It is a common belief that human civilization evolution is predominantly influenced by the religious and philosophical ideas of the past. I don't think this is true, civilization is influenced by technology. Let me explain.
Technology influences the direction of civilization because we are 'forced' to adopt it. We adopt technology because it is useful. We adopt it regardless of our religious or philosophical biases.
The Amish, as part of their religion. deliberately avoid modern technologies. With the exception, however, if it is used for work. So it is not uncommon to see them with smartphones and credit card readers to facilitate their commerce.
At the end of World War 2, the centralized control economy of communist USSR was at par with the USA. But as technology advanced and became more complex, their economies could not keep up technologically. It all collapsed in the 1990s.
That's because people will vote with their feet. Politics or religion be damned. Humans will use whatever tool they will find useful for their own wellbeing. So if masks and vaccines keep you alive then the hell with politics. Let the zealots die clinging to their beliefs.
Humans frame their explanations based on the models they've learned. We gravitate towards Adam Smith or Karl Marx as models of societies. We imagine the world being driven around the decisions in the political sphere. But is this not all just a cognitive facade?
What actually changes the world are the multitude of technologies that have come into ubiquitous use. Human minds are influenced more by technology than any philosophy or religion. That is because technology is undeniably useful and what is useful is an objective truth.
I will be in error if I don't recognize religion and philosophy as a kind of technology. However, there is a difference between technology that you can replicate and technology that places the burden of interpretation on the user.
It is often the case that religions attempt to solve this 'replication crisis' by demanding a literal interpretation of their religious text. That goes downhill very quickly when inconsistencies with reality become conspicuous (see: Noah's Ark).
Humans are pragmatic beings. Humans can still thrive despite keeping in their heads logical inconsistent ideas. We now see this every day with senseless arguments in the political space.
The problem with relying on lies is that it's very difficult to keep everything logically consistent. The best way to catch a liar is to have them discuss their narrative in length. Inconsistencies are an indication of the presence of dogma.
The beauty of technology is that they more than often are consistently useful. The dark side though is that technology is exponentially growing and as a consequence humans are driven to a loss of understanding of their own constructed reality.
There is always a human appeal is always to simplify their world models into a closed system where no new inputs are entertained. Closed systems can't avoid inconsistency (see: Godel) and tend toward entropy (see: Boltzmann).
Humans need a sense of permanency to derive meaning in their lives. Adult humans are not beings that are comfortable being endlessly transformed. Too many of us would prefer that time froze.
As technology makes its inexorable progress, our social coordination mechanisms will look more and more like technologies. We see the first salvo of this with money being transformed into a technology solution (see: cryptocurrencies). This is just the beginning.
Applications like Noom highlight how effective digital therapeutics can be. People's health habits are changing at scale because this replicable application nudges them effectively to develop beneficial habits.
Technology has become not only useful tools but instead useful psycho-technologies. David Bowie got it right about the internet. "It's just a tool isn't it? No, it's an alien life form"
The destiny of the human species isn't dictated by our politics or our philosophies. It's dictated by something that we have very weak control over. It is dictated by our inventiveness.
Unfortunately, our inventiveness is accelerating!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Carlos E. Perez

Carlos E. Perez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IntuitMachine

Feb 17
The alignment chart that has its origins in Dungeons and Dragons has a fascinating choice of just two dimensions that comprehensively shape a characters' behavior. theatlantic.com/technology/arc…
'A “good” moral alignment means a character will lean toward altruism and personal sacrifice. Evil means harming and oppressing. A neutral person is one who wouldn’t kill somebody for no reason, but wouldn’t protect anybody for no reason either.'
'lawfulness,“implies honor, trustworthiness, obedience to authority, and reliability. On the downside, lawfulness can include closed-mindedness, reactionary adherence to tradition, judgmentalness, and a lack of adaptability.'
Read 9 tweets
Feb 17
It's already been two years since John Vervaeke completed his 50 episodes 'Awakening from the Meaning Crisis'. I revisited one lecture and realized that it's much better than when I originally watched it!
My original motivation for watching his lectures was to see if I can gain more insight on human cognition in the hopes of understanding general intelligence. So I skipped most of his lectures until episode 26.
The previous episodes are a historical account of how humans evolved their thinking of how they would navigate this world. I tend to not care for historical accounts because they spend time on dead ends.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 16
Surprise! Deep Learning may be the technology that saves us from extinction due to climate change! So for all those detractors, I would like to see your public apologies. wired.co.uk/article/deepmi…
Perhaps it took so long to create a sustainable fusion reactor because humanity did not have the automated cognitive technology to adjust the magnetic field on the fly. What if nuclear fusion was a similar problem to balancing a ball on a pole?
Researchers have thought the problem could be solved by bigger and more powerful reactors. But with this new approach, there's a possibility for smaller fusion reactors. Reactors that are enough to fit in mobile vehicles!
Read 9 tweets
Feb 16
A horrible thing happened right after the printing press was invented. 4.5 to 8 million people died in Europe due to 30 years of warfare. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty_Ye…
A war spawned by the conflict between truth originating from traditional authority and truth originating from literal text. A new war is brewing between the theists and the atheists. Subjective truth versus objective truth.
To avoid this war, Science must recognize the subjective.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 16
Why is it so common that bigoted people all too often expose their cognitive flaws?
I'm also Asian, but I confess that the lack of exposure to faces of different races does affect your recognition abilities. One would think that it's only Asian faces, but it's any face of an unfamiliar kind. Recognizing faces is an intuition that requires practice.
Yesterday, my wife was spotted by a co-worker in a crowded shopping area. This was despite wearing a facemask and a heavy jacket. People can recognize other people with the smallest of cues.
Read 8 tweets
Feb 15
'Rote Adaptiveness', the capability of automatically being adaptive seems like an oxymoron and is also not as well investigated. But this capability is critical to General Intelligence.
How can a skill that is performed without comprehension be one that is also adaptive? This sounds counterintuitive, yet we see this all the time in the field of software development.
Decades ago, it was well understood that software development should not be executed not like a factory floor. Instead, software development is more like a discovery process. Furthermore, we can invent processes to accelerate this discovery process.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(