THIS JUST IN: My latest for @RollingStone on #AmirLocke and how right now, continuing the failed efforts to “fix” policing in America feels insane, what’s needed is radical and systemic change. rollingstone.com/culture/cultur…
Writing & researching on the failures of police reform has changed my entire perspective on it. In order to believe in police reform, you have to trust the police.
You literally have to believe they want to change, reflect, and do better.
Everything they've done say otherwise.
At this point, I now see police reform as a huge grift that is all about trying to control the public's rightful rage against the police state -- and tamper down any imagination for something better and more accountable.
I say grift because at this point -- politicians, police unions, police reform organizations are literally in bed with each other profiting off of giving people a fake belief that change is coming.
It's not with them. They aren't going to fix a damn thing.
The look and feel of change gets compromised everytime these parties get involved.
Policies/laws get watered down -- and then there are no strong consequences for those who violate.
Sure, a couple bad apples get fired -- but the whole tree was rotten from the start.
The situation in Minneapolis right now is a textbook example of why police reform is a sham. We have now seen in real-time how all of this is nothing but broken promises, lies, and the same trauma-pimping we've gotten familiar with each time. Seriously, let's break this down.
Step 1: The police tragically kill someone in a manner that sparks instant public outcry and protest.
Amir Locke's death is currently that tragedy happening in Minneapolis right now.
Step 2: City officials then claim they will look into the matter, which leads to them bringing outside reformers into the mix. (Cue the “spoke with civil rights leaders” PR plug.)
Mayor Jacob Frey has called in Campaign Zero's DeRay Mckesson to help advise on no-knock policy.
Step 3: This inspires a policy proposal that eventually gets watered down due to politics.
For example, the original "Breonna's Law" in Kentucky called for a ban on ALL no-knocks, but then it got changed to restricts, not bans, the use of no-knock warrants in certain situations.
Step 4: This weakening unfortunately helps the bill get approved and implemented so that reformists, politicians, and their ilk can call it a victory.
DeRay Mckesson and others have since taken credit for the "success" of having Breonna's Law passed in Kentucky.
Step 5: That is, until the loophole built into the toothless policy gets taken advantage of by the police — causing this cycle to repeat itself yet again.
For example, DeRay is back in Minneapolis again because Mayor Jacob Frey lied to the people about banning no-knocks.
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey is bringing in a police reformist such as DeRay Mckesson, who has no respectable ties to local activists on the ground, to attempt to solve a no-knock policy that isn't going to actually address the root of the issue.
Read the room.
Seriously, people reform organizations like Campaign Zero, that's currently being led by DeRay, are respectable cushions for politicians like Minneapolis Jacob Frey to use as a talking point to claim he's "seriously looking into these issues."
Bullshit. He's buying time.
I used to wonder how do groups and individuals like Campaign Zero and DeRay justify being tokenized in this way.
Then I see how much money and visibility they are getting paid to do this "work" and then it clicks.
They are invested in perpetuating the problem to stay employed.
Police reform allows for organizations, leaders, and police to stay in business.
Police fuck up, politicians speak out, reformists create action plans, and the cycle continues.
Who is actually losing? The community, the people.
For example, with Breonna's Law, the gig was already up when I saw that Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear was a Democrat that was backed by the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) -- the biggest police union in America.
A police-union backed politician will never be aggressive on reform.
To be clear, it took me many years to see and recognize this in my own city (Philly). I'm 30, so it's not been that long -- but once you see this, it's hard not to unsee how such connections lead to non-action on shit.
In 2019, Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear said he was “grateful to have the trust and support of Kentucky’s Fraternal Order of Police," when they backed him for governor.
NOTE: The FOP has backed Trump both times for his "law and order" stances on criminal justice reform.
So please understand why activists take issue with the same people who pushed Breonna's Law in Kentucky -- such as DeRay being involved with this in Minneapolis.
In this recent interview, he's already applying the same reformist strategy that's failed. mprnews.org/story/2022/02/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In one sense, it reminds you that hip hop remains homophobic (like the rest of the music industry) but it also reinforces the continuous disdain and infatuation folks who don't care about LGBTQIA people still care.
This cycle of "why can't people just be straight up" is proven everytime y'all resort to bashing closeted people with homophobic jokes.
Hell, look how y'all talk about Lil Nas X on here and egged Boosie's attacks on him.
The North never forgot.
It's 2022 and people still find Black men engaging in sexual acts with other men a taboo situation.
It's so infatuating and erotic to so many of you. It's very obvious in the way you all get super graphic about something that "grosses" you.
How come the only time these white celebrities take a bold stand for free speech, fighting against censorship, and protecting creativity is when something racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, and anti-vaxx happens?
Black authors are having books on race banned: Silence.
Like where's Jon Stewart coming out to promote and support all of these diverse writers and thinkers who he used to have on his show who have their books being banned by the GOP?
Why is Joe Rogan, a white man, the barometer of your outrage?
Y'all are telling on yourselves.
Free speech can't only be free for white cis-het men.
Free speech can't only be free for rich people.
Free speech can't only be free for celebrities who have multiple platforms and streams of revenue.
These people are so caught up in their little tone-deaf bubble.
Why is it that there are some people who feel like they have to reiterate "Blackness isn't a monolith" as if Black people don't already know that.
As if anyone else don't already know that.
It reminds me of the cringy "well I don't agree with everything you said, but" -- DUH.
There seems to be this problematic need to put a disclaimer around all things Black.
It reeks of anti-Blackness, in the sense that talking about Black people, issues, and culture has to be given a forewarning that NOT ALL as if it's wrong to just say something without such note.
Imagine having to correct a statement like "racism is offensive to Black people" and then having to go "well, I can't speak for all Black people, but racism is offensive to me."
The Amir Locke murder is another example of how you can't reform your way out of policing in America.
You literally have to trust the police in order to believe reform is possible.
How can you trust an institution that you have to DEMAND REFORM from?
Logically, it's trash.
Think about it, you have to create policies to reform police actions -- THEN reinforce consequences if they violate them -- THEN hope there aren't loopholes for them to fuck up -- THEN trust that politicians are actually on your side -- THEN hope they stay in office.
Yeah, no.
Meanwhile, while you're going through all that politicking and lobbying for the reform, the killings continue to increase, bad elected officials are in office reversing any previous progress, corruption can occur within said police reform organization -- only incremental "steps."
The older I get, the more I've begun to use "anti-Black" when describing the racism Black people experience because it's not that society doesn't want to talk about racism -- it's that they don't want to discuss it when it impacts Black people, therefore making them anti-Black.
Notice how there was no mass debate, confusion, or argument when #StopAsianHate went viral. White conservatives like Meghan McCain could rally behind that in solidarity without feeling as if it was attacking her whiteness.