To the people who respond to every horrific murder with "We need better mental health": Please tell me what specific mental disorder you think these murderers have, and what you think the standard of care for that disorder is.
I have met tons of people with mental issues -- depressed people, schizophrenics, people with bipolar disorder -- and I have never met even *one* who had done anything like follow someone into their house and murder them, or who seemed at all likely to do such a thing.
Frankly, it is insulting and stigmatizing to people with mental health issues to say that brutal killers are just struggling with mental health. Most people with mental health issues are very sweet people.
The fact is, it's become taboo to say that policing and incarceration are the solution to things like this. So instead people can only talk about "mental health" -- thus stigmatizing the millions of people with real treatable mental health issues.
Because everyone is afraid to say "Keep people like this behind bars", they have to say "Get them the mental health treatment they need". I'm all for mental health care! But if you think giving these folks Zoloft and sending them to therapy is gonna work, I have bad news.
All you're accomplishing by treating murder as a mental health issue is to make people think of every depressed person and every schizophrenic as a potential killer.
That is very bad for people who struggle with mental health issues!
The people who say that "better mental health" is the new "thoughts and prayers" are only partially right. "Thoughts and prayers" means "I don't care", while "better mental health" means "I'm afraid to say I want to lock people up".
And ironically this could lead to over-policing. The movement to have mental health workers respond to 911 calls is actually great! But if we decide that every person shouting on the street is a potential KILLER, people are going to want to call the cops on those folks.
Anyway, I don't claim to know what the solution to murder is. But I AM very sure that labeling it a mental health issue is not going to help, and is going to stigmatize a lot of harmless folks who are already suffering.
Please, stop.
(end)
Wow, this was the first time I've actually gotten mad and ranted on Twitter in...years.
Feels refreshing. 😃
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
All the usual suspects are jumping all over Lisa Cook's paper from 2014 and pointing out small errors. But Ken Rogoff served on the Fed Board of Governors and I bet you nobody combed over his papers for errors before he was confirmed! And I bet you he made a few.
Econ academia has very little quality control for data errors. When people do comb over papers for mistakes, they generally find them.
We need a Xillennial-Zillennial alliance, of people who are just a little too old for Millennial bullshit and people who just are a little too young for Millennial bullshit.
Anyone who was born 1980-1986 or 1997-2003 is in the Xillennial-Zillennial alliance. We must unite against the people whose brains were broken by coming of age between the Great Recession and Trump.
The people in that middle decade shall be known as the Harry Potter Generation
"We must impose severe consequences" if Putin invades...But apparently threatening sanctions, which is now all that we're doing, is beating the war drums...So what severe consequences does Bernie want to threaten??
The entire leftist discourse on Ukraine appears to be premised on the mistaken belief that the U.S. has threatened to go to war over Ukraine, when in fact we have only threatened sanctions.
I appreciate the response! And my response here is: If you write a story about a theory, you have a responsibility to grapple with the substance of the theory.
Imagine writing a puff piece about Alex Berenson and his bold struggle to convince the world that vaccines don't work.
No, I don't expect economics reporters to deeply understand these theories. But if you're writing about a theory, good reporting requires getting information about the theory from someone other than its leading proponent!
Just as you wouldn't take your info about antivaxers' theories directly from Alex Berenson if you were writing about antivaxers, you should call up some macroeconomists and ask them about MMT when writing a big feature story on MMT. It is simply the required due diligence.