If a suspect refuses an investigation for 2+ years and then says you should still fully trust whatever evidence they provide years later... is it unfair to say that the evidence provided years later would not be fully reliable?
Are there any investigators who believe that it is appropriate for a suspect to refuse a timely, independent investigation and then later claim that it is immoral to not trust their self-audit?
Apparently some scientists and journalists, who are supposed to have honed their investigative skills over years, believe that the above behavior is acceptable and sufficiently transparent for a matter concerning millions of deaths.
I refuse to be gaslit or guilted into believing that we don't need to credibly investigate the #OriginOfCovid and should just take the word of conflicted parties that they didn't start the pandemic.
https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1491821026824622080
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
