Seeing the arbitrary and absurd tenure decisions in the last few days has me feeling some kind of way. It's a system that can fail even more easily than it succeeds. So much depends on colleagues not being sociopathic assholes, which in academe is...not a given.
A story 🧵:
2. In 2003 I was hired on a tenure-track job at a small liberal arts college in the northeast that seemed like a dream gig. But 2 weeks into the Spring semester, my 3 dept. colleagues gave me a letter explaining why they would not be renewing my contract after the academic year.
3. The letter was 11 single-spaced pages. ELEVEN. SINGLE-SPACED. PAGES. And I will never forget the end line of the opening paragraph. "It is our conclusion that Dr. Gannon will never be an effective teacher, researcher, or colleague." And then 10-1/2 more pages of sunshine.
4. Now, I'd published a book chapter, an article, and several reviews in the summer and Fall after I started my contract. None of the 3 of them had published anything in years. My teaching evals were excellent, (even though those aren't the most reliable things to use).
5. So what happened? I don't know. I had sensed a shift that previous November, right before Thanksgiving, where the department dynamic seemed to get weird. To this day, I have no idea what I might have done. Whatever it was, they'd gone from collegial to "fuck you" quick, y'all.
6. I'd been assigned a faculty mentor from another dept, but every attempt I made to connect w/ her went unanswered. My dean was a long time faculty member who was intimidated by my department, and wanted no part of my case. The provost was new, and didn't want to rock any boats.
7. Finally, a few other faculty heard about what was going on. It was then that I found out all sorts of interesting stuff. My dept. was me, two mid-career women (one who was an alum of the school and the current chair), and an older male who had been there for decades.
8. I was the first hire they'd made in almost two decades. I replaced the former chair who'd apparently held the dept. together, and was the only one who played nice with anyone else at the college. The dept. had a reputation of being grumpy, petulant obstructionists. AWESOME.
9. The senior dude basically ran the show. What he said was law. Turns out when the current chair was an undergrad, the senior dude was chair and had had an extramarital affair with her. Remember: I'm finding all of this out after I've essentially been fired.
10. According to these other faculty, I must have done something to piss off the senior dude, and it was likely something that made no sense, because in addition to being an asshole, he was also a raging alcoholic and not always sober while he was on campus. SUPER!
11. As word of my case got out, other faculty came to me to express sympathy. I appreciated that, and it was nice to finally know what was going on. But you know what would have been better? KNOWING ANY OF THIS WHEN IT WOULD HAVE MADE A DIFFERENCE
12. The college P&T committee dragged their feet on my appeal, and didn't even want to deal with it. By then I was back on the market, after most of the job cycle had finished for the year, and absolutely lucked into a late-opening position. One which I still occupy to this day.
13. So while my story had a happy ending, it's only because of luck and huge support from grad school mentors and my family. I still had to run out the string that semester, which was hella awkward. The Dean audibly sighed with relief when I told him I was withdrawing my appeal
14. I was a new faculty member in an environment where no one ensured I received the mentoring I was entitled to. I had no guidance about submitting my contract-renewal application. *I never even got the faculty handbook*. And...my department was a pit of sociopathic vipers.
15. It should suprise no one that there were no faculty or admins at this college who weren't white. If there were any faculty or admins of color, I did not meet them the entire year I was on campus. Clearly, supporting (or even being humane to) new colleagues was not a priority.
16. Reappointment, tenure, and promotion are absolute crapshoots in institutions like this where departments are allowed to get high on their own supply without any repercussions or accountability. My story is just one small sliver in the pile of evidence. The system often fails.
17. Anyway, that's the story of how my academic career almost imploded after just six months. When I see these arbitrary and clearly bullshit decisions happening to far better teachers and scholars than me, it just brings all that back. And I wouldn't wish it on anyone. /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Love living in a time where the main thing I'm thinking about when interviewed by a local paper about Black History Month is how much hate email and threatening voicemail I feel like dealing with.
For a bunch of people who are supposedly being silenced, the Right wingers sure don't shut the fuck up on my voicemail
(and I guarantee you what I get is just a fraction of what POC activists and educators do.)
Thread. I wonder how every Harvard faculty member who signed that letter of support can reconcile that with this. The 38 faculty (Gates, Bhaba, Beckett, Farmer, Kennedy, Greenblatt, the Jasanoffs, EVERY ONE OF THEM) who signed that letter should never be allowed to forget it.
Holy Christ, Harvard took the plaintiff's therapy records WITHOUT HER CONSENT and gave them TO HER PREDATOR. If you supported that, you should never work with students again.
Watch these endowed-chair cowards try and walk it back
TFW you read an otherwise good review essay about higher education but then run into this trope (from someone who ought to know better, frankly). thenation.com/article/societ…
If I see one more purportedly elite academic both-sides this thing...not being permitted to make rape jokes to female students is not similar to state suppression of curricular material. "People are being illiberal on both sides" is a fucking cop-out and you should be ashamed.
This is the highfalutin academics' equivalent of "but what about anti-white racism?" or "why don't you ever talk about black on black crime?" You're giving oxygen to absurdities, and flattening out power asymmetries to the point of malicious dishonesty.
Thanks @brennacgray for this thoughtful and important addition to the conversation. Critique is at the heart of what we do. I've certainly been disappointed to see attacks on folks' teaching abilities and ethos in response to their legitimate questions. That can't be it, y'all.
I just want folks to think about the good work that's going to be destroyed in service of short-term Twitter points. Please don't tell people who are legit concerned about a clearly questionable entity to "learn how to teach" when they point out those concerns.
I'm rooting for Sean to succeed. But I have serious concerns about CH, some of them drawn from personal experience. Both of these things are true, and I can hold them both together. If we extend Sean the benefit of the doubt, then the CH criticism has to get that benefit, too.
Senior VP for State and Local Partnerships at the @CollegeBoard, while leading efforts to destroy education on the state level. I don't think that's mission-driven work, y'all.