.@TheEconomist reports on concerns about @NHSEngland 's new pilot gender clinics for adults. The protocol is blatantly unsafe esp for vulnerable young people (17 and above), whose mental health needs are overlooked. economist.com/britain/2022/0…
The clinics adopt a US-style 'affirmative' approach and use generalist clinicians to prescribe powerful hormones without undertaking a detailed psychological evaluation of the patient's readiness.
Talking therapies to overcome gender dysphoria are "not offered routinely".
The treatment protocol "will sideline mental-health expertise & thereby not address co-existing mental health problems that might be worsening the gender dysphoria".
Four current & past members of the @RCPhysicians ethics committee expressed concerns: "We did not get the sense that gender medicine was open to scrutiny or self-criticism on standard medical criteria, such as side-effects & long-term outcomes" said Prof @AlasdairColes
We know from recent studies how poor NHS services are for young adults with gender identity problems - including the v long waits for help. Many young adults are vulnerable who've suffered years of mental illness. A free-for-all is no kind of solution.
Gender clinicians themselves admit that the "model of care in adult GICs is based on experience with older transwomen, not younger transmen or non-binary service users" for whom it may represent a risk to their long-term health. cambridge.org/core/journals/…
The pilot gender clinics offer hormones for patients with non-binary identities, but there's no evidence they help. Dr Leighton Seal, consultant endocrinologist at the @TaviAndPort gender clinic says: "we have to accept that there is no robust literature on this subject" ...
Dr Seal again: "there are no clearly established guidelines for the hormonal treatment of non-binary people, and a lack of empirical evidence on which to base practice".
Rates of detransition or stopping treatment, as measured in two recent studies, are very significantly higher than historic estimates, and are as common as 20%. mdpi.com/2227-9032/10/1…
We're worried the pilot clinics are offering a one-size-fits-all, highly invasive & burdensome medical approach. The NHS should trial psychological interventions, to find the most effective way to help patients manage their dysphoria. link.springer.com/article/10.100…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This week @ProfTanya failed a dad, who'd asked him for help about his 6th former child who IDs as non-binary. We'd like him to know he's welcome in our group, & we offer some advice, parent to parent. Tanya, please read it too if poss. thetimes.co.uk/article/my-chi…
Firstly, your evident closeness with your daughter is a strong protective factor. It's also excellent that you're trying to meet them where they're at. Your child needs you, and keeping that dialogue going will be vital in helping them overcome their distress about gender.
You're right to be alarmed that they might remove healthy body parts for the sake of "authenticity".
Here's the reality as experienced by a mum in our group only weeks ago:
We hear often from parents that schools' view of their child's gender ID issues made an already complex situation worse.
We ask schools: please understand gender identity problems from a child development & mental health perspective, not solely as a minority rights issue 1/6
Work with parents, and do everything to strengthen family bonds, not undermine them. Vulnerable adolescents need their parents, even as they may be railing against them. 2/6
It is staggering that schools need parental permission to take a pupil on a trip, yet can transition a child's gender without the parent's knowledge. Information-sharing is critical for safety. 3/6
We're glad Sonia Appleby got justice from @TaviAndPort. Genuine concerns about GIDS were dismissed as transphobia - an accusation @PaulJThinks has levelled at us too recently. We publish our correspondence with him below, in the public interest. 1/
Last yr Dr Heather Wood of GIDS told 3000 UK psychologists that we were "not an appropriate resource" for parents & our website was "blatantly transphobic". Her problem stemmed from our link to @Transgendertrd, a site many parents find helpful and informative.
2/
We're parents devoted to our kids in tough times. Our doubts about the efficacy of life-long experimental drugs are reasonable. We're proud NHS users. As we told the BMJ, the NHS should work with us, not point judgmental fingers as Dr Wood did. 3/ doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2…
A thread about unsafe prescribing and the exploitation of children for money.
A thread about a rotten apple in the midst of the LGBT advocacy sector.
A thread about GenderGP.
GenderGP feeds off the GIDS waiting list: without it, the rationale to go private is much reduced.
Advocacy groups offer parents no other way to understand a child's distress, than that they must ‘b’ock’ the emergency of a 'wrong' puberty, which lead to a lifetime's medication.
But puberty blockers are not an elixir that unlocks a child's 'true self', they are an experimentally repurposed cancer drug of now dubious legality that offers indifferent results.
Recently, @BBCNewsnight reported on a 2005-6 review of @TaviAndPort ’s Gender Identity Development Service (then known as GIDU), by Dr David Taylor. We have obtained the report via FOI and are publishing it below.
Taylor’s report was prompted by staff disquiet at GIDS, which has continued ever since. @sueevansprotect was the whistleblower then, and has continued her work to safeguard children at GIDS most recently by launching a judicial review with Mum A and @keira crowdjustice.com/case/protect-c…
The report’s concerns are ominously familiar to those raised by staff more recently. As The Times reported in April 2019, many more staff have turned whistleblower in the years since.
The ‘social laboratory’ of the internet is widely acknowledged. GIDS itself sponsored a D.Psych thesis by Xinyi Lee, on “transgender youths’ experiences of using social media”, based on 11 patient interviews. Download it here:
As Dr Lee wrote, “parents & clinicians [should be] working together in ensuring that social media use does not pose a risk… it is important for parents to be equally aware of the nature of social media platforms and the potential benefits & risks posed”