THREAD. One of my followers asked me about this noting it seemed reasonable. It does seem reasonable but other than making a couple correct points is wacked. Yes, there was no "hacking" in what we consider hacking, at least not that we know of yet. And yes Joffe had access 1/
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1493322504353558536
2/ to data. But that's where the reasonableness ends. The govt' has access to alot of things & that doesn't mean they can use it for whatever. And Joffee having legal access to that data also didn't give him the right to do whatever. And we KNOW Joffe's maintainance w/ servers
3/ wasn't for him to try to connect Russia phones to Trump b/c if it was then his company would be the one meeting with the CIA and not his personal lawyer to pass on the "intel."
4/ Also, what "intel" was passed on? NOT what Joffe had which was the Russia phone look-ups from Obama's time in office that disproved the conspiracy theory they were trying to sell the CIA--it was only what supported the theory.
5/ And Joffe's access to the info. definitely didn't give him right to create a conspiracy theory to target Trump and feed disinformation to the CIA.
6/ So here's the proper analysis: thefederalist.com/2022/02/14/hem…
7/ Or longer: thefederalist.com/2022/02/14/spe…
8/ And with additional tidbits: thefederalist.com/2022/02/14/8-m…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
