US excess deaths appear to be remaining stubbornly high.
Could still just be a time lag before falling cases generate falling deaths. Could also be excessive upward revisions in my model. Hard to say exactly.
Here's deaths in the rolling 12 month period vs. expected deaths in that period from previous trends. As you can see, our current pandemic is really edging towards 1918.
wE fLaTtEnNeD tHe CuRvE
more seriously, what's actually going on here is as highly-disease-susceptible old people make up a growing share of society, the "potentially mortality risk" from epidemic disease rises considerably.
a big reason historic societies had bad epidemics is *a huge population share was children*, and children die of disease more easily than adults.

but in the 20th century we had this epoch where prime-age adults made up a huge share of the population.
obviously, medical advances were a big part of the story too, but mere shift in population composition explains a nontrivial share of the time trend in infectious disease mortality burdens.
but now we're on the other side of that change and... we have a growing share of highly susceptible people likely to die of infectious diseases.

so infectious disease problems are likely to *increase* in the future.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lyman Stone 石來民 🦬🦬🦬

Lyman Stone 石來民 🦬🦬🦬 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lymanstoneky

Feb 11
omg i had never hear dthis conspiracy theory

but i don't care if it's true

i choose to believe

Fidel Castro is Justin Trudeau's father.
medium.com/@leibowitt/of-…
look, it's just too insane a theory to not believe it. theories this nuts must be believed merely on the premise that the possibility of them being true makes the world vastly more entertaining.
somebody get 23andMe on the case and solve it
Read 5 tweets
Feb 11
google polls no longer allow you to ask any questions about race, ethnicity, politics, sex, health, pregnancy, or religion
this is irritating because google polls are the super-cheap option. for a 1-question thing you could recruit respondents for $0.15 per response, which made it an incredibly good option for doing "tracking polls" of various kinds
but google is making it clear now that their cheap polls are basically *only* for marketing research. that's it.
Read 8 tweets
Feb 11
Nice article from @stephmurrayyyy on demographic forecasting.

My only quibble would be the quote that short-run forecasting is easy. That's wrong. It's often harder! theatlantic.com/family/archive…
*Nobody* disputes that fertility in, say, Nigeria, will be lower 20 years from now than it is today. And while there's disagreement by how much, the band of error is not THAT wide.

But will it fall *next year*? And by how much?

Demographers do not even model that question!
To find guidance on short-run forecasting like that the demographic literature is almost worthless; it just doesn't concern itself with that kind of thing. For that you need economics papers and such, which estimate elasticities directly.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 11
This survey report has some clear typos in it, and the methodology is a convenience sample, so, caveats.... but the cross-cultural gaps it shows in birthing norms are interesting nonetheless. drive.google.com/file/d/1Kn1CQg…
Especially comparing Europeans and North Americans, two groups which should both have pretty similar access to the sampling frame, a pregnancy tracking app.
North American women are more likely to say the father of their child is highly involved in the pregnancy:
Read 9 tweets
Feb 10
in general, when protestors seize public roadways and deny general access to them, especially without prior provision of permits, it is reasonable for the security forces of the state to clear them from those roads with appropriate force.
this applies in the winter of 2022 and the summer of 2020 and in fact it just sort of applies generally.

when protestors seize public spaces and then deny their usage to the public, and do so continuously and without legal permission, they should be cleared.
parks, roads, whatever.

now, if legal authorities are denying permits for reasonable protests, or creating unduly onerous permitting processes, or otherwise denying basic assembly rights, this general rule can of course be suspended.
Read 13 tweets
Feb 10
With the first month of abortion data from Texas' abortion restrictions, we can see that the number of abortions fell.

What happened to births?

Basically nothing.
Now, most abortions are early on, so in principle you'd expect several months of delay before any meaningful effects.
Right now, given the usual timing of abortions, we can really only reliably estimate the share of monthly conceptions which ended in abortions through December 2020. Here's what it looks like.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(