Your own documentation shows that 67% of these deaths were *from* not *with COVID-19* in the 5th wk- that's a *huge* number & a big increase - and even at that point just under the 1st wave peak. At this point it's likely even higher. Stop gaslighting the public. Do your job.
I and many others have been shocked by the messaging coming out of the Danish public health body- saying MIS-C is a self-limiting syndrome? I guess things that kill you can be self-limiting in a way. But what about the children who end up with long-term sequelae?
Discussions around excess deaths dropping (which has reversed now) without acknowledging that excess deaths will drop in winter if behaviour changes due to reduction in *other* respiratory deaths even as COVID-19 deaths rise!
We saw this in England- covid deaths increased while excess deaths dropped. Please don't pretend that this means that it's good news for COVID-19- it isn't. it's just replacing one type of death with another.
Do you know that COVID-19 deaths in children exceed those from other childhood illnesses both in the UK and the US? Please stop saying that COVID-19 has no severe impacts on children. You accuse others of spreading misinformation while doing so yourself.
Public health organisations have a duty to the public. And you're badly failing yours.
Note: If you want to read the SSI reports, and don't speak Danish- you can go to google translate and choose the translate document option to read these in English - the translation is pretty good.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've just been reviewing the DfE 'study' that was widely reported in the media as showing 'no evidence masks work in schools'. I honestly can't believe this was even written up into a formal report given the *huge* limitations.🧵
The study compared mask wearing in schools that responded to a question reporting mask use *either in communal areas or classrooms* for just *2 wks* or more- and assessed the impact on absenteeism just 3 wks later!!
Let me unpick this- we don't even know if the schools in the treatment group had kids *wearing masks in classrooms*. Given this was Oct '21 it's very likely that a substantial proportion if not the majority just had masks in communal areas (corridors)!
Really concerned about the *huge* delays in COVID-19 childhood vaccination in England. After JCVI's announcement that 5-11 yr olds from vulnerable households would be eligible for vaccination *2 months ago*, these are still not being offered where I live (spoke to the CCG today).
They have no date for when it'll start here. Despite the announcement yesterday, given the shambolic roll-out so far both in 12-15 yr olds & CV 5-11 yr olds, I feel very little hope that anything will happen in actual terms anytime soon. Esp with messaging that it's 'non-urgent'
With huge amounts of help from motivated parents, I've finally managed to book my daughter in at a clinic hours away, but these vaccines are largely inaccessible to parents whose kids have been eligible for months now. When did kids become the lowest priority in our society?
Ok, given the anti-vaxx sentiment for childhood vaccination of 5-11 year olds is in full flow, thought some helpful facts might help debunk myths and provide factual information around this. Here goes...
'We don't need it because children aren't seriously affected by COVID-19'
Yes we do. Stop comparing kids to adults. Compare COVID-19 to other illnesses in kids! Kids generally die less than adults, and we should be aiming to keep it that way!!
Let's look at most severe outcomes first - deaths.
We've had 21 deaths with COVID-19 *on the death certificate* as per ONS data in 2021 in 5-14 yrs in England & Wales. These are deaths *involving COVID-19* not *with COVID-19*
I'm sorry to hear that some of my followers are being trolled on my threads. I don't usually see the trolling now, because of my settings & liberal blocking. If you are being targeted, please bring this to my attention via DM, so I can ensure I block & report whoever it is.
I don't care much about trolling directed at me anymore (as I don't see most of it + have developed a thick skin!), but I am keen that those who follow me don't get penalised & abused for following and commenting.
There are lots of bots/misogynists/racists/scientist trolls who direct hate at me. Some of them may even appear reasonable at first but are sealioning. The best way to deal with them is to not engage, as engagement only increases their visibility on Twitter. And block. Liberally.
Here's why BA.2 should be designated a VOC. While BA.2 is a sub-lineage of omicron, it's more different genetically to BA.1 than the other VOCs were from each other. It has a 2x greater rate of growth/wk than BA.2 in England & is growing towards dominance.🧵
It has ~40% higher Rt than BA.1 (due to ⬆️transmissibility or escape or both), has been doubling relative to BA.2 each week in England and has a serial interval shorter than BA.1 by half a day (making it even harder to contain).
Early lab data suggests it may be more pathogenic (higher syncitia formation), and potentially some escape from those infected with BA.1, especially if unvaccinated/unexposed previously.
Evidence here: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
The tragedy is that despite being fringe pseudoscience, GBD ideology became widely entrenched into policy, and had disproportionate influence- e.g. Gupta, Heneghan, Tegnell some of it's main proponents met with our PM, and HART & UsForThem has had strong links with CRG & Zahawi.
They won despite being a minority debunked ideology. But they're such sore winners- despite pushing policies that have and will continue to kill people in the thousands, they continue to attack those who tried to bring evidence into policy & fought these anti-science agendas.
I wish MSM would report this- how scientists with fringe views who were proponents of misinformation and disinformation came to have so much influence on govt policy. Rather than suggesting these 'scientists' were shunned. They should've been, but sadly were platformed repeatedly