"What Rufo has been cleverly doing is cherry-picking the worst examples that he can find of lessons in classrooms or training materials for teachers and saying, 'that is CRT' ... And the thing is—it fucking worked."

Even my enemies can't help but give me the W.
John Oliver spent 28 minutes hyperventilating about the anti-CRT movement, repeating the dumbest tropes, like "CRT is graduate-level legal theory" and never taught in K-12 schools. But he's doing us an unintentional favor: the more the public learns about CRT, the more we win.
According to Democratic Party pollsters, 61 percent of swing district voters agree with the statement: "Democrats are teaching kids as young as five Critical Race Theory, which teaches that America is a racist country and that white people are racist."
The reality is that my voice is much more powerful than John Oliver's. The NYT, WaPo, CNN, and MSNBC have been lying about CRT for the past year—and the public doesn't believe them.

We have the truth on our side and we will win. ⚔️
P.S. The reason John Oliver and Trevor Noah aren't funny is because, traditionally, the court jester is supposed to mock the nobility; Oliver and Noah, by contrast, sneer at the population "below" them.

They're not a challenge to power; they're a mouthpiece for power.
The delight of political comedy comes from the assumption of risk. The jester, if he errs, might get beheaded by the king. He goes right up to that line and, consequently, has the audience in rapt attention.

Oliver and Noah risk nothing: they are bland propaganda for the regime.
This is also the reason they hate Joe Rogan. Rogan is rich and famous, but he has a vox populi-style appeal and chooses to hang out with déclassé lunatics like Alex Jones. He's constantly pushing the boundaries of elite opinion, assuming real risks. And he's funny.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @realchrisrufo

Feb 17
"In America, I can do anything I want and I teach that to my children. And the person who teaches my little pecan-colored kids that they're somehow oppressed based on the color of their skin would be absolutely wrong and absolutely at war with me."
There are two competing philosophies right now:

• One says America is systemically racist and your skin color determines your outcomes.

• Another says America is a land of progress and you can chart your own future through your human agency.

Choose one—and choose wisely.
I've created the Critical Race Theory Briefing Book, which includes everything you need to know about critical race theory and how to fight it in your community.
christopherrufo.com/crt-briefing-b…
Read 4 tweets
Feb 3
Ladies and gentlemen, "The Conservative Case for Critical Race Theory."
As recently as a few years ago, French called critical race theory "racial poison" that "leads to sheer cruelty and malice." He said its practitioners were manipulative "preacher-like personalities" and its followers were "vicious" activists who even sent him death threats.
He could have been president.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 1
Whoopi Goldberg said on television what critical race theorists have been saying in print for years.
philpapers.org/archive/BERCWS…
It's the same logic with Asian-Americans: they are categorized as part of "multiracial whiteness" in order to maintain the critical race theorists' pre-conceived hierarchy of oppression, which, by definition, puts "whiteness" at the top.
The ultimate problem with critical race theory is that it's essentialist and reductive: it seeks to subordinate individuals into crude racial categories, which are used to justify its political program of race-based neo-Marxism.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 27
This story is fake news: the book was swapped out from the 8th grade curriculum, not "banned." The board voted to find a better book for the Holocaust and said they'd even use Maus again if they don't find a good replacement.

Judd Legum is the Jussie Smollett of journalism.
The Left is always using the ratchet method of argumentation, which ends up as: "If this thing we like isn't mandatory and subsidized by the taxpayer, that's censorship/banning/fascism." It's bunk. Don't fall for it.
I personally wouldn't have a problem with my child reading Maus in 8th grade, but I respect that other communities have different preferences. The journalistic culture of the NYT shouldn't colonize the curriculum of a small school in Tennessee. Pluralism means difference.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 25
The brilliance of Glenn Youngkin's executive order on critical race theory is that it merely clarifies and strengthens existing civil rights law.

Now the Left has to take the unenviable position of opposing the principles of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The "centrist" argument that anti-critical race theory legislation is "censorship" is bunk for the same reason. The Civil Rights Act already restricts speech in schools and workplaces. Do the centrists support abolishing it? And if not, are they, too, enemies of "free speech"?
The real innovation for the New Right is to strengthen civil rights laws to protect *all groups* and stop ceding administrative authority to the left-wing bureaucrats who dominate the existing civil rights apparatus. Youngkin is executing on this beautifully.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 24
In 1968, UC Berkeley hired Eldridge Cleaver, a convicted felon and Black Panther leader who called raping white women "an insurrectionary act," to teach a course as part of its inaugural Black Studies program.

The left-wing revolution has always been subsidized by taxpayers.
The "coddling of the American mind" thesis is dead-wrong. The precursors to "wokeness" were already in place during the 1960s. They simply adapted the language of "white privilege," etc., as a method of social manipulation. It's feigned weakness as a strategy to accumulate power.
In a sense, Cleaver and the other antecedents of "wokeness" were at least honest about their intentions and their methods. They advocated pure revolution, which has now been passed through the language of HR and psychotherapy.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(