Been a while since I talked about @RoamResearch. I'm not constantly discovering as many cool new things about as I once was, I'm just _using_ it now. Every day, almost without fail
I just read a blog post about how it's supposedly not easy to know where to put things in Roam, or to find them later. I agree to this extent: the search bar could use some love. But otherwise I don't really understand the complaint
I take a lot of notes on books and podcasts. I have a specific tag that I use in my daily notes, and I either just link to a page for a book/paper and take notes there, or I write some brief metadata for a podcast and take notes in a block under it
Here was one of my first entries like this, and a more recent one
The first one isn't terribly helpful unless I want to answer the question "what did I listen to on Day X" or "when did I listen to Podcast Y"
So I changed my approach. Easy
The second version:
• does not require a page for every episode, nor any thinking about where to put my notes
• points me to the people involved, relevant tags, URL to the episode, and my notes; this takes maybe 30 seconds
• can be easily searched later, as I'll show
Let's say I remember something about UBI I want to look up, but I forget where I heard it. I go look at linked references on the UBI page
I see not only the specific references within the episode notes, but the episode itself
What if I only remember that I heard an interesting interview with someone on @HiddenForcesPod a while back? Or I can't remember what podcast Yang was on?
Again, go to the Hidden Forces page or the Andrew Yang page, check references, and there it is again.
What if I'm looking for a quote on inflation from a book, but I can't remember which one?
I break them up with e.g. [[bookquote]] [[quote]] (direct quote) [[podcastquote]] etc - you can decide if you care about this
Here's one, from The International Monetary System 1945-1981, from Giscard d'Estaing. I could have found it as a direct quote, a book quote, or from his name
But wait, that first screenshot doesn't have the word "inflation" anywhere in it
Ah, it's from the parent block
I could do something like this, and not only find every relevant quote, but every book, podcast, etc where I saved a quote about inflation
You might protest, "but what about [some specific tagging I didn't think to do in advance that I might miss]"
I just.. start doing it. I spend ~0 time worrying about this. It's all there somewhere, and I have lots of breadcrumbs to find what I'm looking for
I've mostly stopped trying to sell people on #RoamCult. Some friends found it as useful as I do, most couldn't see the need
I never use the graph, I wish I had a back button when on mobile, the search bar isn't great, tagging adds some minimal overhead, but I still love it
I use it all the time to find podcast episodes and quotes I want to share with friends. Also, as you might have noticed, I did all of this on mobile
If you don't care about re-reading notes, maybe all my tagging looks absurd. That's cool, use what works for you
I have noticed a weird, persistent hostility towards Roam that I don't really understand. Maybe it's a reaction against all the early enthusiasm and proselytizing, I dunno. But I'm still using it, and I suspect I'll thank myself for it in the future. We'll see!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Do not fully trust a narrative unless you can see the assumptions underlying it and decide whether you agree with them, or at least detect points where you have uncertainty about the claims being made
Related: if you can't find points of disagreement with what someone's saying, or at least places where you're unsure that their statements are fully supported by facts, you may not yet have the epistemic scaffolding to have confidence in their claims
Imagine if people from the 1300s were here on Twitter with the rest of us, talking exactly like present-day Twitter users
"smh 🙄 I'm literally exhausted by all these people who don't understand bad humors"
Consider that the apex of any present-day field of study is likely the top of a ladder that spans from hundreds of years ago to today, and that naïve assumptions about said field might not differ greatly from our medieval poaster's
Further, consider that it is impossible for anyone to grok hundreds of years' worth of insights for *every* field within one lifetime, no matter how much we can compress them
Hopefully this better illustrates the potential virtue of "levels"
> The threshold is set to provide an extremely high level of accuracy and ensures less than a one in one trillion chance per year of incorrectly flagging a given account.
The story many are familiar with goes like this: because BlackRock and Vanguard are so dominant in the asset "management" space, they can charge low fees but make it up on volume
This is true, and leads to further consolidation as investors focus more and more on fees
Jack Bogle himself called this out in a WSJ op-ed as an area for concern with passive funds - size would lead to lower fees, fewer players could compete, leading to a feedback loop of more concentration and dominance as big players grew bigger
The ideal social media network for me would eliminate or significantly reduce the game of positioning yourself above others as if you were at the pinnacle of knowledge/skill in something
It would be built in - by virtue of you being here, you're on my level & we eschew the game
An illustration using first impressions of COVID:
Level 0: COVID is just the flu because that's the only mental box I have for it
Level 1: Experts told me COVID is bad
Level 2: eXpOnEnTiAL GrOwTh
Level 3: We know ~nothing, maximal caution until we know something, then reevaluate
There are variants of each of these levels, there are more levels, I'm not at the top level, top level != Cosmic Truth, etc
But it is exhausting watching people skirmishing over the levels instead of people at each level iterating, learning, & reaching for higher levels together