#UCOBank
There are three terms "Pardanashin" "Burkha Clad" and "ones wering Hijab" legal stand point is clear on "Pardanashin" and are in protected category as per Indian Contract Act 1872 as well!
1/n
There are three terms "Pardanashin" "Burkha Clad" and "ones wering Hijab" legal stand point is clear on "Pardanashin" and are in protected category as per Indian Contract Act 1872 as well!
1/n
However it is categorically said that just because one wears Burkha doesn't imply her to be "Pardanashin"!
2/n
2/n
In Satish Chandra vs. Kali Dasi it was said that a woman of rank who lives in seclusion, shut in the Zenana, having no communication except behind the parda or screen with any male persons save a few near relations.
3/n
3/n
In banking there is special category of account opened by Pardanashin and In my 8 years of banking career I have not seen even a single such account!
4/n
4/n
A women wearing veil or burkha can claim to be pardanashin only when:
She is illiterate;
She is ignorant as she has never set a foot in the outside world.
5/n
She is illiterate;
She is ignorant as she has never set a foot in the outside world.
5/n
In case of UCO bank fiasco if she has opened her account as Pardanashin a male person cannot ask her to show her face and there would have been signature of male member from her family uploaded in the system!
6/n
6/n
But I doubt that was the case! If however she was someone wearing Burkha but was not Pardanashin then in case of doubt Identity needs to be established!
7/n
7/n
Most importantly what I heard in the video is that women was claiming that she was asked to take off hijab (hijab coveres only head not face) and my rationality is not allowing me to think any banker would ask anyone that!
Its time of restraint and love don't give in to hate!
8
Its time of restraint and love don't give in to hate!
8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
