I discovered it via @chrislhayes (who is married to one of the hosts, @kateashaw1). It's Shaw & fellow hosts, @ProfMMurray & @LeahLitman, discussing Supreme Court stuff. I was worried it would be too technical but it is so accessible & smart & funny. Just a f'ing delight.
Three recent episodes have been haunting me. On this one, @RuthMarcus chats about her new book on the rise of Brett Kavanaugh. Lemme just say: if you think BK's career is practically a parody of mediocre white privilege ... you don't know the half of it. strictscrutinypodcast.com/podcast/suprem…
I mean, one of the key advances in BK's career came because an older white guy liked, not his record or legal writings, but *the way he played intramural basketball*. I'm not making that up. BK is utterly undistinguished at everything except flattering the old boys network.
Here, we find SCOTUS overruling a federal court (2/3 were judges appointed by Trump!) that had deemed Alabama in violation of the Voting Rights Act. Who wrote the laughably bad, widely mocked opinion? Brett Kavanaugh! Doing what they sent him to do. strictscrutinypodcast.com/podcast/furthe…
And then here, we find that the "nondelegation doctrine" -- which SCOTUS is about to use to dismantle the post-1930s administrative state -- is basically *made up* by cons. There's zero evidence it was ever a thing among the Founders! Amazing. strictscrutinypodcast.com/podcast/party-…
Today's SCOTUS is a petri dish where US political dysfunctions appear in concentrated form. Mediocre men, elevated through antidemocratic means, using garbage scholarship to impose oligarchic policy that majorities have rejected...over the objections of female colleagues. Whee!
I'm making it sound depressing, but the hosts are so sharp & funny. (And -- yell at me if you like -- the absence of overconfident white men in the hosting chair is a relief; like, ahh, we can breathe.) Highly recommend subscribing.
Thus ends Today's Enthusiasm™️.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just to clear this up once & for all: the people who work on & with renewable energy are aware that it is variable.
There are lots & lots of interesting discussions to be had about the variability of renewable energy & how to accommodate it & ensure reliability. None of them begin with the assumption that your interlocutor doesn't know the sun goes down.
Tools to accommodate variability in a net-zero⚡️system:
* short-term storage
* long-term storage
* hydrogen & hydrogen-derived fuels
* biogas & other biofuels
* (natgas or biomass) + CCS
* nuclear (existing &/or advanced)
* hydro
* geothermal
* demand-side (see next tweet)
I wasn't going to respond to this aggravating AP article, but ... it is my nature. I wanna make two quick points on it. apnews.com/article/joe-bi…
First -- yes I am predictable -- it is utterly bizarre to write on this subject & barely mention right-wing media, which has utterly captured rural America & is filling its head with lies & conspiracies. There's no way to understand what's happening without understanding that.
The "Dems" that people in these areas hate bear virtually no resemblance to real-life Dems. It doesn't matter what Fetterman or any other ostentatiously in-touch-with-working-people candidate says -- they'll never hear it! They'll just hear lies about him. That's the root of it.
There are so many columns like this, which equate the things the GOP is actually saying & doing with a caricature of the left. The irony is, there are plenty of reasons to be annoyed with *actual* Dems! But instead they just parrot this "woke mob" bullshit.
But the absolute key to columns by identity centrists is that, insofar as they ever come close to specifying what policy they actually want -- what policy is Sensible & Centrist -- it always ends up being *what Dems are actually doing*.
People responding to this with "ordinary Americans love giant land yachts" & it's driving me crazy. If you think Americans have some kind of innate, inborn love of grotesquely large, unsafe vehicles, congrats, you are a Sucker For Capitalism. The car companies thank you.
OK, I gotta do other stuff, but a final word on this. The US ripped out numerous functional public-transit systems; we built wide roads surrounded by single-family neighborhoods; we developed land-use regs that discourage dense walkability & practically mandate sprawl;
MTG is now the second most coveted endorsement on the right, after Trump.
I will never, as long as I live, understand how any Republican can contemplate that fact & not be deeply, mortifyingly *embarrassed*. thedailybeast.com/republicans-ad…
Kids These Days probably don't appreciate it, but when McCain chose Palin as his running mate, it was viewed as a clownish stunt that cost him the election. The idea that vapid, nasty dipshits from the RW swamp could be taken seriously at the highest levels was unthinkable.
Jokes on us! Palin became the model. McCain & the party he represented are dead & gone; the GOP now is nothing *but* a bunch of proto-Palins. Being vapid & nasty are not just desiderata, but requirements. You can't succeed *without* being vapid & nasty -- ask JD Vance.
What's even more wild than some people continuing to wear masks during a pandemic is other people refusing to accept a free vaccine & thereby prolonging the pandemic.
It's very clear that, while the deliberately unvaxxed are worse on any conceivable metric (moral, social, epidemiological), it is people who insist on continuing to be cautious that truly BOTHER elite pundits, to the point of obsession.
It's worth thinking about why that is. I have my theories. But regardless of the reasons, I wish pundits would work a little harder to distinguish between "things that bother me" & "things that are of real social & political significance." Soooo much punditry consists of ...