Ok, given the anti-vaxx sentiment for childhood vaccination of 5-11 year olds is in full flow, thought some helpful facts might help debunk myths and provide factual information around this. Here goes...
'We don't need it because children aren't seriously affected by COVID-19'
Yes we do. Stop comparing kids to adults. Compare COVID-19 to other illnesses in kids! Kids generally die less than adults, and we should be aiming to keep it that way!!
Let's look at most severe outcomes first - deaths.
We've had 21 deaths with COVID-19 *on the death certificate* as per ONS data in 2021 in 5-14 yrs in England & Wales. These are deaths *involving COVID-19* not *with COVID-19*
Of these, 18 had COVID-19 as primary cause, with the remaining being contributing (also on the causal pathway).
'But we're talking about 5-11 yr olds. Why are you looking at 5-14 yr olds?'
Because I want to make comparisons with other childhood illnesses & this is how death data are provided. Take it up with NOMIS/ONS!
Let's compare these deaths to deaths from other childhood illnesses- let's look at 2020 - deaths in 5-14 yr olds
Flu: 8
flu and all pneumonias: 14
Measles: 0
Mumps: 0
Varicella: 1
Rubella: 0
'Not fair- mitigations were in place in 2020, which is why all this was low'
Yes, but that's the same for COVID-19 - we're yet to see completely unmitigated spread. But I'll indulge you.
Here's the data from 2019
Flu: 11
Flu & *all* pneumonia: 34
Measles:1
Mumps:0
Varicella:1
'Oh, but we vaccinate for these- not comparable with impact of illnesses unvaccinated'
Ok, fine. Let's look at the data from the ONS on flu.
*21* deaths from flu *and* all pneumonias in *0-14 yr* olds in 2003 *before* routine flu vaccination in kids.
So COVID-19 under current mitigations comparable to deaths from flu and all-cause pneumonia pre-vax and *much* higher than all vaccinatable childhood illnesses in recent years
Let's look at other outcomes now. Long COVID tripled in children between July-Nov '21 increasing to 117,000 from 38,000. For 2-11 yr olds this number is 44,000. And 20,000 children with persistent symptoms for *more than a year* - of which 11,000 are 2-11 yr old.
That isn't trivial. This was pre-omicron - since when many more have been infected in this age group. And we have no idea what the prognosis is for many of these children, and what the long term effects of this illness are.
The UKHSA review of multiple studies showed that vaccines were effective in reducing the rate of long COVID, and potentially the severity and duration as well. And this is on top of the small but relevant impact vaccines have on reducing infection.
And vaccines do reduce transmission. Even if the impact isn't huge. Infection rates in primary school children have exceeded those in secondary school children since vaccine rollout in - however inefficient it's been - in the older age group.
320,000 children were absent from school for COVID-19 related reasons in the 6th Feb DfE attendance report. 165,000 of these were primary school kids. Any reduction in this would be worth it. Even if vaccines have a small effect on transmission, this will make a diff.
Impacts on families: Almost 12,000 children in the UK have been orphaned by SARS-CoV-2 as per Imperial estimation. Any reduction in transmission to children and from children matters - if it makes their families and carers safer.
8 million children have been vaccinated in the US alone. Most countries that have resource are able to vaccinate kids in this age group are doing so. We know these vaccines are safe and effective. Risk of myocarditis is extremely low- *far far far* lower than risk from COVID-19.
And vaccine associated myocarditis apart from being extremely rare (2/million) is also typically mild. This is not the case for COVID-19 associated myocarditis which has been associated with arrhythmias and fatalities in children.
'But what about global vaccine equity?'
Global vaccine equity is vital but we're not going to achieve it by donating 10 million paediatric doses of Pfizer to Covax. If we're serious about this, we need patent waivers and tech transfer agreements to scale up domestic manufacturing
And the only way donating those dosing would be ethical would be if we then made every effort to reduce exposure in kids to the minimum - because letting tens of thousands of kids get long COVID cannot be the moral alternative. But we aren't doing that.
So we owe our children to do this - at the very least- given we've done so little to protect them.
Adding a bit more myth busting here at request - on natural infection of children.
'But loads of kids have been infected now- why do they need to be vaccinated?'
There's a lot of evidence that infection in children leads to lower levels of antibodies than adults, & that many children serorevert (become antibody negative) not very long after infection - vaccines provide safe & reliable immunity. Infection doesn't.
This may also explain the high levels of re-infection we saw in 10-14 yr olds during the omicron wave. As new variants emerged we will likely see more re-infection, so getting vaccinated is important, even if you've been infected to give you greater & more reliable protection.
I've just been reviewing the DfE 'study' that was widely reported in the media as showing 'no evidence masks work in schools'. I honestly can't believe this was even written up into a formal report given the *huge* limitations.🧵
The study compared mask wearing in schools that responded to a question reporting mask use *either in communal areas or classrooms* for just *2 wks* or more- and assessed the impact on absenteeism just 3 wks later!!
Let me unpick this- we don't even know if the schools in the treatment group had kids *wearing masks in classrooms*. Given this was Oct '21 it's very likely that a substantial proportion if not the majority just had masks in communal areas (corridors)!
Your own documentation shows that 67% of these deaths were *from* not *with COVID-19* in the 5th wk- that's a *huge* number & a big increase - and even at that point just under the 1st wave peak. At this point it's likely even higher. Stop gaslighting the public. Do your job.
I and many others have been shocked by the messaging coming out of the Danish public health body- saying MIS-C is a self-limiting syndrome? I guess things that kill you can be self-limiting in a way. But what about the children who end up with long-term sequelae?
Discussions around excess deaths dropping (which has reversed now) without acknowledging that excess deaths will drop in winter if behaviour changes due to reduction in *other* respiratory deaths even as COVID-19 deaths rise!
Really concerned about the *huge* delays in COVID-19 childhood vaccination in England. After JCVI's announcement that 5-11 yr olds from vulnerable households would be eligible for vaccination *2 months ago*, these are still not being offered where I live (spoke to the CCG today).
They have no date for when it'll start here. Despite the announcement yesterday, given the shambolic roll-out so far both in 12-15 yr olds & CV 5-11 yr olds, I feel very little hope that anything will happen in actual terms anytime soon. Esp with messaging that it's 'non-urgent'
With huge amounts of help from motivated parents, I've finally managed to book my daughter in at a clinic hours away, but these vaccines are largely inaccessible to parents whose kids have been eligible for months now. When did kids become the lowest priority in our society?
I'm sorry to hear that some of my followers are being trolled on my threads. I don't usually see the trolling now, because of my settings & liberal blocking. If you are being targeted, please bring this to my attention via DM, so I can ensure I block & report whoever it is.
I don't care much about trolling directed at me anymore (as I don't see most of it + have developed a thick skin!), but I am keen that those who follow me don't get penalised & abused for following and commenting.
There are lots of bots/misogynists/racists/scientist trolls who direct hate at me. Some of them may even appear reasonable at first but are sealioning. The best way to deal with them is to not engage, as engagement only increases their visibility on Twitter. And block. Liberally.
Here's why BA.2 should be designated a VOC. While BA.2 is a sub-lineage of omicron, it's more different genetically to BA.1 than the other VOCs were from each other. It has a 2x greater rate of growth/wk than BA.2 in England & is growing towards dominance.🧵
It has ~40% higher Rt than BA.1 (due to ⬆️transmissibility or escape or both), has been doubling relative to BA.2 each week in England and has a serial interval shorter than BA.1 by half a day (making it even harder to contain).
Early lab data suggests it may be more pathogenic (higher syncitia formation), and potentially some escape from those infected with BA.1, especially if unvaccinated/unexposed previously.
Evidence here: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
The tragedy is that despite being fringe pseudoscience, GBD ideology became widely entrenched into policy, and had disproportionate influence- e.g. Gupta, Heneghan, Tegnell some of it's main proponents met with our PM, and HART & UsForThem has had strong links with CRG & Zahawi.
They won despite being a minority debunked ideology. But they're such sore winners- despite pushing policies that have and will continue to kill people in the thousands, they continue to attack those who tried to bring evidence into policy & fought these anti-science agendas.
I wish MSM would report this- how scientists with fringe views who were proponents of misinformation and disinformation came to have so much influence on govt policy. Rather than suggesting these 'scientists' were shunned. They should've been, but sadly were platformed repeatedly