Thread; A few things have been bubbling through my head while scrolling through Twitter recently about community, identity, engagement and being #ActuallyAutistic on this site. Bear with me as this may be a bit disjointed. 1/
Recently I have seen friends be attacked for not following a particular line. I was attacked because others don't like someone I am friends with and I have seen people worry that they don't fit in, because they don't have all the same traits as someone else. 2/
I count myself as lucky. I have a handful of wonderful friends offline who I can go months without talking to, and then just pick up again as if we spoke every day. I find constant communication with people quite hard though. 3/
Twitter is good for that. I have people on here who I would class as friends. People I will support and a community of sorts. I know others can struggle with that though. It can cause them to seek out communities which unfortunately end up being quite toxic. 4/
Reason I added #ActuallyAutistic to the initial point, despite it being something which can affect anyone, is because I saw a post off a wonderful, kind, person worrying about imposter syndrome because they don't have the same trait as a lot of other autistic individuals. 5/
It was this coupled with other things that got my mind working. I'm "lucky" I have a formal diagnosis. Even so I still question it at times because I don't fit neatly into the stereotypical box for being autistic. 6/
I have no "superpowers". I'm not rainman. I'm just average. I'm happy with that, but there is a presumption that all autistic individuals have to act the same way, and frankly we really don't. The spectrum is more of a pick and mix scatter graph than a straight line. 7/
I also saw people being attacked by the followers of someone who I can only describe as a hashtag variant of Nurse Ratched, because they dared to criticise the methods that person was applying. 8/
All that said, Twitter has helped me find a community of people I trust, something I struggle with. That has made it difficult when at times people within that community turn out to be less than trustworthy, but overall the positives outweigh the negatives. 9/
What is important though, in my opinion, is remembering that people online are still just people. We will agree and disagree, often with friends, on some things but not others. Just because you disagree it doesn't make you "the enemy". 10/
None of us, if we are truly honest, will conform in absolutely every way to someone else. We are all unique and have different thoughts. Some online communities get that. Some gate keep to such an extent that the slightest deviation means vilification. 11/
It's a wishful thought, but a bit more understanding. A bit more tolerance. A bit less instinctive defensiveness and going on the attack, and we'd all be a bit more comfortable and relaxed on here, and maybe actually learn things and gain new viewpoints. 12/
Finding an identity can be really useful in helping us develop confidence. My main point here though is that our identities are as individual as ourselves and we should never think we have to blindly conform to others ideas just to fit in. 13/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of the many things about Katharine Birbalsingh which doesn't just make her a bad teacher, but makes her an actual danger to children, is that she writes kids off from the start, based on who their parents are, or their uniqueness and abilities etc. 1/
I have known teachers like her when I was growing up. They are ableist, dismissive and harmful. They break kids. They leave serious mental scars and they destroy lives. They shouldn't be allowed within a 100 miles of a classroom. 2/
They are the teachers who tell a child that they won't amount to anything because that child doesn't fit the weird little model that they have created in their own minds. They are the teacher who puts a child off reading because they tell them they are stupid. 3/
Promised my wife lobster for her birthday, and yeah... Why?
Okay, starting with the butter, because you know...not as worrying if I mess it up. Garlic, chilli, lemon, parsley and butter, even I can mix those together. Well, you'd hope.
Okay, going in. "Break the spine and crack the ribs". This is a little too much like my grandfather's advise for dealing with bullies. Didn't stand a chance then, probably not going to fair much better now.
Something to say about the age assessment debate yesterday in the @UKHouseofLords. Lord Hodgson complained that Baroness Bennett disregarded "evidence" from Migration Watch, an easy thing to do based on Migration Watch's track record. 1/
More importantly is how both he and Baroness Neville-Rolfe disregarded evidence from medical experts, social workers, child centred NGO's etc. Implementing the current proposals for age assessments with a "review" after a year, as they suggest, would place children at risk. 2/
In the space of that year how many children will be incorrectly classified as adults, something which when it happens is incredibly hard to appeal, and will become harder under proposals in the Judicial Review Bill. 3/
"It isn't about changing the refugee convention. It is about amending it" That is akin to someone being charged with breaking and entering claiming they were just "interpreting the law". The UK's #BordersBill clearly and unambiguously violates international law.
"interpreting" not "amending"
For many people changing the wording from "reasonable likelihood" to "balance of probability" may sound like semantics, but in reality makes it far more difficult for those fleeing persecution to be granted asylum by the nature of the higher burden of proof which will be required
Offshore detention doesn't "deter" asylum seekers. It does put them at risk and undermine the UK's obligations to international law. The mental and physical toll which it places on asylum seekers leaves lasting damage, as well as costing lives. #BordersBill
The "Australian model", and evidence supplied by the Australian High Commission, is not supported by the evidence seen on the ground. Offshoring is ineffective, costly and inhumane. More than all this though, it costs lives. kaldorcentre.unsw.edu.au/publication/po…
"Offshoring" asylum seekers would result in an effective denial of rights and would leave asylum seekers in limbo. More than that though, offshoring has been shown by its nature is not "temporary". It is a denial of status and an abhorrent attack against refugees.
We really need mainstream media outlets publishing easily accessible, non-political, pieces about refugees to help ensure public are properly informed and harmful misinformation is debunked, before we see a re-run of what happened on the Belarusian/Polish border for starters. 1/
Just in relation to situation with Ukraine, we're already seeing hyperbolic and misleading information, as shown above. In a more general sense so, misleading information and language has become so normalised that even those who ostensibly feel for refugees think it is genuine 2/
Even something as innocuous as refering to asylum seekers as "migrants", technically correct, but more importantly has the underlying effect of ignoring the very specific rights which refugees are granted and the difference between asylum and immigration systems. 3/