The ideas being talked about didn’t come from the squad. Axios cites “transgender rights” as a problem for Dems in Virginia. That’s a mainstream Dem cause that predates the squad; and its advocate in Virginia last year was Maoist revolutionary Terry McAuliffe.
“The squad” grew out of Justice Democrats, which grew out of the Bernie 2016 campaign, which saw a lot of the identity politics Dems are now panicking about *used against it by the Clinton campaign.*
(deleted a version of that tweet w a typo because I was distracted by how nice my walk is this morning.)
Anyway, Dems are distancing themselves from some left-wing ideas, but two main problems for the party — voter exhaustion with the pandemic/restrictions, Manchin and Sinema blocking BBB — aren’t “squad” issues. (And the squad wants even a shrunk down BBB to pass.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Interesting @MattGertz (R-Fla) look at Fox News mostly ignoring the RNC's "legitimate political discourse" mess, the kind of party own-goal that usually gets coverage. Ignore it long enough and the question becomes: Why is the MSM covering this non-story? mediamatters.org/fox-news/fox-n…
Fox News's website hasn't covered the controversy at all; the lead story on the site rn is an aggregation of an Axios interview with Rep. Cori Bush, a BLM activist-turned-politician who says she still uses the "defund the police" slogan.
News judgment can be subjective, but the Cori Bush thing is just a left-wing Democrat reaffirming one of her left-wing takes. The RNC story is much more interesting, not just the disarray but the weird way that language got inserted into the resolution and passed.
The strangely opaque RNC process created problems for them here. The resolution doesn't even mention anything that happened on Jan. 6, just the Jan. 6 committee, saying Chenzinger are hurting the party by participating.
It's too clever by half, so the reference to "citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse" isn't explained. Rs say they mean stuff like subpoenas for fake electors, but the resolution didn't include any CYA language.
You know how Democrats refer to "the civil rights protests of 2020" and Republicans say "you're making excuses for the riots?" Yeah, well, they walked themselves right into the same rhetorical trap.
Really odd video if you've lived in DC. Even pre-covid, the area between the Archives/Navy stop and the start of Penn Quarter restaurants (about a block north of this spot) was dead on Sunday nights.
If he'd walked a block he could have gone to Oyamel. The decline of busting outdoor foot traffic is real, but this is a truly odd place to focus on, it's always been a Robert Kirkman script on Sunday evening.
None of this is to say DC has bounced back to 2019 levels of foot traffic/commerce. You could film the tens outside Union Station, you could set up a camera during the non-bustling downtown lunch hour. I was just amused at the decision to pick this classic dead zone.
Both of those would be huge events that occupy lots of news cycles - fate of Roe with bigger long-term effects, obviously.
It's stuff like this that makes me think 2024 speculation *in 2021* is crazy and (mostly) a waste of time.
(It's not a waste of time to track what party operatives are saying and who's working for who, but miss me with the "could Kamala be replaced by Buttigieg" stuff)