1/ MPs today debated a pensions bill with a dangerous amendment proposed by discredited ex-Minister Robert Jenrick MP. Unfortunately the amendment was carried, with potentially serious impact on struggles for human rights and climate justice. Our briefing: palestinecampaign.org/briefing-note-…
2/ Jenrick’s amendment may be weaponised against those raising concerns about pension investments in companies involved in human rights abuse and environmental abuse. It seeks to prevent local authorities from exercising their legal right to make ethical investment choices.
3/ For example: it could force them to remain invested in companies involved in illegal settlements in occupied Palestine or Western Sahara; firms implicated in the oppression of Uyghur communities in China; those selling arms used in military attacks on civilians in Yemen.
4/ It’s not the first time anti-BDS policy has been proposed in the UK. Last time, PSC took the government to court - and we won!
The Supreme Court ruled on the exact issue that is being discussed. Jenrick’s amendment seeks to overturn that decision.
5/ Others have also raised concern about Jenrick’s amendment: @amnesty & @hrw have both warned of the chilling effect it could have on local authorities making investment decisions.
6/ The broader context is important: Jenrick has proposed the amendment as a blunt tool to attack Palestinian rights, boasting to the press about how he wants to outlaw BDS. This is a nasty enough objective, but who else will he take down in his anti-Palestinian rampage?
7/ References have been made to the government’s intention to introduce legislation against BDS in the coming months. Similar to this amendment, the implications will be devastating for Palestinian rights and well beyond. We wrote about it here: jacobinmag.com/2022/02/uk-ant…
8/ The level of disinformation coming from MPs about BDS is truly alarming. BDS is a set of time-honoured campaigning tactics, rooted in universal principles of accountability and justice, used by human rights & climate justice campaigners around the world, throughout history.
9/ While the govt is trumpeting its opposition to illegal occupations and support for int law its support for Jenrick’s amendment exposes the hollow rhetoric.
The UK govt & all public authorities must stand against military occupation and human rights abuses everywhere.
10/ Jenrick’s amendment is designed, above all, to make public bodies fearful acting in accordance with international law, if that action supports the rights of Palestinians.
11/ This is despite the UK Government's own position that Israel is in violation of international law. Pension schemes should divest from companies involved in illegal activity, and are legally entitled to do so.
12/ We at Palestine Solidarity Campaign will challenge any attempt to use this amendment to prevent pension schemes making ethical investment decisions.
We won at the Supreme Court before, and will win again.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Right now, 500 Palestinian political prisoners are undertaking a "mass united resistance movement" against administrative detention through a boycott of Israel's military courts. Read about it in this letter penned from inside Israel's apartheid jails: addameer.org/index.php/news…
2/ Administrative detention is an Israeli policy by which Palestinians are imprisoned indefinitely, without charge or trial, on secret evidence. It's a form of arbitrary detention, one element of apartheid, as recently described by @amnesty. amnesty.org/en/latest/news…
3/ Israel’s use of administrative detention is increasing alongside broader repression of Palestinians, criminalised for calling out injustice, and for raising the call for freedom. NGOs like @Addameer are targeted over human rights work. #StandWithThe6palcivilsociety.com
But Young Labour were definitively told not to have PSC speak at a meeting because a senior figure feared support for BDS might fall foul of the IHRA definition. Yesterday after interventions by Young Labour and PSC, Young Labour were given a full apology...
And confirmation that of course PSC could be invited to speak at their meeting.
So the issue is resolved… But as our statement makes clear, this is yet further evidence of how the IHRA is being used to create a cloud of suspicion around legitimate activism for Palestine.
Just to confirm, PSC will have its usual stall at the Labour Party conference and a meeting at the Fringe. We will also be taking part in the Youth Rising for Palestine @TWT_NOW event on September 28th with @YoungLabourUK.
PSC speakers will also be speaking at other events on Palestine at the conference.
However, it is also correct that an official within the Party has told Young Labour not to have a PSC speaker at a proposed event.
Meetings are taking place today to address this and we will make a fuller statement once the issue is resolved.
In the meantime, if you are attending the conference make sure to attend our fringe event “Justice for Palestine”➡️bit.ly/PSCLabourFringe
In an article in @JewishChron last Thursday, Dave Rich deliberately misconstrued PSC’s position on the IHRA in order to reinforce his false assertion that the IHRA definition isn’t being used to suppress campaigning for Palestinian rights. (1/12)
PSC wrote to @JewishChron requesting a right of reply and a correction. This has been refused. We will be pursuing this and in the meantime, let’s deal with the facts. (2/12)
There are many examples of the IHRA acting to suppress activism for Palestinian rights.
In a House of Lords debate this week on antisemitism in universities, John Mann, government advisor on antisemitism, made the spurious claim that there are no examples of the IHRA definition being used to suppress free speech. (1/14)
Even more outlandishly, he sought to cite PSC as a source for this assertion. He further framed the myriad of eminent bodies and individuals who have raised serious concerns about the IHRA’s threat to free speech and to legitimate critique... (2/14)
...of Israel's oppression of the Palestinian people as “some maverick academics.”
Facts are not a currency in which John Mann deals, but here are some helpful ones. (3/14)