Tiho Brkan Profile picture
Feb 12 18 tweets 4 min read
In Feb 2021 I returned back to @MikeBoyd's podcast with the plan to discuss mezzanine finance in the RE sector.

However, before discussing moving parts of mezz debt, due diligence & monitoring process, Mike asked my opinion on the state of stocks markets?

Valuable thread. 👇
Firstly, those interested, you can listen to the podcast here: businessoffamily.net/tiho-brkan-2

There was a lot covered in hindsight, but those who follow financial markets would have probably found the first part of the podcast either very interesting or too contrarian for their liking.
Here are two key quotes from the podcast, as I was taken in awe of the speculation frenzy in the tech & growth sectors:

"While it's easy to make money today and everything seems to be working, the question for very smart investors is to anticipate what's around the corner?"
"As a contrarian investor, you ride a certain wave until valuations become extreme for you, understanding that high valuations today entail future disappointing returns and so rather, you go and look for relative value elsewhere."

Why did so many investors get it wrong, again?
Answer: poor quality of thinking.

First, they Anchor. When anchored, your decisions will be heavily influenced by the first impression encountered.

Once the anchor is set, you will interpret all new information from the readjusted perspective. We can learn about the...
...anchoring effect, but it doesn’t mean any of us are capable of avoiding it. This is often why assets have investment cycles & most experienced investors repeat mistakes.

From school playgrounds to courtrooms & financial markets, anchoring is deeply rooted in human cognition.
Additionally, there is Confirmation bias, Social Proof, The Echo Chamber & Authority bias.

You probably heard of Confirmation bias because it is the big daddy of mental shortcuts where one selects only the info that supports their preexisting beliefs while ignoring alternatives.
People love a nice & quick mental shortcut, instead of doing independent thinking.

We favor quick decisions and often don’t take the time or energy to evaluate evidence "objectively".

We rarely ask what is Disconfirming Evidence? The other side of the coin? What am I missing?
When a few early birds buy a certain asset, they are doing it at attractive valuations with an ample margin of safety (in case they are wrong).

But as more & more people join the party, we have herd instinct develop, as they buy at any valuation.

Let's call this Social Proof.
All of a sudden everyone is buying popular tech & growth stocks — paying 20, 30, or even 50 times revenues for businesses that are not even profitable.

No one does any independent thinking precisely because everyone around them is making what seems to be "easy money".
Markets are counterintuitive, so as bullish narratives appear near major peaks contrarians muster courage to harvest their gains...

And more importantly, bearish narratives appear near major bottoms so contrarians muster courage to start planting seeds of the future returns.
If Confirmation bias is the big daddy, Availability bias is the big uncle of cognitive errors in decision making.

In life & in financial markets, the easier it is to recall examples or reasons the more probable or likely to succeed people think it will be.

But that's a fantasy.
In the post-Covid world, the easiest thing to recall and repeat was just how beneficial the conditions for "the new economy" stocks were.

The dreaded Availability bias makes sure our decisions let us down, resulting in lost money, because we place an outsized influence on...
...topics we can recall easily & swiftly.

Our subconscious mind tricks us into believing that if something is recalled easily & swiftly it must be important, even factual right?

What we don't like is the hard work of deep analysis — the opposite of recalling something easily.
An overwhelming majority of investors did not & still do not understand the intrinsic value of these popular companies.

Nor do they understand the cyclicality of their revenues.

They also didn't bother studying previous tech cycles, especially when valuations were at highs.
Instead of putting in the effort of developing independent thinking, what most do is repeat easily & swiftly recalled information, reinforced due to the circulation, creating Echo Chambers.

“If everyone is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking.” — Gen. George S. Patton
And finally, what psychologists call the Authority bias: our tendency to assign greater accuracy to the opinion of an authority figure.

A certain person running a popular growth ETF consistently appearing in media? If they are on TV every week they must know more than me, right?
But this story goes way beyond this Twitter thread, one which I hope you enjoyed reading.

Similar occurrences can be seen in the private equity & venture sectors. We also have reckless behavior in the real estate game.

Lessons are rarely learned, so investment cycles repeat.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tiho Brkan

Tiho Brkan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TihoBrkan

Feb 7
Wisdom is often invisible in life and investing because we want to remove or subtract undesired outcomes.

“I have used all my life a wonderfully simple heuristic: charlatans are recognizable in that they will give you positive advice, and only positive advice.” — Nassim Taleb
I don't tweet often about wonderful ideas we will throw our hard-earned capital into because the majority of the opportunities are not wonderful.

Instead, we try to subtract actions that we are more certain are wrong or undesired, instead of adding actions we think are right.
To paraphrase Einstein, geniuses attempt to solve complicated problems, while the wise avoid them.

Let's face it: there is nothing more complicated than predicting the future in the world of investment.

Charlatans have all of the answers: what to buy & where to invest.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 1
Netflix’s -50% crash lured me to do a deep dive, which on the surface doesn’t look great. Classic valuations also too high (for me).

However, after I got past some fancy accounting, Netflix seems to have more FCF & NI than it reports (tax optimisation & reinvestment like $AMZN).
Some DM questions, so I'll add additional points. My view is:

• they are probably claiming a lot more in content expenses to reduce their tax bill than originally noticed at first glance

• cashflow statement shows "other operating activity" running at 17.3 billion
• filings show 8.9 billion was predetermined liabilities they had to spend under contract (pay actors & the sets in their own production)

• there is content spending that is needed to maintain the current business, then there is spending which drives future growth
Read 4 tweets
Jan 22
It has become quite clear that the growth stock bubble witnessed over the last 12-18 months, with an orgy of speculation has now popped and results are and might continue to be extremely painful.

$PLTR $FSLY $TDOC $PINS
$SHOP $SQ $MELI $SE
$NFLX $BABA $PYPL $ZM
Read 13 tweets
Jan 22
What do you get when you mix academia of economics, perverse incentives, and the illusion of sophistication (overconfidence)?

You get a crisis with far-reaching consequences (2008) because central bankers don't think in second & third order effects.

What will happen this time?
It is truly astonishing to think just how much worse the fragility could be?

We have a situation patched up by years of artifical monetary policy.

The hidden risk could be multiples of that witnessed in 2008 because the excesses are multiples of those witnessed prior to 2008.
Expect it to get a little worse next time.

"When we bailed out banks that had created their own misfortune [in 2008], we called it a 'moral hazard,' because the bailout absolved the bank's bad acts & created an incentive for it to make the same bad loans again." — Eliot Spitzer
Read 4 tweets
Jan 21
I cannot stress enough just how important incentives are. When we look at an alternative asset opportunity, we always start there.

Who is paid what? Why?

Is there information asymmetry and could this be an adverse selection at play?

Is there a principal-agent problem at hand?
Where are we in the capital stack? Is there alignment of interest between us & other parties? What about a conflict of interest?

What’s the fee structure? Are there hidden fees?

“Everywhere there is a large commission, there is a high probability of a rip-off.” — Charlie Munger
As an LP it has been very difficult for us to find the right partners.

Whether we are talking about one-off syndications, alternative funds, JVs or even contracting GC for construction work.

While you cannot blame them, most people seem to be self-centred & short-term oriented.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 20
The difficulties in investing are everywhere, by they are compounded by the pressure to performance (fund management, short-term focus, benchmarking, etc).

The most wonderful thing about being a private investor is having a choice not to participate in those games.
Additionally, with age and experience, one begins to understand just how much of an advantage long term investment horizon offers.

Long-termism is a strategy of sacrificing immediate results, often those fund managers are chasing by next quarter, in favor of far-reaching ones.
The last piece of advice I’ve taken onboard is that the game of private investing — the one without short-termism — is a game of “no called strikes”.

Unlike many other people on Twitter, I’m open to admit just how wrong I have been on so, so many financial “calls” over the…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(