DCPetterson Profile picture
Feb 11 15 tweets 3 min read
The dichotomy between Republican faux-freakout over Hillary's emails (on the one hand) and their non-reaction to Trump's destruction of White House documents (on the other) highlights that Republicans are not hypocrites. They're fascist authoritarians.

Hear me out.

1/14
First, let's make sure we've highlighted the important similarities.

Republican propagandists feigned being aghast that Hillary Clinton had official State Department business in her private email server. They insisted there were classified communications there.

2/14
Republicans even claimed Secretary Clinton had improperly (even illegally) deleted some of those emails.

Turns out, she didn't have anything classified there, and she deleted nothing but private emails unrelated to official business, and she did nothing illegal.

3/14
The truth didn't matter, of course, Psyops propagandists refused to be convinced by facts, and simply continued the fauxtrage day after day and week after week.

I won't mention the 22 MILLION emails that were deleted from the G W Bush White House...

4/14
newsweek.com/2016/09/23/geo…
... many of which had been on private or corporate (not government) email servers.

No, I won't mention any of that. Instead, let's talk about the boxes of White House documents that Trump took away to Mar-A-Lago...

5/14
newsweek.com/2016/09/23/geo…
... many of which were classified (in the colloquial, "above top secret"). And the documents Trump ripped apart. And the ones he chewed on, or flushed down White House toilets. All of which is massively illegal.

Republicans are, of course, silent about all that.

6/14
This has been pointed out as an example of Republican "hypocrisy," but it's not. It's part of a larger and more insidious pattern.

It's not hypocrisy. It's not that Republicans say one thing when Democrats do something and another when Republicans do the same thing.

7/14
Hypocrisy would only exist if they saw the situations as in some sense "the same," as if there was a rule that should pertain to both, but is being applied unequally. =That= would be hypocrisy.

The actual Republican view is far more dangerous.

8/14
Republicans do not see these situations as being in any way comparable. Nor do they see Trump's actions as illegal or as lawbreaking.

You see, Republicans are the rightful rulers. They're demi-gods. The mere laws of Man don't apply to them.

9/14
It isn't that the law restricts everyone, but Republicans are treating their own differently.

It is that LAWS DO NOT APPLY TO REPUBLICANS AT ALL.

This is how totalitarian rulers act. This is how monarchs act. This is how slave owners act.

10/14
If in the future there's another "scandal" involving Democrats and possible inappropriate handling of sensitive material, Republicans won't see a connection to what Trump did. If you draw a parallel, they will stare at you in confusion, with blank, uncomprehending looks.

11/14
Republicans truly don't see any hypocrisy in their unequal reactions to such situations, because they don't see those situations as being in any way comparable.

Republicans have the right to do whatever they want. They are not subject to any restrictions.

12/14
Democrats, on the other hand (and certain other groups--women, black people, immigrants, The Gays, etc.) are =supposed= to be oppressed. Of course they have to obey laws, but more than that, they also need to be restricted in any way the Republican Overlords desire.

13/14
It isn't a matter of hypocrisy, or even of unequal treatment, but simply of the Proper Order Of Things. Racist fascists are supposed to be in charge. The rest of us are supposed to obey--or submit to punishment if we don't.

It's not hypocrisy. It's worse.

14/14
PS Once you understand this principle, other Republican actions make sense as well, such as the difference between how McConnell handled Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland for the Supreme Court, and how he handled Amy Covid Ferret. Not at all comparable, you see.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with DCPetterson

DCPetterson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dcpetterson

Feb 11
I love when I point out Presidents don't tell Attorneys General what to do,

and then pretend-leftists say, "What about Trump and Barr?"

Because they're trying to tell us fascist authoritarianism is the way it should be.

And then I can laugh and block them.

1/4
This isn't the only example.

Also when I say, "DOJ doesn't talk about ongoing investigations," and they say, "What about Comey?" like they're arguing what Comey did should be the example we should follow.

Laugh. Block.

2/4
Or, I say, "Investigation comes BEFORE indictment. In America we don't lock people up until prosecutors can make a case in court," and faux-leftists say, "Well, poor people are locked up all the time!" as if corruption SHOULD BE the norm.

Yeah, but no.

Final conclusion:

3/4
Read 4 tweets
Feb 10
I've noted a tendency for Twitts to say "I think..." followed by meaningless bullshit intended to create distrust, division, cynicism, and hoplessness.

Example: "I think <DemLeader> is compromised, and is really supporting Trump and on the take from Big Hamburger."

Why?

1/6
"Because <DemLeader> isn't doing <X>!!"

Try to dispute that nonsense, and you're told, "It's just my opinion, so shuddup!" which is the faux-left version of "I was just joking!" when you call out a racist on their racism.

2/6
We're supposed to treat a load of horsecrap as if it's worth something, as long as it starts with "I think..."

No. An uninformed, unsupportable, nonsensical "opinion" is propagandistic bullshit, especially if the obvious intent is to tear down the defenders of democracy.

3/6
Read 7 tweets
Feb 8
We keep hearing how Trump does what he wants, always succeeds and gets away with it, and there are no consequences.

All that is false. Every word of it. Trump is a complete failure, nothing he does works, and he has faced massive blowback.

I'll give some examples.

1/10
Trump University was forced to close. That grift had been a big moneymaker for the Don the Con. He was forced to pay a $25 million settlement to the people he defrauded.

2/10
nbcnews.com/politics/white…
Trump Foundation was dismantled. He had been cheating charities, and had to repay $2 million. This was while he was president. You may not have heard about it.

3/10
news.yahoo.com/trump-pays-2-m…
Read 14 tweets
Jan 26
The man who won World War II was not hailed as a hero until midway through the 2010's. Most people still don't know his name. I bet many of my Tweeple do, because you peeps are smart.

1/8
The depth of his classified record wasn't revealed until the 1990s. I knew about his achievements in the 1970s, because I'm a computer science geek and a history freak. And I'm old.

He committed suicide in the 1950s, at the age of 41.

2/8
He killed himself because he'd been persecuted by the British government for something right-wing American fascists and televangelists again want to make a crime.

Some think we might have beaten Hitler without this man's help.

3/8
Read 8 tweets
Jan 23
Oz wants to debate Fauci, trying to put himself (a huckster and a fraud) on the same level as one of the world's most respected medical professionals.

Oz, of course, won't be limited by boring things like "facts" or "data." He would be free to spew mountains of bullshit.

1/4
In any sort of "debate," hucksters use their time to fast-talk dozens of lies per second into a bilge of toxic effluvium, unconstrained by ethics, truth, reality, or even sanity. No rational opponent can respond to even a fraction of the tsunami of mendacity.

2/4
Of course, Oz doesn't want to debate any of the Democrats who are running for the Senate seat he's auditioning for. This isn't about discussing real issues. It's about creating a boogeyman target, spreading conspiracy theories, and selling more swag.

3/4
Read 5 tweets
Jan 17
Weekly COVID death rate by vaccine status and type of vaccine in the United States. The decline in death rate among unvaccinated people since late summer is likely due to the growing prevalence of Omicron.
ourworldindata.org/covid-deaths-b…
The difference between being vaccinated, and not, is particularly striking for people aged 65-79.

Note that Omicron is still pretty deadly. Don't underestimate the danger. (There's no downside to overestimating the danger.)
The difference in vaccination status for people aged 30-49 is pretty striking too. Not being a senior citizen doesn't make you safe.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(