"Innovation" is in very bad odor these days. "Disruption" is even more disreputable. 1/
But as tech and the global south researcher @qadrida writes in @wired, "innovation" isn't limited to inventing unregulated banks and calling them "fintech" and "disruption" is more than just misclassifying employees as contractors.
Qadri studies workers who are seizing the means of computation, reverse-engineering and repurposing the apps that are meant to keep them in bondage and setting themselves free. Her research on gig drivers in Jakarta is essential reading:
Indonesian drivers have banded together to build clubhouses that serve as break-rooms, union halls, tech workshops and scooter maintenance depots. 4/
These centers are the birthplace of #tuyul apps, which allow workers to resist algorithmic "optimization" and adapt their working conditions to improve their pay and safety. 5/
In her new piece, Qadri cites other "tech workers" - low-waged, casualized workers, dispatched and managed by apps - who use technology to take back control, from "farmers who strike against a smart city plan" to riders who band together to get back their stolen scooters. 6/
This is mutual aid, with code. It is every bit as innovative and disruptive as Uber or Amazon, but because it is done *by* workers, rather than *to* workers, it is not recognized as such. 7/
Indeed, when workers modify the apps that script their movements, they're called "criminals," not "innovators." 8/
Take @Doordash's smear campaign against Para, an app that let delivery drivers find out how much a job paid before they took it (Doordash hides compensation from drivers in hopes of tricking them into taking unprofitable runs):
Doordash called Para a criminal app, baselessly accused it of identity theft, and insisted that drivers had no right to know how much they were going to get paid before they committed to a job. 10/
But as Para shows, seizing the means of computation is an important strategy for workers seeking a better life. The tactics of #AdversarialInteroperability (AKA #CompetitiveCompatibility or #Comcom) can transfer power from Goliaths to Davids:
But the *soi-disant* disruptors of the business world will not tolerate being disrupted themselves. 12/
Uber is content to skirt labor, safety and transportation policy, but would scream bloody murder if drivers and riders hacked the app to make it obsolete:
ETA - If you'd like an unrolled version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
This week on my podcast, I read the final part of "The Internet Heist," my @Medium series on the copyright wars' early days, when the entertainment and tech giants tried to leverage the digital TV transition into a veto over every part of our lives.
In Part I, I described the bizarre #BroadcastFlag project, where Hollywood studios and Intel colluded with a corrupt congressman (later @PhRMA's top lobbyist) to ban any digital product unless it had DRM and blocked free/open source software:
In Part II, I recount the failure of the Broadcast Flag (killed by a unanimous Second Circuit decision), and how the studios pivoted to "plugging the #AnalogHole": mandatory kill-switches for recorders to block recording of copyrighted works:
Look, there's been *another* massive banking leak, this one from @CreditSuisse, showing complicity in laundering money for the world's greatest monsters: human traffickers, despots, criminals. They're calling it #SuisseSecrets.
They had to call it that, because #SwissLeaks was already taken, for the 2015 @UBS leaks that revealed UBS's complicity in the same fucking thing. 2/
As @jneiman77 - lawyer for the Credit Suisse whistleblowers - told @theguardian, "How many rogue bankers do you need to have before you start having a rogue bank?" 3/