1/ Brexit Myth - The 2019 election showed Brexit's popularity.
Reality - In the 2019 election 2nd referendum parties gained a clear majority of the popular vote, despite Corbyn, a poor Labour campaign and a wretchedly bad LibDem campaign.
2/ Brexit Myth - Labour was hammered for opposing Brexit.
Reality - Since the referendum Labour has never opposed Brexit. It's electoral failures since then were not brought about by its opposing Brexit.
3/ Brexit Myth - Brexit is inherently popular.
Reality - Since 2017 polls have shown a gradually growing public majority against Brexit. This is in spite of Brexit being supported by almost all of the political & much of the media establishment.
Brexit is not inherently popular
4/ There is a problem for opposition parties in opposing Brexit. It's not because of Brexit's popularity. It's because FPTP and electoral demographics mean fewer Brexit supporter votes are needed to elect an MP than EU supporter votes.
5/ The problem of electoral demographics can be mitigated by a Progressive Alliance making opposition votes more effective at electing MPs. Also Starmer, far more than Corbyn, is likely to attract some of the 20% of Tories who are pro-EU to vote for an opposition candidate.
6/ Please let's stop peddling the myth that Brexit is some kind of invincible popular force. Brexit's apparent popularity is an artifact of a skewed electoral system and, until Corbyn departed, bitter conflict between Labour and the LibDems.
7/ We cannot quickly return to the EU. We first need radical democratic reform including PR, a written constitution, media reform, the squeezing of big money out of politics and the curbing of political lies.
8/ But just because we can't quickly rejoin the EU, does not mean we shouldn't criticise Brexit or that we should parrot Tory lies about 'Brexit opportunities'. Lies destroy democracy. Starmer should have no part in bolstering the biggest lie of all - the great Brexit lie .
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I utterly loathe Corbyn, Milne and Murray for serving as Kremlin stooges, constantly striving to deflect attention away from the aggression and war crimes of Russia and its allies. They are fake antiwar campaigners - frauds collaborating with Putin's kleptofascist imperialism.
Inspite of my loathing for Corbyn I've voted Labour in the last two elections. Such was the appalling lack of realistic choice offered to British voters under FPTP.
In 2014 Corbyn and Milne parroted the Kremlin line that the West caused Putin's invasion of Ukraine. Milne was rewarded by a handshake from Putin just 6 months after the latter attacked Ukraine.
1/ Rees-Mogg is now Minister for Brexit opportunities. I guess they include his dream of slashing environmental and safety standards, Patel’s hope to slash social and employment protection, and Hannan's dream of privatising the NHS.
2/ Raab, Patel, Truss and Kwarteng will be hoping their 'Britannia Unchained' dream of Asian low taxes and an Asian work ethic will come true. What they want, of course, is a tax haven for the rich and a deregulated sweatshop for the rest.
3/ Rees-Mogg might also be hoping to help realise his daddy's prediction of a world in which super-rich Sovereign Individuals first escape national control and then take control of nation states.
1/ Johnson shows all the signs of being a narcissistic psychopath. The Tory elite put him into office knowing his character. My belief is that given the chance he will gladly destroy democracy and the rule of law in order to cling onto the narcissistic gratification of power.
2/ Johnson, it is said seeks popularity. But now he is unpopular he still wants power.
Johnson's quest for popularity was never to please people. It was to prove his power to manipulate and control others. Now he is PM he doesn't need to please people to control them.
3/ Johnson wants freedom for himself and that means controlling others and smashing democratic, legal and normative curbs on his power. All of that suits his kleptocratic enablers who want the curbs on their power destroyed.
Daisy Cooper MP @libdemdaisy has argued that Progressive Alliances don't work. I would argue that she is wrong. The clear tactical voting messages in byelections will be muddied in a General Election, unless there is something like the 1997 Blair-Ashdown pact.
The 1997 Blair-Ashdown pact was kept quiet, but the agreed list of seats for tactical voting was published in the Mirror. It was very effective. I cannot see how that could be reproduced in the present day without the Tory media getting wind of the fact that there was a pact.
1/ How far will Johnson go? If he wins his battle to survive it will be through intimidation blackmail and rule-breaking. With every politically corrupt and abusive step he and his clique takes, the adverse consequences of losing power will become ever greater for them.
2/ Once a ruling clique has gone past a certain stage in the abuse of power, the adverse consequences of losing power become so great that they are driven to cling onto power by ever more abusive means. Has the Johnson regime reached that point?
3/ If the Johnson regime believes that it has reached that point of no return then, if it survives the present crisis, it will redouble its attack on democracy to ensure that it cannot be removed from power and made to face retribution for its misdeeds.
1/ We still don't have a name for the force attacking democracy. It is international. It has taken over the Tories and US Republicans. It is backed by billionaires like Koch, Mercer, Murdoch and Thiel. It links sociopathic greed with nationalism, fascism, racism & bigotry.
2/ The force attacking democracy isn't a top-down organisation. It's a web of money, power and influence linking individuals and groups sharing the desire to destroy liberal democracy. It's backed by Putin, but he only has an effect because others in the West share his goals.
3/ It is frustrating that we still lack a widely agreed name for this web of money and power, greed and hate which is attacking democracy. We only have names for the parts, not for the whole. How can you fight an enemy for whom you have no name?