Look, there's been *another* massive banking leak, this one from @CreditSuisse, showing complicity in laundering money for the world's greatest monsters: human traffickers, despots, criminals. They're calling it #SuisseSecrets.
They had to call it that, because #SwissLeaks was already taken, for the 2015 @UBS leaks that revealed UBS's complicity in the same fucking thing. 2/
As @jneiman77 - lawyer for the Credit Suisse whistleblowers - told @theguardian, "How many rogue bankers do you need to have before you start having a rogue bank?" 3/
I'd add, given that this rot extends beyond Credit Suisse to UBS and undoubtably further, "How many rogue bankes do you need to have before you start having a rogue banking system?" 4/
The friend who emailed me about this wrote, "After so many of these, I am accepting that these leaks don't matter, and that those in power don't actually want to fix the system. Sunlight isn't doing any disinfecting at all."
[...[ 5/
He's not wrong, but that's not the whole story.
The problem isn't the *transparency*, it's the *inaction*. 6/
They money laundering revealed in Suisse Secrets abetted the worst criminals on Earth, like Nigerian dictator Sani Abacha, who looted $5b from his people and laundered hundreds of millions (or more) through Credit Suisse. 7/
Abacha is in good company - CS also laundered for the Marcoses and their bagman, and other looters from Syria to Madagascar.
Also mafiosi, killers, human traffickers, embezzlers, fraudsters, corrupters and worse. 8/
The facts laid out in the Guardian story (and stories in partner outlets like @SZ), there is no question that Credit Suisse knew whose money they were handling, and knew just how dirty it was. 9/
What's more, the reporting makes it abundantly clear that Swiss banking secrecy is designed and maintained for the express purpose of laundering this blood money. 10/
Despite Swiss officials' claims to have ended banking secrecy, the country is still a rogue state, a criminal haven. 11/
It's not only failing to end money-laundering, it's encouraging it: Switzerland is *broadening* its banking secrecy law to allow it to punish whistleblowers who reveal the nation's role in global finance crime:
Yeah, we kind of knew all of this. The leaks - SwissLeaks, LuxLeaks, IRS Files, Panama Papers, Paradise Papers, Pandora Papers - keep revealing that the marble facades of the world's greatest banks are holding back oceans of blood and misery:
Knowing about it isn't enough. But knowing about it is *a start*. 15/
The knowledge we've gained from the reporting on these leaks - reporting at great expense and risk, which has resulted in a journalist's assassination - isn't the reason for the inaction. 16/
Indeed, if the action ever comes, it will be *because* of this reporting. You can't solve a problem until you know it exists.
A truism of the free/open source world is that "with enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow." That is, with enough scrutiny, a solution will emerge. 17/
That idea came under enormous strain with 2014's #Heartbleed Bug. A widely used free/open web infrastructure had a longstanding bug, out there in plain sight. The code was there for anyone to scrutinize, but no one had looked hard enough to find it.
That was a wakeup call for the community. It wasn't enough to simply publish sourcecode for important infrastructure. We had to build and fund *systems* that would audit that code. 19/
Having the code where anyone could see it would make their job easier, but the job wouldn't do itself. 20/
We got lucky with Heartbleed. The good guys found it before it was ever exploited in the wild, and they coordinated a massive, global upgrade that patched the majority of webservers before the bug was disclosed. 21/
But we didn't get so lucky the next time. When the #Log4j bug was discovered last November, it was already too late. We'd hit snooze on Heartbleed's wakeup call and holy shit had we ever overslept:
Competent, serious people are worried about the vulnerabilities presented by the software that underpins our digital world, but none of them argue that the problem with that software is that it's available for inspection. 23/
The problem is that we don't inspect or act on it in a systemic, coordinated way. We don't take it seriously.
We should take it seriously.
The problem isn't that we know about these deep and worrying flaws. The problem is that we're not doing anything about them. 24/
Knowing these specifics - whether it's Log4j or SuisseSecrets - is the necessary, but insufficient condition for change.
These leaks are claim-checks on the people who sold us out. Someday, we'll collect on them. 25/
ETA - If you'd like an unrolled version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
This week on my podcast, I read the final part of "The Internet Heist," my @Medium series on the copyright wars' early days, when the entertainment and tech giants tried to leverage the digital TV transition into a veto over every part of our lives.
In Part I, I described the bizarre #BroadcastFlag project, where Hollywood studios and Intel colluded with a corrupt congressman (later @PhRMA's top lobbyist) to ban any digital product unless it had DRM and blocked free/open source software:
In Part II, I recount the failure of the Broadcast Flag (killed by a unanimous Second Circuit decision), and how the studios pivoted to "plugging the #AnalogHole": mandatory kill-switches for recorders to block recording of copyrighted works:
"Innovation" is in very bad odor these days. "Disruption" is even more disreputable. 1/
But as tech and the global south researcher @qadrida writes in @wired, "innovation" isn't limited to inventing unregulated banks and calling them "fintech" and "disruption" is more than just misclassifying employees as contractors.
Qadri studies workers who are seizing the means of computation, reverse-engineering and repurposing the apps that are meant to keep them in bondage and setting themselves free. Her research on gig drivers in Jakarta is essential reading: