It's already been two years since John Vervaeke completed his 50 episodes 'Awakening from the Meaning Crisis'. I revisited one lecture and realized that it's much better than when I originally watched it!
My original motivation for watching his lectures was to see if I can gain more insight on human cognition in the hopes of understanding general intelligence. So I skipped most of his lectures until episode 26.
The previous episodes are a historical account of how humans evolved their thinking of how they would navigate this world. I tend to not care for historical accounts because they spend time on dead ends.
I've now come to realize the importance of the historical account. Humans tend to formulate their understanding based on the 'pyscho' technologies invented in the past. Thus to understand the various theories of cognition, one cannot avoid understanding their original framing.
This approach of studying the history of ideas appears to be similar to how philosophers work out their theories. I'm not a fan of philosophy, furthermore not all ideas, that philosophers consider important, makes their way to the collective consciousness of society.
Culture affects how we frame our models of reality. But culture evolves from the revolutionary ideas of individuals who have looked at the world differently from the rest. It is how ideas have been combined that gives us the tapestry of how modern humans frame the world.
But let's be careful here. How humans frame reality, is not the same as how human cognition works. The former are habits that we've been accustomed to. By explicitly knowing these habits, we learn to see what we are not seeing.
General intelligence is difficult because we have built layers of psycho-technologies that lead us to a wrong path of understanding. Our decision-making is based on our intuition. An intuition that is the result of multiple layers of habits. Habits that come from history.
Thus, to understand the flaws in our intuition, we have to understand the habits from where it originates.
The alignment chart that has its origins in Dungeons and Dragons has a fascinating choice of just two dimensions that comprehensively shape a characters' behavior. theatlantic.com/technology/arc…
'A “good” moral alignment means a character will lean toward altruism and personal sacrifice. Evil means harming and oppressing. A neutral person is one who wouldn’t kill somebody for no reason, but wouldn’t protect anybody for no reason either.'
'lawfulness,“implies honor, trustworthiness, obedience to authority, and reliability. On the downside, lawfulness can include closed-mindedness, reactionary adherence to tradition, judgmentalness, and a lack of adaptability.'
It is a common belief that human civilization evolution is predominantly influenced by the religious and philosophical ideas of the past. I don't think this is true, civilization is influenced by technology. Let me explain.
Technology influences the direction of civilization because we are 'forced' to adopt it. We adopt technology because it is useful. We adopt it regardless of our religious or philosophical biases.
The Amish, as part of their religion. deliberately avoid modern technologies. With the exception, however, if it is used for work. So it is not uncommon to see them with smartphones and credit card readers to facilitate their commerce.
Surprise! Deep Learning may be the technology that saves us from extinction due to climate change! So for all those detractors, I would like to see your public apologies. wired.co.uk/article/deepmi…
Perhaps it took so long to create a sustainable fusion reactor because humanity did not have the automated cognitive technology to adjust the magnetic field on the fly. What if nuclear fusion was a similar problem to balancing a ball on a pole?
Researchers have thought the problem could be solved by bigger and more powerful reactors. But with this new approach, there's a possibility for smaller fusion reactors. Reactors that are enough to fit in mobile vehicles!
A horrible thing happened right after the printing press was invented. 4.5 to 8 million people died in Europe due to 30 years of warfare. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty_Ye…
A war spawned by the conflict between truth originating from traditional authority and truth originating from literal text. A new war is brewing between the theists and the atheists. Subjective truth versus objective truth.
To avoid this war, Science must recognize the subjective.
I'm also Asian, but I confess that the lack of exposure to faces of different races does affect your recognition abilities. One would think that it's only Asian faces, but it's any face of an unfamiliar kind. Recognizing faces is an intuition that requires practice.
Yesterday, my wife was spotted by a co-worker in a crowded shopping area. This was despite wearing a facemask and a heavy jacket. People can recognize other people with the smallest of cues.
'Rote Adaptiveness', the capability of automatically being adaptive seems like an oxymoron and is also not as well investigated. But this capability is critical to General Intelligence.
How can a skill that is performed without comprehension be one that is also adaptive? This sounds counterintuitive, yet we see this all the time in the field of software development.
Decades ago, it was well understood that software development should not be executed not like a factory floor. Instead, software development is more like a discovery process. Furthermore, we can invent processes to accelerate this discovery process.