1) Meituan co-founder Wang Huiwen was with Meituan from inception to IPO. He retired at age 41 a billionaire.
Wang thought deeply about creating a category winning company. I found his insights on how needs evolve and how that relates to markets to be one of the best framing:
2)
- The number of human needs that can be satisfied is fewer than needs that can't be satisfied
- Within the set of needs that can be satisfied under our current state of technology, ROI-positive conditions are far less than ROI-negative needs
3) - Needs that can support a commercial operation are far less than needs that can't
- Lastly, the number of needs that can allow a company to survive competitively is the smallest bucket
Visually, it can be seen as
4) From the standpoint of an individual, their needs manifestation are constantly changing. Wang invokes the notion of Maslow's hierarchy by noting when basic needs such as hunger are unmet, the higher-level needs of altruism and self-expression are not as strong.
5) Therefore, needs are everlasting, but the degree to which they are reflected on the broader community is dependent on the underlying attributes and wealth levels of society at that time.
6) When people talk about needs, it's usually centred around "I" and not considering the societal infrastructure, wealth, education, cultural zeitgeist, etc. Changes in the macro conditions bring changes to a different manifestation of individual needs and, eventually population.
7) On a human desire level, needs are already set - the need either exists or doesn't. But the intensity, prevalence, and feasibility are affected by many factors.
8) Changes in factors such as technology mean that the feasibility of satisfying those needs changes. This encourages greater intensity of the needs in the general population.
Some needs may be amplified by the changes in the social environment, wealth level, human knowledge.
9) A key takeaway is to know that TAM is always bigger than what we see today. Still, it requires a suitable business model and technology to make it commercially viable.
10) Wang proposes that to understand the true size of certain TAMs, we should go back to the path of human development, which is the specialisation of labour focused on things we used to do ourselves.
If you're interesting, I summarised more of Wang's insights in this week's edition.
1) Let's talk about how to think about applying a successful Chinese tech trend to your tech ecosystem.
Let's deconstruct go through the following:
- What makes a trend take off in China
- What is easily replicable
- What isn't
2) A trend takes off in Chinese tech and stays relevant because it can get internet traffic and can make money.
Historically, only getting internet traffic mattered. But as new users dwindled, having a viable commercial model (with eventual break-even unit economics) matters.
3) But how things can make money also requires many Chinese tech ecosystems enabling factors that may not be present in your ecosystem.
So you have to understand whether it was only the Chinese context that meant it would make money.
1) Let's talk about Baidu's fall from grace - from being synonymous with Chinese tech in the form of BAT with a market cap of $110bn to now - a punchline for when a tech trend has ended.
Why did Baidu fall behind?
2) Baidu hustled hard in its early days, it was facing off Yahoo and Google who had first movers advantage in the Chinese market.
They did well in localising search and offering a suite of products such as music and forums to woo the information-hungry Chinese consumer
3) When Google fully pulled out of the Chinese market in 2009, Baidu was on top of the world. It went from owning 66% market share to 100% overnight in the biggest consumer market in the world.
Money basically printed itself through advertising. Everyone could just chill.
1) I was a SaaS-focused VC in Europe for ~5 years, and then left for China to explore the SaaS ecosystem here.
Initially, I was highly disappointed. But after 18 months I've coming out of the trough of disillusionment.
Here's why:
2) Answer: Chinese SaaS aka ToB ( To Business) lags behind that of the Western SaaS ecosystem by estimates of 5 to 10 years due to a combination of unwillingness to pay and high adoption barriers. However Cov-19, labour shortage and regulations have accelerated adoption.
3) In 2020 when I just got back, I took stock of the B2B ecosystem in China and found
- Chinese SMBs ( ~60% of GDP) used cheap labour rather than software
- SMBs don't have cash reserves to invest in upgrades
- Historical software piracy led to lack of desire to pay for software
1) To give a clear example of how I researched, framed and synthesised.
Here's a breakdown of how I put one of my pieces together - specifically on Chinese agriculture tech.
A topic I had little knowledge about beforehand but was able to write a 1,500+ piece in a week.
2) To refresh, my process is:
- Start off with tree trunk knowledge / primers
- Have key questions you are asking
- Background mental models / similar examples
- The finding additional info
- Talk to people and then talk some more
3) For the agricultural piece, I started to look for primers by googling, scanning documents quickly to see what keywords arose.
Turns out the keywords was 'Digital Agriculture' in Chinese, and once I found the particular lexicon for the field, going further was easier.
1) Question I get asked semi-frequently is how I do research / get up to speed on a new topic.
My skills were honed from 2.5 years of management consulting and ~5 years of VC. It's been invaluable since landing in China and starting to learn about Chinese tech
Let's talk how:
2) My process is the follow:
- Start off with tree trunk knowledge / primers
- Have key questions you are asking
- Background mental models / similar examples
- The art of finding additional info
- Talk to people and then talk some more
3) I think it was Wait but why who first framed that learning is about getting a good grasp of the basic shape (aka the tree trunk) before going into the details (the leaves).
This is why I start every search looking for primers on the subject in both English and Chinese.