3/Biden got off to a good start, passing a Covid relief bill that included a pioneering Child Tax Credit similar to Canada's successful program, passing an infrastructure bill that repaired roads and did some other good stuff, and passing a semiconductor industry support bill.
4/But his big follow-up, the Build Back Better bill, was stymied in the Senate by Joe Manchin, who withheld his crucial swing vote.
The most obvious explanation is just the intransigence of old old conservative Democratic senators.
But I think there are also deeper forces at play here.
8/First, I think Dems approached BBB in a suboptimal way, turning it into a kitchen-sink bill that appeased all their interest groups but was very difficult to sell to the public.
7/If you think I'm exaggerating how clumsy the Dems' approach was, consider the fact that the most expensive item in the bill was a tax cut for the wealthy and upper middle class.
8/The whole thing should have just been climate investment and child tax credit from day 1. But this kind of focus is rarely possible for Democrats, because of their structural political issues.
9/The third reason BBB stalled, in addition to Manchin and the Dems' structural issues, was inflation.
No, BBB wouldn't have added much to inflation, if at all. It didn't raise deficits enough.
But people don't know that. And inflation is scaring them.
10/A fourth reason is a general attitude of conservative reaction in America, exemplified by the massive increases in police budgets across the country.
12/And unfortunately, even when we look at the best and most impactful pieces of the bill, they weren't that popular. Americans tended to oppose making the expanded Child Tax Credit -- the closest thing we're likely to get to a Universal Basic Income -- permanent.
13/It's my belief that Americans have become afflicted with a "scarcity mindset", in which the worry that someone undeserving will get even a dollar of government benefits overrides the desire to help the country as a whole.
14/As for climate, most Americans probably still think that taking action on climate means making material sacrifices. This is no longer true, thanks to technological advancements. But the idea that "climate policy = degrowth" persists, and Americans are in no mood for degrowth.
15/So Bidenomics has been stymied in terms of actual policy.
But it's worth remembering that FDR and Reagan also both got stymied, and it fell to later Presidents to complete their policy programs.
16/We need Bidenomics because investment (both private and public) is falling, which will make us poorer in the future.
17/We need Bidenomics because a world of 3C of warming -- which is now "business as usual" -- would be hugely disruptive to our way of life. Even 2.4C, which is what we'll get with current promised policies, is too high.
18/And we need Bidenomics because cash benefits are, in most cases, a much better way to run a welfare state than the kludge of bewildering and inefficient means testing and work requirements we have now.
19/So while Biden's agenda has been stalled (and likely will be stalled even more when Republicans take back one or both houses of Congress in 2022), the IDEA of Bidenomics needs to survive, because it's the way forward for our country.
20/Ideologies and policy programs exist to combat the problems of the day. And Bidenomics emerged because the present era's problems demand this sort of approach.
FWIW, I think "culture war concessions" works only at the level of the candidate, not at the level of policy -- when it works at all. Nothing could ever have convinced America that Obama was socially conservative, even though he was and is.
Biden is making all kinds of compromises and concessions on immigration, and no one is recognizing it or caring (except for progressives who notice and get mad).
You saw the same exact pattern with Jimmy Carter. By the end of his presidency he had tacked so far to the Right that progressives primaried him with Ted Kennedy and almost won. But Republicans kept on thinking he was leftism incarnate.
1. NYC building styles range from "fairly ugly" to "very ugly", but Americans love them because NYC is our only dense city, so Americans associate those building styles with urban density
2. Star Trek DS9 was neocon. It glorified a morally inspired leader engaging in preemptive war with an enemy who would never see reason and only respected force.
All the usual suspects are jumping all over Lisa Cook's paper from 2014 and pointing out small errors. But Ken Rogoff served on the Fed Board of Governors and I bet you nobody combed over his papers for errors before he was confirmed! And I bet you he made a few.
Econ academia has very little quality control for data errors. When people do comb over papers for mistakes, they generally find them.
We need a Xillennial-Zillennial alliance, of people who are just a little too old for Millennial bullshit and people who just are a little too young for Millennial bullshit.
Anyone who was born 1980-1986 or 1997-2003 is in the Xillennial-Zillennial alliance. We must unite against the people whose brains were broken by coming of age between the Great Recession and Trump.
The people in that middle decade shall be known as the Harry Potter Generation
To the people who respond to every horrific murder with "We need better mental health": Please tell me what specific mental disorder you think these murderers have, and what you think the standard of care for that disorder is.
I have met tons of people with mental issues -- depressed people, schizophrenics, people with bipolar disorder -- and I have never met even *one* who had done anything like follow someone into their house and murder them, or who seemed at all likely to do such a thing.
Frankly, it is insulting and stigmatizing to people with mental health issues to say that brutal killers are just struggling with mental health. Most people with mental health issues are very sweet people.