Remember that story about the Durham filing suggesting the Clinton campaign paid for "spying" on Trump communications before and after the presidency?
CNN and its co-conspirators morphed that into fake news. Here's how....
First, they debunk the claim the Clinton campaign paid for the data. The data was free. They don't mention that Clinton paid lawyers to go get the data to frame Trump (per Durham). That seems important.
Then CNN claims the data all came from before the Trump era. They don't tell you their "debunk" is irrelevant to the story because no one involved in framing Trump (allegedly) cared if the data was accurate. They only cared if it got the job done.
CNN never debunks the Durham claim that the Clinton campaign used fake data, obtained via their paid lawyers, to frame Trump and change the course of American politics. Some might call it an insurrection.
CNN and the NYTs also try the "it is old news" trick in which they prove there was a prior story on the topic (there was) but of course the prior story did not include all the good stuff we know now, such as Durham's allegations in the filing. But the reader will not know that.
It is remarkable and scary to watch the Fake News Industry effectively kill the first real "Worse than Watergate" story of the modern era. And they did it right in front of us. Successfully.
Update: We are asked to believe the Clinton campaign lawyer asked and received only Obama era data when his entire purpose was to frame Trump.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The "I told you so" crowd acts as if we aren't dealing with a far-less-killy-more-spready variant (possibly engineered) in the context of lots more data, vaccines preventing almost all hospital deaths, and dramatically better treatment options.
We're seeing Dunning-Kruger on steroids as the people who were never trained in risk-management got one right-- as they often do -- with the simple rule "Everything experts/politicians do makes things worse."
But that group is only "right" because they are pairing their predictions made under situation A with outcomes happening under situation B. And no, they didn't predict situation B, except in the most obvious ways.
Here are the trial results for using light as a disinfectant inside the body. It worked. Conclusion: Trump asked a well-informed question on a topic his own "experts" did not yet know about.
Here's the full transcript of Trump's comments about "injecting a disinfectant" inside the body. Note his references to light at the start and the end are typically edited out for the Fake News clips you have seen. Removing them changes the meaning.