🚨 Late last night, new JFK Files totaling 14,321 pages in 161 files were released. I already have these processed, and segmented out for a .zip download, if you need them. Here are some important links (a 🧵): 👇
First, the main archive page on The Black Vault continues to be updated as new documents are released. This holds every known page to have been released over the years pertaining to the assassination, including other FBI files, and records of interest. theblackvault.com/documentarchiv…
Second, the 161 pages released on March 20, 2025, are available for a different download so you can easily determine what is new. NARA erroneously marked them all as being released on March 18 (as of this post) which makes it challenging to see what was new.
Why does NASA want to hide behind a FOIA (b)(5) exemption on what their November 2024 UAP/UFO meeting (briefing) was about, which included NASA's Office of Inspector General? 👇
The meeting was sparked by Peter Meister, on behalf of the Office of the Inspector General.
Mr. Meister is the Senior Science Policy Specialist within NASA's Science Mission Directorate (SMD). 👇
In order to get OIG briefed on UAPs in November 2024, just a few months ago, he reached out to Mark McInerney, the now FORMER NASA Director of UAP Research. 👇
🧵 In a recent private ticketed event, former DoD counterintelligence agent Luis Elizondo showed this photo of a "UFO" from Romania in 2022.
He called it a "real photo" and references it being described as a "mothership" like the one in Close Encounters of the Third Kind. 👇
I reverse imaged searched it, and eventually turned up a viral post on Facebook in a group called "Mysterious Ancient Discoveries". It got more than 182,000 likes and more than 23,700 comments. It was posted in September 2023.👇
But, it reminded me of something. Years ago, a photo went viral, which although did not look like this, I believe the process it was captured was the same.
Check out this. Through clouds - shot through a window, of a "UFO." It went viral, but the problem, was it wasn't real. 👇
🧵I feel this new pic is likely another model. But, the question is, what is the connection to the grander story being presented?
A hoax? Misunderstood or miscommunicated images? Maybe I can offer some type of explanation.
But first, here's the clip from last night:👇
This was the photo presented: 👇
I can't help but think this saucer is very similar (admittedly, not an exact match) to the saucers used in the 1956 Sci Fi classic film "Earth Vs. The Flying Saucers." 👇
Some people ask me why I am so interested in seeing the behind-the-scenes DOPSR review processes as connected to various claims by individuals inside (and outside) the UFO arena, but they are confused on why it's important. Bottom line: it can be revealing to help the public understand many things on many levels about the issues at hand.
So, here's an [admittedly long] thread on why, with verifiable examples.
But first, let me say, when it comes to @LueElizondo and David Grusch, their claims have been entrenched in controversy, regardless of what you believe about them and their claims. I am guessing (hoping?) that we can all at least ALL agree on that. Whether the DoD is lying, or someone else somewhere in the chain is lying to someone else, it's all downright controversial.
So, the DoD's treatment of these individuals, and their products/claims they seek to publish, would be incredibly revealing. And the DoD, along with the DOJ, has held nothing back in the past when it wants something suppressed.
So, this UFO topic, along with those making the claims, would be no different than it is with anything else. There is no "catch 22" if the DoD suppressed something as Grusch has claimed in the past. I've written extensively about that already. If the DoD wants to suppress something, they do, and the public is left in the dark.
Note: If there was information classified needing to be removed… I fully understand if certain portions of the review process cannot be released publicly. However, the fact that there were demands at all would be part of the story, at least in part.
So, here are some verifiable examples of former DoD personnel and top brass, and the problems they faced writing books and publishing their claims:
👇
“The Room Where It Happened,” by John Bolton, received an extraordinary amount of pushback. Bolton was even being sued by the DOJ as connected to it all, but that case was eventually dropped.
This example is well documented. Bolton claimed that the DOPSR review was being manipulated for political reasons. The National Security Council (NSC) reviewer, Ellen Knight, and her subsequent replacement, Michael Ellis, became central figures in the dispute. 👇
"No Easy Day" by Mark Owen [Matt Bissonnette] is an example of what happens when you don't go through the proper DOPSR review process.
The DoD claimed the book contained classified information and pursued legal action against him. As part of the settlement, Bissonnette agreed to forfeit a significant portion of his book's royalties to the U.S. government. While the full review paperwork wasn't publicly released, the legal proceedings and the Pentagon's response provided insight into the issues raised.
Bissonnette published a second book, "No Hero: the Evolution of a Navy SEAL," which did go through the proper channels and sections were redacted. 👇