Her "faith" in dead White men blinds her to a nuanced understanding of her own culture.
Dvija is about being born in knowledge, from just a physical birth. Are they restricting the oath to certain "castes"? All can be dvija, not all can be White males.
"Hipprocates" is rooted in the Eurocentric reconstruction of their fabled past in Greece.
Does this "atheist" know that the Hippocratic oath starts with swearing on the Greek gods, and does the "feminist" know it prohibited abortion (and all surgery)?
Of course, the "modern" Hippocratic oath, is simply made up in the 1960s by a different White man, and is *not* the original oath attributed to Hippocrates.
But they are so driven by faith in White masters that inconvenient facts won't deter slave minds.
It is telling that her tweet begins with the word "shameful."
Colonial shame is a result of their education, designed to produce contempt of native languages, culture and traditions. This produces a deep feeling of self-shame—needs psychological study.
Meanwhile, the same ecosystem attacks the diversity of native cultures while supporting the totalitarian erasure of diversity on the Abrahamic "God's" commands.
Problem with the @dhume's is this. They do not find attacks by Muslims on Hindus, continuing in today's India, morally repugnant at all. In fact, they don't even mention it since it doesn't fit their script. We documented hundreds of such attacks in the Hindu Human Rights Report.
This is the same thinking that made Indian "seculars" even spin away the brutal murder of Hindu women and children by a Muslim mob in Godhra. Even in a genocide of Hindus they'd be talking about Muslims as victims. Since only that serves the propaganda.
Lol, minorities? Didn't hear them speak up for Jains, or for ex-Muslims, a tiny minority. They speak only for the most powerful globally dominant religious groupings. They know where their $ bread is buttered.
Got a call from a Bengali Doctor and entrepreneur in the US.
If people followed your ideas on language, he said, India would mount a serious challenge to the Western anglosphere, like China today. They can't afford it. English-subservience is crucial to keeping India in place.
It's not that the politicians don't know these facts, he continued. But what compels them to not act on these? Even #AAP took an about turn (he was an #AAP supporter).
Fact is, this was an agenda of all the Lohia parties at one point too. Each of them succumbed. To what forces?
The biggest attack is the systematic deracination and Anglicization of our education. It constantly has Indians looking to the West, for approval, for theories, for values. This is what makes the culture "aspirational" for Indians. It corrodes self-respect and original thought.
What Hitler did, the Church had done first. Pogroms against Jews were common in Christendom. Pope Innocent II ordered Jews to wear Yellow Badges. Hitler simply copied.
Hitler is a product of Europe Christianity. They've spent a lot spinning this away.
When Hitler criticizes Christianity for becoming "weak", it is an internal criticism, of someone concerned about this. He wants Christianity restored to its glorious fanaticism, to shed the weakness which has come upon it.
"India" was not fighting. The brutal British regime, which. controlled India, and killed millions of Indians in engineered famines, and looted $ trillions to impoverish the Indian people was fighting.
It had gotten Indian soldiers to fight its wars. They were not "volunteers."
This collaborator talks about "returning" 1 lakh pounds, but would never ask his White masters to return the trillions of pounds they looted from India. Such gratitude for slavery. But then, it's @ndtv.