"I work in the UK at a company that announced 'Work from Anywhere'. I want to move to Spain/Italy/Portugal. They told me my compensation would drop 35-40%. What are my options?"
Honestly: nothing, beyond either staying put or leaving your company. This is deliberate from them.
Situations like this will become far more common as companies decide on country-adjusted compensation or paying the same across regions.
And I'm adding that it is not unreasonable for large companies to do this.
If they did not adjust your UK salary: they would need to pay everyone in Spain/Italy/Portugal at UK levels. From their end, that would make zero sense.
Instead, they will hire people in those regions.
"But companies should pay for the value created, not the cost of living."
If this was the case, marketing people would be paid far more than software engineers at most places.
The market reality is this: companies pay as much (as little) as they need, to hire people.
"I don't think marketing creates more value than software engineers."
Marketing creates huge value. A visual example on a team of two: one dev and one marketer.
The below is a good case of why marketing *should* be paid as much as engineering.
“Odd, how ‘work from anywhere’ really means ‘work from anywhere in the country.’”
It’s how countries, taxes, visas work. If you’re self-employed, trying to work from *any* country in the world: it’s LOTS of admin.
If you’re employed, it’s just as challenging for your employer.
It’s pretty much only the tech industry where we’re privileged enough to be able to work from almost anywhere.
This does not mean we can ignore national regulations. And countries impose heavy admin and tax burdens on employment, rarely ever optimizing for remote work cases.
There are more startups acting as ‘middlemen’ to employ people in different countries. @deel and @remote are examples.
But by nature these setups are limited (you’re employed though a middleman) and they do not shift liabilities for the company to follow all local regulations.
I’m pro EU startups/scaleups/publicly traded companies, including Adyen.
It’s a just a tragedy how their leadership does nothing while other businesses to hire away so many of their best engineers… all while recording record profits.
I’ve been privately taking with managers at Adyen who were seeing large attritions on their team. I told them they need to move up aggressively. Shared how much others are paying.
These eng managers believed me, but their leadership instead relies on outdated comp data. 🤷♂️
This article has been circulated so much within Adyen at all levels.
They know what the numbers were a year ago to be a top tier company and what market dynamics are (numbers are higher since).
“Quit your job to make money online” is gaining momentum. But most stories are of people selling you their own courses.
The reality is you need to build a profitable business to make a living if you quit. Right now there are more cheap B2C marketing channels with social media.
We’ll see an explosion of profitable online small businesses built on top of cheap social media as a distribution channel. There’s an opening for this strategy for the next years.
But it’s not easy & the majority will not succeed (unit economics & attention economy economics).
The economics for “tech creators” (those quitting a sw eng job) is tough.
To make $300K/yr (a sr eng comp at a big tech in US) you need ~ 3,000 customers/year if you sell something for $100/year. That’s ~30,000 leads at a 10% conversion, and 3M impressions at a 1% conversion.
The root cause on the differences? Compensation, on the surface. The mindset of maximising profits and minimising people expenses (Adyen) vs investing in the future (Stripe).
To give very specific examples on the compensation differences. Same position, similar skillsets, engineer in Amsterdam, total comp (base salary + equity + target bonus):
Adyen business is at Netflix, Google, and Mastercard levels of profitability. It's a money-printing machine.
But instead of paying for software engineers like these companies do, they try to hire the same skillset, but at a steep discount and are surprised it's hard to do so.