Welcome back to the #MedEdTwagTeam threads on all things teaching, feedback, and so much more.
We have exciting stuff to help you level up your bedside history and physical examination teaching skills in the coming weeks.
2/ We are still covering the foundations of inpatient teaching. This week, we will be focusing on strategies to improve hypothesis-driven history taking at the bedside during rounds.
3/ Obtaining the HPI is a core skill for patient care.
We're taught to take this history with attention to comprehensiveness
The goal of hypothesis-driven history is to carefully consider what questions impact our diagnostic thinking to make our history taking more effective
4/ This image highlights the multiple opportunities to teach students and residents about HDH.
5/ In the next few tweets, I'll explain why we should teach hypothesis-driven history taking. Hypothesis-driven history taking helps us better diagnose the clinical problem, empowers hypothesis-driven physical examination, & avoids unnecessary diagnostic testing.
6/ History w/ or w/o exam helps establish the final diagnosis more than we think.
In a trial of 80 outpatients, history alone established the final diagnosis in 76% of patients.
In the FAST study, history & exam had a diagnostic accuracy of 88% in patients with syncope.
7/ Hypothesis-driven history helps reduce diagnostic error.
One cause of diagnostic missteps is cognitive errors from faulty information synthesis (see figure below).
Hypothesis-driven history involves a systematic assessment of patients’ symptoms to decrease dx error
8/ Improving diagnosis is often complex given the multiple layers required to achieve it (see figure below)
Hypothesis-driven history taking allows the clinician to acquire data more efficiently, thereby choosing the appropriate illness script to pursue in the assessment.
9/ So, in summary, here are 3 good reasons to teach learners how to take a hypothesis-driven history.
10/ The figure outlines the components of a
hypothesis-driven history.
With the ddx guided by the patient's symptoms, you use targeted questions + time course to arrive at a most likely diagnosis.
This focused approach to history increases its value in dx decision making
11/ Please join us next week as we take the hypothesis-driven-history framework and apply it to a patient scenario from the wards.
You can find our previous threads by following @MedEdTwagTeam
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You just start on a busy clinical service, and on the first day, your students and residents mention they would like more chalk talks on common things they see on the wards.
This week we'll talk about giving effective chalk talks
2/ Chalk talks can be given during or after rounds, although the latter is often more feasible.
Compared to didactic talks, their focus is narrower and their relevance to patient care is more readily apparent.
3/ The most effective chalk talks strike the "rite" balance.
- Relevance to patient care is clear.
- Interactivity maximizes engagement &knowledge retention
- Timing chalk talks to < = 20 minutes balance completeness with learner attn
- Evolve talks based on feedback
Clinical pearls? Evidence based medicine? Are we trying to mix oil and water?
Don't worry, your #MedEdTwagTeam crew is here to help with this week's thread!
2/ The clinical pearl bridges our learner's clinical observations and their developing evidence-based practice.
Our learners are often navigating so much clinical data that a well-timed and well-crafted pearl can help them navigate challenging dx & mgmt scenarios
3/ Clinical pearls have 3 important qualities.
They convey a key easily understood clinical point. This information could inform dx, mgmt, or both. Most important, they should build the knowledge of the receiver, pointing out what is not already known.
Hey #medtwitter! I am giving a go at my first #MedEd#Tweetorial! I want to review my top 10 trials of 2019 inspired by my talk @UTHSC_Medicine on 2019 GIM updates. Thanks to @cjchiu for the inspiration and encouragement to do this!
1) POC CRP to Guide Antibiotic Treatment for COPD trial:
- RCT of 636 patients with GOLD stage II COPD seen at 86 clinics for AECOPD
- 20.4% absolute difference in self-reported abx use with no difference in COPD-related health at 4 weeks
- Maybe a CRP a day keeps the abx away
POC CRP to Guide Antibiotic Treatment Limitations:
- May not be generalizable to patients with more advanced COPD
- Bias reporting by patients
- Not all places have POC CRP available
- Read more here: nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…