/article/politi…
These extremists know that Trump planned and supported that coup and they love him anyway.
They know he supports white supremacists and they love him anyway.
I want Trump indicted, but I don't delude myself into thinking indicting Trump will "save" democracy.
Screenshot so I don't give airtime to people who trade on despair, even though it seems stingy of me to deny people such an easy route to popularity and attention.
Facts:
🔹Nobody knows what is happening inside the DOJ except people who work there.
1/
🔹People who speculate on what is happening based on evidence are, well, speculating.
🔹One problem is distinguishing fact from speculation.
🔹Here's the shocker: Just because someone is a well-known lawyer doesn't mean they are right when they speculate.
2/
🔹Another shocker: Not all lawyers are smart or good lawyers.
🔹It can be very difficult to distinguish legal facts from legal opinions. If you're a nonlawyer, this is harder than distinguishing facts or speculation.
Some things are legal facts. Others are legal opinions.
3/