FWIW, I think "culture war concessions" works only at the level of the candidate, not at the level of policy -- when it works at all. Nothing could ever have convinced America that Obama was socially conservative, even though he was and is.
Biden is making all kinds of compromises and concessions on immigration, and no one is recognizing it or caring (except for progressives who notice and get mad).
You saw the same exact pattern with Jimmy Carter. By the end of his presidency he had tacked so far to the Right that progressives primaried him with Ted Kennedy and almost won. But Republicans kept on thinking he was leftism incarnate.
I think Republican voters DON'T think Biden is leftism incarnate. They're just really mad about culture stuff and don't care about Biden as a person. To them he might as well be named Brandon. It's Twitter activists and street activists the GOP fears and hates.
Because culture-war concessions are mostly about candidates rather than policies, if Dems are to make culture-war concessions it's going to have to be at the local and state level, where they can quickly pivot to embracing politicians like Eric Adams.
Having Biden or Harris or Pelosi or other national Dems come out and say culturally conservative stuff seems unlikely to matter; if you want to make concessions, run local pols like Eric Adam who will throw more money at cops and refuse to say "Latinx", etc. etc.
And always remember that the right-wing outrage machine never stops running at full blast, it just changes its target. If Biden stops hiring Black people, no one will notice except angry progressives; right-wing outrage will simply refocus on something else.
Thus, even if you'd be perfectly willing to make culture-war concessions in exchange for Dem electoral victories and/or economic policy wins, consider the likelihood that at the national level, no such trade is on offer.
(end)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/Everyone talks about diverse casting in shows like Witcher, Wheel of Time, LotR, etc. like it's all because of wokeness.
But I think the biggest factor is that producers want to show audiences a world where the people look like the people those audiences are used to seeing.
2/I live in a country where the people are about 60% white, 20% Hispanic, and 20% Black, Asian, and other. And I have spent most of my adult life living in cities that more or less reflected that ethnic mix.
That is what is "normal" for me to look around and see.
2/If I am in a place where everyone is white, I don't think "Ahh, the people around me look normal". I think "I am in a foreign country." Because I can't even remember being in such an environment in the U.S.
Agreed. Sorry, Italians, we have appropriated your food and made it ours. But in turn, we will lose ownership of pizza to Japan, when broccoli-corn-mayonnaise pizza becomes the global norm!
It's good to see lots of leftists backpedaling their embrace of Russia's victim narrative and condemning Putin's move in Donbas.
Apparently they were betting that the Russian buildup was all for show and no invasion would happen.
As long as it was all just posturing and show, they thought they could use it to score points against liberals by exploiting Last War Brain and claiming that U.S. anger over the buildup was somehow similar to the Iraq War.
Obviously tankies will keep pushing the Kremlin line, but mainstream leftists will distance themselves from that line. Expect to see tankies shift to attacking mainstream leftists, as they attacked Bernie for criticizing Russia the other day.
3/Biden got off to a good start, passing a Covid relief bill that included a pioneering Child Tax Credit similar to Canada's successful program, passing an infrastructure bill that repaired roads and did some other good stuff, and passing a semiconductor industry support bill.
1. NYC building styles range from "fairly ugly" to "very ugly", but Americans love them because NYC is our only dense city, so Americans associate those building styles with urban density
2. Star Trek DS9 was neocon. It glorified a morally inspired leader engaging in preemptive war with an enemy who would never see reason and only respected force.