#SPSP2022 In collaboration with @TEDTalks "mystery experiment", @DunnHappyLab studied the effects of giving $10,000 to 200 people to spend however they wanted (plus 100 in no-$ control condition). Really striking findings!! 1/n
Money does buy happiness (even 3 months after the money has been spent)! #SPSP2022 2/n
Red bars = how much life satisfaction $2 mil would have provided a millionaire couple; Blue bars = life satisfaction gains from redistributing that to 200 people ($10,000 each). Love this visualization/effect size quantification!! #SPSP2022 3/n
Wowwwwwww. Super-sized version of the dictator game: People spent an average of $6,431 of their $10,000 endowment on others!!!!! People are generous, even when the stakes are high. (Even when "others" are restricted to strangers/causes, still around $3,000). #SPSP2022 4/n
Participants who were in the public condition (instructed to Tweet about their experience, including gathering opinions on how the $ should be spent) spent similar amounts as those in the private conditions. So reputation concerns didn't seem to increase generosity. #SPSP2022 5/5

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Jessie Sun

Dr. Jessie Sun Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JessieSunPsych

Oct 10, 2021
Thought I'd share some miscellaneous thoughts/lessons from two rounds on the job market: 🧵 1/n
Be aware that out-of-pocket costs can add up! Some universities made me book my own flights (including an international flight!), & I had to wait weeks for reimbursement. In one case, I also ended up staying a few extra nights in b/t interviews (instead of flying home first). 2/n
The lesson is that universities should book flights if at all possible to make it easier on job candidates, and advisors can also support their students (e.g., by offering to pay for extra nights of accommodation out of their research budget). 3/n
Read 18 tweets
Nov 29, 2020
Great thread. The dominance of Likert-type outcome measures means that most psychologists don't actually know what a non-arbitrary measure looks like. So here's a thread on how we can make our measures less arbitrary: 1/n
Blanton & Jaccard's (2006) paper revolutionised my thinking about effect sizes and meaningful metrics in psychology. I highly recommend it. psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-00… 2/n
Their key argument is that a metric is arbitrary when it provides no information about where a person is located on the true underlying continuum, or what a 1-unit change means. 3/n
Read 11 tweets
May 15, 2020
Fascinating preprint, @DHBostyn & @xphilosopher! A few journal club thoughts from me and @AllardThuriot (Thread): 1/n
1) We loved the goal of mathematically modelling different shapes of blame/praise judgments, and identifying neutral points. I saw this as very much in line w/ calls to reduce the arbitrariness of measures and define the continua of constructs, e.g.: psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-00… 2/n
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(