Share this page!

Karen Vaites Profile picture
Twitter logo
Feb 19 • 7 tweets • 3 min read
A worrisome sign that #MedTwitter is broken:

In the Before Times, I bet you could get doctors like Freedman and the many health professionals reposting his thread to agree that this CDC change is bad. Poorly-executed, at minimum.

Now? Folks can only talk Mask Wars.
Let’s say that docs like @amychomd (who reposted it) believe the thread.

Can we not agree that this is crummy, anti-child communication by the CDC?

If the CDC is trying to emphasize the at-risk milestone, website changes like this are NOT getting it done.
What’s more, speech experts DO encourage Early Intervention at age 2 for severe speech delays, and I saw how EI changed my daughter’s life.

Most state EI programs end at age 3. Are we really all ready to cheer the CDC for elevating the 30 month milestone?

It feels anti-child.
Early Intervention is one of the most important principles and programs in all of children’s wellness.

If there were no Mask Wars, wouldn’t we likely agree that pushing back the timing of evaluations of children is a bad thing on its own merits?
That dissonance btwn ASHA/states & CDC/AAP is confusing?

That if CDC’s really worried about the 30 month milestone, they should be broadcasting need for urgent screening on website?

Watching doctors de-center the impact on vulnerable children to dunk on Vinay is disturbing.
And please don’t let anyone tell you that there is a whole pile of evidence supporting the speech milestone, and that’s why they are all going to the wall for it.

It’s a tribal reaction I don’t fully understand, not a reflection of weight of evidence.
👇
Glad that I am not the only one seeing this issue.

Thread.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Karen Vaites

Karen Vaites Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @karenvaites

Karen Vaites Profile picture
Feb 19
Yesterday, I held off talking about the CDC speech guidance change BC I noticed a thing when I was searching Twitter for more info.

👀
There are more than the 7 shown here.

Search this phrase in Twitter, you’ll see:

The CDC just quietly lowered the standards for speech in early childhood development.

Now children should know ~50 words at 30mo rather than 24mo.
Generally, I try to do my homework and only tweet after reading articles, or when I have evidence for thing I am claiming.

I felt like it was a little odd that I didn’t hear back with much of substance when I asked for more info… that was Hmmm number one.
Read 5 tweets
Karen Vaites Profile picture
Feb 19
I've been digging into claims that @CDCgov recently lowered its bar for children's speech development.

CDC did change milestones. Today, it's out of line with @ASHAWeb & NY State.

Importantly, these other orgs haven't changed any guidance during the pandemic.

Let's unpack.
Now, I'm not a speech pathologist, nor do I play one on Twitter. But literacy advocates & Speech & Language Pathologists share common advocacy terrain, so I Know People.

I had many conversations today with SLP friends. The universal refrain:

@ASHAWeb is the Gold Standard.
The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (@ASHAWeb) is clear that "saying fewer than 50 words" when a child is two years old is a sign of a "language problem."

See:
asha.org/public/early-i…
Read 32 tweets
Karen Vaites Profile picture
Feb 18
This is a really important piece by @natwexler.

First and foremost, it's the only reporting I've seen on a major achievement by @TNedu:

Almost all Tennessee districts now use high-quality curriculum! That's HUGE.

forbes.com/sites/nataliew…
Increasing use of high-quality curriculum is a longtime goal of many states. In fact, 13 states participate in @CCSSO's High-Quality Instructional Materials and Professional Development (IMPD) network, squarely focused on this goal.

TN is one of the 13...
learning.ccsso.org/high-quality-i…
And so far, it's the biggest success story, given this traction.

In 2019-20, I had a chance to visit six of the pioneers in this work with the #KnowledgeMatters School Tour, and the local leadership was abundant.

Here was one thread – it's long, but...+
Read 8 tweets
Karen Vaites Profile picture
Feb 17
As we near 2 yr anniversary of US COVID restrictions, borne most heavily by children…

Docs speaking out for normalcy for kids find their home locations & kids’ details posted online by anonymous trolls.

In viciously personal threads that get amplified by PH Twitter giants.
I’m not going to give one more eyeball to the thread by linking to it. Good for Twitter for removing the doxxing Tweets and at least Gonsalves came to his senses.

But this is what passes for discourse in America. For advocating for approaches already successful in Europe.
I will, however, amplify these replies to Gonsalves,

Because they are 🎯.
Read 4 tweets
Karen Vaites Profile picture
Feb 17
There’s something exceptionally important about the design flaws of the two most popular curricula in K-12 education:

👉 They track children in kindergarten.

That makes them structurally ableist, and some would say racist.

Let’s unpack.
The main reason kids don’t get enough work with books at their grade level:

These curricula put kids into leveled reading groups, in which they do their literacy lessons with books at that level.

When you go into classrooms, you find kids in low, medium, and high groups.
It’s treated like a smart, even scientific approach.

But there is zero evidence that it works, and compelling evidence that challenging all kids with books at their grade level develops reading skills more effectively. More info summarized here:

eduvaites.org/2019/11/02/lev…
Read 8 tweets
Karen Vaites Profile picture
Feb 16
This piece continues the @nytimes coverage pattern when it comes to K-12 education:

An over-weighting of identity politics, to the exclusion of other major issues concerning parents.

🧵

By @thomasfullerNYT:
nytimes.com/2022/02/16/us/…
Did you know that San Francisco declined to reopen schools in Fall, 2020 even though local COVID positivity was less than 1%… even as other districts opened at similar (in NYC) and higher (in sun belt) rates?

The NYT piece does not tell you this.
Did you know that SF schools remained closed until Spring, 2021… as most schools across the US reopened? (Reminder: 60% of US schools had opened by mid-October ‘20.)

And that SF parents protested the closures at the time?

@thomasfullerNYT doesn’t get into these details.
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @karenvaites has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @karenvaites!

Read all threads by @karenvaites

:(