Private schools protect inequality. They ensure some kids have a better shot than others based on their parents' money, which in turn, means THEIR kids are also more likely to have a better shot...etc
No charity should cement inequality.
That's why the argument that private schools take pressure off state schools is bullsh**.
The money exists in the UK to give everyone a great education. The fact that the money is concentrated among the rich IS THE PROBLEM. It should NOT be the basis of our education system!
And before the trolls point out that 11 of my 14 years of school were private...🙄
Again...
2 Types of privilege:
Privilege that thinks it deserves it.
Privilege that knows it doesn't.
The former claims the system is fair.
The latter uses its privilege to try to make it fair.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The main flaw in Brexit was not knowing what the Single Market was.
It exists so supply chains don't have 28 DIFFERENT sets of rules to follow: less red tape.
Most people thought it just meant 'free trade'.
So Leavers thought "taking back control" of our laws wouldn't cost us.
But it's not their fault.
The BBC was still telling people the Single Market was a mere free trade area until I got them to change it in late 2018. But it was a little too late at that point.😬
If I'm in crutches tomorrow or seriously injured, it will be my own fault for trying to visually illustrate the stupidity of what I just I just heard in PMQs.
Wish me luck. 😅
This video is why i'm going to bed early tonight. 🤕
1⃣
Here we go... A thread about that Jimmy Carr joke.
Summary: No topic is off-limits for comedy, but that joke crossed the line, because even the reason he INTENDED it to be funny isn't actually OK. But I am worried it's being used to justify censorship in upcoming legislation.
2⃣
If you go to a Comedy show called "His Dark Materials", you can't complain the subject matter is too dark.
BUT good comics handle dark topics in neutral or even progressive ways. e.g. Using it to attack bigotry/ ridicule bigots.
Carr is usually a 'good comic'. But not here.
3⃣
Why did the Jimmy Carr joke cross the line?
He would never have said "Nobody mentions blacks being killed because nobody wants to talk about the positives." He chose "Gypsies". Because anti-black racism is too unpopular.
Romani people & Travellers don't have that protection.
The reason I always say morality should be based more on logic than on emotion is:
A) People feel more empathy for people they identify with.
That's what lets people prioritise the needs of their race/class/sex/religion at the expense of others and still feel like a good person.
Tory MPs don't think they're bad people when they raise national insurance on people who can't heat their homes.
They just have more empathy with the bankers they grew up with.
So they find it easier to justify working people's suffering to themselves as 'protecting the economy'.
Racists don't think they're bad people.
They just don't feel as much empathy for people who don't look like them as they do for people they identify with.
So when they hear anything that sounds like it may balance things for minorities, all they feel is an attack on white people.
He definitely will have made jokes & comments about women that revealed who he was and decent men in his life shrugged them off.
REMEMBER THAT next time someone accuses those calling out sexist attitudes & language of being 'too woke'.
If a majority of MPs in another country voted to:
▪️Outlaw shouting at protest
▪️Change the law for an MP found guilty of bribery
▪️Remove the vote from 2 million people
We'd call it a corrupt dictatorship.
But Great Britain is unconditionally better than those countries, right?