Trinh Profile picture
Feb 10, 2022 36 tweets 15 min read Read on X
Good morning! Shall we discuss something a bit more structural, although this is a cyclical theme in 2022 across Asia, from China to India and Southeast Asia. Let's talk about #infrastructure , which is the theme of the hour & the next decade🛣️🌉🚆📶⚡️

@natixis @NatixisResearch
Today, infrastructure stocks are soaring in China as hope of government policy leaning towards this sector to shore up domestic demand in sagging growth momentum.

In India, infrastructure has been a big theme & even more so after the expanded budget that prioritizes it ⏫📈.
Why is infrastructure the theme of the hour and the next 2 decades? Simply put: infrastructure is essential for the improvement of the quality of life, production of goods, services and to raise productivity of labor.

Demand for infrastructure is high & will sky rocket.
We published a research note on the rise of demand and supply of infrastructure in Asia and estimated the gap. Let's look at demand. Chart 1 below shows you the rise of population on the x-axis & the increase of urbanization in the y-axis based on UN estimates.

What do u see?
You should see that there will be more urbanized people in the next two decades.

Population: India will add 213m people, Pakistan 81m and Indonesia 45 million people.

In Youthful Asian economies (the ones below ex China) there'll be +462 m urbanites n top of 895 now.

So what?
While Asia, esp India, Pakistan, Indonesia, the Philippines, Bangladesh, Vietnam, China & Malaysia may have a lot of people & even more urban people in the future, the stock of infrastructure remains inadequate to meet the needs of its people currently & worse in the future.
Let's look at roads 🛣️. Did you know that India has more road per capita than China? 🇮🇳🇨🇳 . I think population is a better metric.

Roads are key for accessibility & trade & transport. Everyone has invested in road building except the Philippines & Pakistan.

Let me explain.
We take total road length & divide that by the population at that particular time to see whether road length/hm has improved.

Contrary to perception, India has invested a lot in road building. Most growth is Malaysia, Vietnam, India, China & Indonesia.

But not the Philippines.
The Philippines results aren't shocking as we know infrastructure is poor but it is rather striking in that it hasn't invested much relative to the growth of the population so both the stock & change is WORST (yes, worse than Pakistan).Absolutely & relatively worst at road infra.
That makes me sad because I like that country & its people & so its people have WORSE road than in 2005 as we have more people but not enough investment so stock of road per capital FELL. Let's talk about quality of roads. India is ahead of China in QUANTITY due to investment but
Quantity of roads doesn't account for quality of roads & in trade & transport, expressway matters because it boosts productivity by lubricating mobility.

Expressway/capita: China has invested the most (easier due to centralized gov vs India fragmented) & India worst but better!
Here you can see that everyone has built more expressway per capita in the past 15 years, which is good but there is still a lot of room for improvement, especially for India, the Philippines and Pakistan. Again, Pakistan expressway road infra is better than the Philippines.
Vietnam has invested the most in Southeast Asia on expressway building, & so its stock of expressway per capita has increased sharply and now third amongst these countries, only below China and Malaysia. Has helped its manufacturing & trade competitiveness as exports >100% of GDP
Bottom line about Youthful Asian economies + China roads:
*A lot of investment in road building in the past 15 years, EXCEPT THE PHILIPPINES & Pakistan
*Regarding expressways, China invested most & best stock, almost as good as developed
*Vietnam improved
*India needs more
Actually, they all need to invest more, even China to get to DM benchmark, although close. But most needed are India, the Philippines, Pakistan, Indonesia and Vietnam.

Expressways are key to transport links & trade & productivity.

What about rail?
Let's look at rail line length, we deflate it by population to make it more comparable regarding infrastructure stock.

Sadly, only China, Malaysia & Indonesia have invested in rail infrastructure in the past 15 years on an absolute basis.

Relative to population, only CH & MA👇
How should u read this chart? Orange dots = growth rates; bars are stock deflated by population.

Rail length is where China shines and the rest of Youthful Asia sags. Sad to see Vietnam stock WORSE relative to its rising population as no investment is made so things are worse.
But of course the Philippines & Indonesia are worst despite higher investment by Indonesia as stock level is worse. That said, Indonesia is getting up there & will surpass Vietnam if it continues w/ its rail line push. The Philippines once more WORST in infrastructure stock.
Rail is clearly a sad point for South Asia and Southeast Asia except for Malaysia (Thailand is not included because it is an aging country and we only measured Youthful Asia economies, including China as a benchmark). While China stock is best & increased, still not as good as DM
The Philippines is WORST for road & rail due to lack of investment. Asia as invested in expressways but not so much rail. More needed!

What about air infrastructure? Let's take a look at air passenger/capita. Explosive growth everywhere except Pakistan. The Philippines invested!
Air is key for for trade and transport & especially key for places like the Philippines and Indonesia where u can only enter via air or water. So if it wants to promote tourism, it needs to invest in air infrastructure to get people in & out. Malaysia BEST! Look at Vietnam growth
Vietnam has the best growth & second best in air passenger/capita & China third. Note that we're not talking about quality of air infrastructure at all & just people up in the air.

This gives you a sense that air infra has ways to go except Malaysia. We need more investment!
What about electricity? Here, I don't go into details about generation but if u look at distribution, India has the highest electricity transmission loss! Close to 20%!

Across Asia, the transmission loss has declined a lot to close to the 5% benchmark of DM but not India.
What about digital infrastructure like fast internet? Here we look at fixed broadband subscription per capita & China is best. Vietnam is second and Malaysia third.

Worst are Pakistan & India. This is interesting b/c @elonmusk is trying to sell Starlink to India but hits a wall!
Finally, let's put this all together - mostly use transport infrastructure as we think it is key to economic development & life. We created a @natixis @NatixisResearch Asian Infrastructure Metric putting all these factors together to assess the relative supply of infrastructure.
How do u read this index? First, u know the subcomponents b/c I just explained to u & who's best/worst etc. These subcomponents all have equal weights to keep it simple. And then u normalize the data & sum to get composite.

Best? Malaysia! 🇲🇾 Driven by road, railroad & air
Meaning, he countries here & why investors put money in higher skilled manufacturing such as semiconductor as the infrastructure for trade is better.

Second is China, driven by broadband, electricity, rail & road.

Third is Vietnam.
Vietnam is decent everything except railway (relative to these emerging markets but still way off the mark for DM).

Note that Malaysia, China and Vietnam are the biggest exporters in all the countries included here & good infrastructure is key to be competitive!
Indonesia needs a lot more investment and also India. But the countries that need the most is the Philippines and Pakistan as the stock of infrastructure is WORST.

And they all need more if we compare to our developed markets benchmark.
But that is now. What about the future? We know that supply is INADEQUATE to meet demand of the population now, esp the Philippines and Pakistan. MORE people will be added to woefully inadequate infrastructure!

@natixis Infrastructure Gap = existing supply + future demand 👇
Allow me to explain our @natixis Infrastructure Supply Gap: We take the increase of urban population into 2040 & then taking the existing supply to calculate the gap. Voila, India has the LARGEST gap due to its sizeable increase, followed by Pakistan & Bangladesh. Malaysia least.
In Southeast Asia, the Philippines and Indonesia will have a sizeable gap and also will need to increase investment as its demographic transition will add more pressure on infrastructure.

Note that all the countries below will have a GAP of infra - it's the question how BIG.
Since u guys like pictures, let me give you a summary infographic of @natixis infrastructure gap (note that this accounts for existing supply + future demand using urbanization growth).

For every transport infrastructure, the gap is BIGGEST for India so its overall gap is WIDEST
But it isn't the only one - Pakistan is desperately needing more. In Southeast Asia, both Indonesia and the Philippines have rather large gaps for road infrastructure. Indonesia has a rather large gap of air and fixed broadband. In short: DEMAND GAP WIDE NOW & worse in the future
We want to end on a rather positive note, because all weaknesses are opportunities (India & the Philippines infra). Strengths are also opportunities, as Malaysia is more competitive. The good news is that governments understand this, and it's not just China infra stock rallying..
Key infrastructure projects/plans in Asia, including India's Gati Shakti that includes large spending for roads and railways in the FY2023 budget released. Vietnam is planning to beef up its road infrastructure with modernizing highways and expressways!
Sincerely,
@Trinhnomics

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trinh

Trinh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Trinhnomics

Apr 1
At the Asia Society to listen to Asia’s view of Trump 2.0. Will share later ideas shared! Image
China:

Highly popular in China as he is entertaining as he has made China great again. His pressure has pushed China reforms forward. China has become more resilient and less reliant against the US. Chinese indigenous tech is decent & confidence domestically is highest ever. External pressure has rallied stakeholders around the central leadership for advancing tech & expanding domestic demand. Exports will not be a key driver & infra ROI down. China has benefited from Trump pressure.

Trump has a good story teller for China as Trump has helped the China story. The Chinese is projecting stability in a more volatile world & saying that China is open for business while the door is closing by the US.

DowJones & SPX down while China is up. Nasdaq down & HSI up. All thanks to Trump.
Middle East:

Everything Trump does in the Middle East is for Trump to focus to China. Trump puts on the table risky strategies. He wants to bully Iran to the table. Bombing Yemen is an example.

No one takes Trump seriously. What he says versus what he does. What he says is the maximum. Example is Palestine. The best strategy is to wait him out & Iran strategy is waiting him out & Iran has no leverage except time.

Time showed his hand of not having time. In a hurry.

People are convinced that Trump is going to collapse in six months. So give him something but not in a hurry to give him a good deal.

Considerations. Trump is willing to negotiate with Russian directly. He is willing to play outside US foreign policy. His handling of Zelenskyy is like a loan shark makes it difficult for Iranians to respond to him.

For Iranians, it is not what he tells them but what he does to others. For him to have wins quickly, he would have to pay the price.

He can’t give Iran what he wants with Israel. The Middle East problem won’t be solved easily.
Read 16 tweets
Mar 31
Trump "Liberation Day" is coming & if it is anything to go by like other tariff days, it won't feel "liberating." Why? Because he is front-loading bad news.

It sounds crazy but I have given it some thoughts and here are what I think his short-term objectives. Image
First, we know he has 20% tariffs on China on top of others so we are now got a lot of friction to trade with China, which the Trump administration sees as its #1 security threat.

But isn't happy with this friction to trade and investment and keen to close loop holes. Remember that Biden also increased tons of investment and tariff curbs with China.

How to close it is the question? It requires others to do it. Who are the others? The easiest is Mexico and Canada as they have USMCA, which Trump agreed in 2020 (previously NAFTA).Image
There are clues to what Trump wants from Canada and Mexico in the latest 25% AUTO tariff.

Why? There are exemptions to USMCA for US content and also the implementation of tariff is contingent on them figuring out how this 25% tariff is going to work.

Meaning, USMCA essentially is still in force but only exemptions in USMCA.

But Trump isn't happy w/ current USMCA. Wants change.
Read 11 tweets
Mar 27
I have a thread that I was going to make about auto tariffs but instead, I decided to just read/listen. The Peterson Institute has a good paper on modeling 25% tariff on the EU I am listening to this one by Paul Krugman because, well, he's a free trader and a great trade economist. And most importantly, he's old enough to have some historical perspective. Interesting to listen to him (I am a student of Fukuyama as well) because I think what's interesting is that people of his generation couldn't imagine the world we are in today in the 1980s when they recommended the policies they did.

tradetalkspodcast.com/podcast/206-pa…
If you don't like listening, here's the transcript: tradetalkspodcast.com/wp-content/upl…
So basically, Paul Krugman is a big free trader that thinks there is no reason for industrial policy (IP). Why? He thinks that we are not good at picking champions so just let trade be free.

Anyway, upon reflecting on 2025 vs 1987 when he was peak free trading, he sees a few mistakes of his free trade/total globalization idea:

1) Did not see strategic argument to trade, as in, if u free trade everything away, like the US and many countries have, and produce nothing, and the country that is dominant decides to INVADE, well, that's a vulnerability. In the 1980s, he spent ZERO time thinking about risks of free trade and was a free trade maximalist. Now he thinks that was arrogant (I said this not him - he wouldn't say that about himself) to perceive ZERO RISK.
2) Negative externality of globalization and the need to harness political capture for good will. Basically IP is needed to push a world in a certain place, which means, well, free trade got downside.
3) Downside of globalization is that industries are concentrated so losses are felt acutely in areas that lose jobs.

But he goes on to say free trade is best and IP is not good. Anyway and then he goes on to talk about virtues of IP. Haha!
Read 7 tweets
Mar 20
Let's go to the last part of the Miran's paper, which is currencies (Chapter 4 & 5).

Remember that his articulation of all the ills of the US trade imbalance is about the USD as a reserve currency & also the security support the US has to do (two burdens) that has grown, dwarfing the US economy RELATIVE size.

So let's talk about it. But before we even talk about, we have to go through a bit of economics history, if that is okay with you. We'll keep it pretty brief.
Triffin was a famous guy. He famously testified before Congress in 1959 & predicted the collapse of the Bretton Wood system, which happened in 1971 when the US broke away from the gold-dollar link.

What did he say? Well, simply, that as a gold-dollar reserve currency, the US would have to expand its liabilities as fast as required for global trade. But since it's backed by gold, which grows SLOWER than global trade, then we got a problem as lower rates would cause a run on the gold stock or dollar liabilities > gold stock.

And if the US didn't accumulate fast liabilities, well, global liquidity would shrink as US rates would go to high and cause global deflation.

If you want to learn more about it, see the paper below. The author btw isn't a fan of Triffin so says he got a bunch of stuff wrong and whatever he got right, it was probably not by design but accident.

Either way, he predicted that & got very famous obvs. What else did he predict?

bis.org/publ/work684.p…Image
Btw, the key reason the BIS author said Triffin was wrong/flukey is that dude didn't account for Euro dollar or USD outside the US (note at the time it was mostly Europe that held that hence the name & also the EUR was not even conceived although Charles de Gaulle was already pissed off about the dollar privilege & coined "exorbitant privilege phrase) so his timing of the "crash" was off. Either way, he was right for something and maybe it would have been different but either way, 1971, Nixon called the dollar-gold thing off.

Anyway, Triffin and went on to modify things because now we are no longer a USD-gold FX but just well, USD fiat currency.

So he now has a current account version of Triffin (btw, there's also a fiscal Triffin too). Let's talk about his current account idea.

He basically says this, well, as reserve FX or KING DOLLAR, the USD liquidity or USD liabilities will need to grow at the rate of global growth, which would lead to persistent current account DEFICIT.

Well, voila, the US did run since 1980s current account deficits (see graph from Miran's note).

Why? Well, it strengthens the USD and makes imports cheaper than exports + other countries' mercantilitic policy that makes them devalue their FX relative to their trade position.

BIS provides a bunch of counter arguments of why Triffin was off so read that but I won't summarize because, well, the point is to read the Miran paper and not why Triffin might be right for the wrong reasons.

Btw, the whole Triffin thing is about eventually, that things would become unsustainable.

But of course, BIS paper disagrees and say, well, FX would readjust and rates would adjust.Image
Image
Read 15 tweets
Mar 19
Okay, let's talk about Trump end game. To do that, let's read Stephen Miran's "A User's Guide to Restructuring the Global Trading System" together.

Note that there's a disclaimer that this is not a policy advocacy but catalog of tools available for them to "reshape the global trading system."
hudsonbaycapital.com/documents/FG/h…
Trump has been talking about global trade & how he thinks the US trade deficit is unfair since the 1980s (see his Oprah interviews) so this is beef he carries and he has the power to do it.

Trump 1.0 was a test case and Trump 2.0 is going to go full steroid on what he views as the current world order not working for the US. It may work for u, but not for him & his team is going to change it. Here's how Miran is laying it out.
First, the root of all US problems & its imbalances lies in the overvalued dollar. Yes, others lament its "exorbitant privilege" (a French FM said it) but here Trump team & also corroborated by many economists, including @michaelxpettis that while it is good for US FINANCIAL SECTORS, terrible for MAINSTREET. So basically Wall Street gains at the expense of the VACUUMING out of US industrial base.
Read 22 tweets
Mar 12
Emerging Asia Braces for Trade War Impact: Losers and Winners of Trumponomics

A thread. Let's go!

research.natixis.com/Site/en/public…
Let's start with the basics. What's on & what's promised/threatened. So far, on 12th March 2025, we have:
+25% on steel & aluminum on everyone (for steel, not new for everyone & just those that got exemptions. In Asia, that's AU, SK, and Japan. Canada & Mexico got exemptions and so did EU).
+20% on China, including Hong Kong.Image
Let's talk about the 20% on China. China is clearly targeted with 20% higher tariffs as well as its commercial ships, of which higher fees of docking in the US are being considered.

China will try to cope with higher tariffs as it did the past, which is offshoring productions to more neutral countries such as Mexico, Canada, Southeast Asia and sell more to the rest of the world as well as expanding relationships with the Global South (e.g. BRICS).

But with widening unilateral tariffs as well as others erecting barriers, this time around, beefing up domestic demand will be key.

Who loses in this tariff for Asia? China for US markets, but it will try to export elsewhere so there is a fear of a flood of Chinese goods coming.

Who gains? Well, it depends but those that can limit the flood of Chinese goods as well as export more to the US & attract investment. In other words, a lot of ifs but winners are possible.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(