The Republican Party is embracing authoritarianism. There can be no “politics as usual.”

Why do so many Democratic leaders ignore the nature of the political conflict and still expect an imminent return to “normalcy”?

My new column for @GuardianUS:
President Joe Biden likes to celebrate his friendship with Mitch McConnell, which is weirdly at odds with the political situation – but captures the stark asymmetry in the way the two sides treat each other quite precisely.
Republicans are engaged in an authoritarian assault on the political system, embrace extremists who fantasize about committing acts of violence against Democrats, and plan on finding a reason, any reason, to impeach Joe Biden as soon as they get the chance.
Biden, on the other hand, has been mostly reluctant to make the fight against the GOP’s assault on democracy the center piece of his agenda; Democratic leadership has proved mostly unwilling to focus the public’s attention on the Republican Party’s authoritarian turn.
How can we explain that many Democrats act as if politics as usual is still an option and a return to “normalcy” imminent, even as Republicans could not be clearer about the fact that they consider Democratic governance fundamentally illegitimate?
One important explanatory factor is age: Many Democratic leaders came up in a very different political environment, when there was indeed a great deal of bipartisan cooperation in Congress – and they are longing for a return to the days of amity across party lines.
Crucially, this inability to grapple in earnest with the post-Obama reality in which Democratic politicians are almost universally considered members of an “Un-American” faction by most Republicans has deeper ideological roots.
Some establishment Democrats seem to feel a kinship with their Republican opponents grounded in a worldview of white elite centrism and status-quo ideology – they seem to believe that it is high time to push back against the “radical” forces of “leftism” and “wokeism.”
The constant attempts to normalize a radicalizing Republican Party also have a lot to do with two foundational myths that have always shaped the collective imaginary: the myth of American exceptionalism and the myth of white innocence.
Much of the Democratic elite still subscribes to an exceptionalist understanding that America is fundamentally good and inexorably on its way to overcoming whatever vestigial problems there might still be.
It builds on a mythical tale of America’s past, describing democracy as old, consolidated, and exceptionally stable, ignoring the fact that multiracial democracy started not even 60s years ago. Acknowledging what the GOP has become goes against the pillars of that worldview.
Finally, the American political discourse is still shaped by the paradigm of white innocence. Economic anxiety, anti-elite backlash, or just liberals being mean – whatever animates white people’s extremism, it must not be racism and they cannot be blamed for their actions.
The idea of white innocence also clouds the perspective on Republican elites: Since they cannot possibly be animated by reactionary white nationalism, they must be motivated by more benign forces – maybe they are just cowards, or they’re being seduced by the mean demagogue.
“I actually like Mitch McConnell,” Biden said during a press conference a few weeks ago, providing a window into what he sees in Republicans: No matter what they do, underneath they’re good guys, they’ll snap out of it. Any minute now, promise.
It’s the manifestation of a specific worldview that makes it nearly impossible to acknowledge the depths of GOP radicalization. The survival of American democracy might depend on whether or not Democrats can accept that there can be no more politics as usual.

More here:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Zimmer

Thomas Zimmer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tzimmer_history

Feb 20
This is a key point. Every time I mention how the Right is embracing the threat of political violence against supposedly “Un-American” enemies, I get a flurry of “Where were you when those woke barbarians destroyed our cities?! The violence is coming from the Left!!!” replies.
This has become dogma on the Right: That the country is facing an onslaught from a radically “Un-American,” extremist “Left” that is violently threatening to destroy everything the nation is supposed to stand for. And that the Democratic Party has been taken over by those forces.
That’s how they’re giving themselves permission to embrace whatever radical measures are deemed necessary to defeat this “Un-American” enemy. If the nation is under acute threat, nothing is beyond the pale to defend it. Democracy? The rule of law? Who cares!
Read 9 tweets
Feb 19
I just rolled my eyes so hard I’m dizzy…

“Squad politics”

I mean, politics aside, this is quite bizarre. There is absolutely no evidence presented here. None. A purely ideological statement, masquerading as “journalism.”
I don’t disagree with this - it captures the pathologies of access journalism precisely. I do think, however, that we shouldn’t focus solely on the opportunistic nature, as ideology always defines the limits of opportunism. The person who wrote this piece can’t be fully agnostic.
This, exactly - and these centrists receive active support from journalists who are fully on board with the project of fighting back against the “radical,” “woke” forces that have supposedly advanced too far in the Democratic Party in particular and American life in general.
Read 8 tweets
Feb 19
If anything, I think @sandylocks is being too generous here. It’s hard to see how what we’re witnessing now would have been possible without too many people on the center not just trying to duck away, but actively helping to legitimize the white reactionary counter-mobilization.
A concrete example for what @sandylocks rightfully calls media complicity in this short thread below - absolutely no journalistic justification for the WaPo to publish such bad-faith / illiterate nonsense.

In other words: The center very much didn’t hold.
“I defended the crusade against CRT, but I want nothing to do with these authoritarian education bills” is really not a credible position. It was never difficult to discern the white reactionary political project behind the anti-“CRT” moral panic, and what its end goal would be.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 17
I guess when you’re convinced to be fighting a noble war to defend “real” (read: white Christian patriarchal) America against the insidious forces of leftism and “wokeism,” it all makes perfect sense!
It’s worth reflecting on why so few people on the Right consider these inconsistencies a serious problem, and why they’re evidently not a dealbreaker for most conservatives, neither intellectually nor politically. It’s all about what rightwingers consider the “Higher Truths.”
These Higher Truths to which conservatives subscribe: That “real Americans” are being victimized constantly, made to suffer under the yoke of crazy leftist politics; that woke Libs are out to destroy “real” America; that “We” are entitled to rule, and “They” must be stopped.
Read 13 tweets
Feb 15
This may sound harsh, but I agree with @jasonintrator. Too many commentators thought their expertise on European fascism enabled them to weigh in on Trumpism, not realizing that they actually lacked an adequate understanding of the American (Far) Right, past and present.
One such case is Richard Evans, specifically his essay “Why Trump isn’t a fascist,” published a week after the January 6 attack on the Capitol. newstatesman.com/long-reads/202…
Richard Evans is one of the pre-eminent scholars of Nazism – and arguably one of the best-known historians in the world. I respect him greatly, especially his earlier work that focused on nineteenth-century German social history; the focus on Nazism actually came quite late.
Read 22 tweets
Feb 15
You know what Yascha Mounk conveniently fails to mention? That he also called for an end to “hygiene theater” in May 2021 – that was before Delta, before Omicron. About 350,000 Americans have since died of Covid.

Something to keep in mind when assessing his credibility.
You’d think that including some form of acknowledgment of his previous calls to “end pandemic theater” might be in order? Something like “Mind you, I also proudly proclaimed the exact same thing many months ago, and that was clearly premature”? Some critical self-reflection?
It’s the complete lack of humility that I find astonishing. “I used my significant public platform once before to deride people who remained cautious, including pretty much all the actual experts - they were right, I was wrong, many people died, but hey, no hard feelings, right?”
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(