Radio 4 - Nancy Kelley - being asked about the dangers of allowing men to self ID into female prison. There is a balance here? NK - it’s saying a set of vulnerable people shouldn’t be allowed to go about their lives -
But we are not talking about them! We are talking about men who abuse system!
NK - men do abuse women and don’t pretend to be a woman to abuse them. Not aware of this happening
But this has happened! Right that victim here should not be forced to regard assailant as woman
Conversion therapy concern might also outlaw advice to teenagers considering transition - is that criminal?
NK - ban practices designed to suppress or change sexual orientation or gender ID. Exploring should remain legal
NK - gov agrees but EHRC is saying not enough evidence to ban it entirely this leaving trans people at risk
It’s really that you don’t like new set up of EHRC?
NK - we are all coming together in sadness and fear and this needs to be taken seriously.
Good to see that reasonable questions are finally being allowed. Hopefully it is clear that simply announcing your ‘sadness and anger’ without more, is no longer a credible argument.
And you can’t just pretend something isn’t happening and that will make it go away. The problem here is men. Stonewall and all the others will have to recognise that allowing any man to identify as a woman and demand compliance in any circumstance, brings with it problems.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Feels like I haven’t been here in years. Let’s hope you live up to your name. #RaquelvBristolUni
Now the Faculty Post Graduate Research Director 'graduate Dean'. you consider requests for extensions and play a pastoral role - yes and a whole lot of policy related things.
Your role is 'oversight' over students?
it's oversight of the processes - not responsible for a student where there were no issues. Issues need to be brought to my attention.
On the livestream now. Weird to be seeing the Bristol CJC from this angle, but good to see commitment to open justice from the court administration - thank you .
A further 80 pages from Bristol University has arrived over lunch time. It goes to the questions to Mr Feeny and other university lectures - so time needed to digest disclosure and take instructions.
LJ. Fair to say this has been 'sprung' on other side. A mistake on our side. Emails from L T-M to committee members about trying to arrange a date and emails to security. It certainly goes to L T-M evidence. We are very sorry this has happened and accept its a mistake.
The police are out of control. Newport woman Jenni Swayne talks about her arrest yesterday. Over stickers. Held for 10 hours. api.substack.com/feed/podcast/6…
Felt a hand on her shoulder. Three police officers. Said she was educating people about gender politics. She refused to go to police station voluntarily. She tried to drive away in mobility scooter and drove over police officer's foot.
She has splints on her arm. They put her arm up her back and she screamed. She said she was not moving. They got a van. Hardly any room to fit her in. In the end she had to lie on her back.
I am really concerned to see this. A woman has been reported to Children’s Services because she has ‘transphobic’ views and thus may be causing harm to a child who ‘may’ be trans. Why do I think this is wrong?
1. The alleged ‘transphobia’ appears to be agreement with the statement that sex is real and it matters. This is not ‘transphobia’, this is a belief protected pursuant to the Equality Act as worthy of respect in a democratic society.
To say that a parent who holds this belief is likely to do harm to a gender questioning child is as discriminatory and wrong as saying a Muslim parent is likely to inflict FGM on a child.
Here’s how we do it. We continue with a regime of criminal and civil law which protects people against abuse and harassment based on their physical characteristics or quasi religious belief - which is what a belief in gender identity is.
We continue with a regime of protection for people at work, who are allowed a peaceful working environment.
We continue to have open discussion about what to do when rights are in tension - what single sex spaces must be preserved? When are people compelled to use pronouns?
And most importantly of all, we encourage and support children who reject gender stereotypes without telling them that life long medication or surgery is the only option. We create a society where a boy doesn’t have to choose between his penis and a dress.
Particularly the assertion that press exposure must be minimised as the ‘public’ are too misinformed to understand! I think the public understand only too well, is what you meant to say.
But it’s good to see Ryan Grim flying the flag for nominative determinism.