We have an exciting announcement today here at @nuclearban. We all know that academic & policy research on nuclear weapons is often dominated (and often funded) by supporters of nuclear weapons, and fails to reflect a diversity of perspectives from around the world.
That's why we will provide research grants on issues like nuclear disarmament, public opinion & nuclear weapons, humanitarian & environmental impacts of nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons intersectionality, climate change & nuclear weapons, & international law such as the #TPNW
Research grants will range from 5’000-10’000 CHF, is open to scholars with a range of education and experience and can cover different types of research and publication activities. Read more here: icanw.org/call_for_propo…
We are particularly encouraging applicants of colour, indigenous applicants, applicants that identify as LGBQTI+SB, applicants with disabilities and applicants from communities harmed by nuclear weapons.
We're really excited to see fresh new perspectives to the issue and hope this research will be useful for advocates and practitioners to advance towards a nuclear-weapon-free world. Have questions? Ask @azakre or me!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Civil society is being shut out from the NPT Review Conference in January. While the risk of nuclear weapons use is rising, the UN & the President of the NPT decide to exclude experts, scientists & survivors from these important multilateral nuclear weapons talks.
This is not surprising though. The pandemic has been used by many governments as an excuse to silence civil society and NGOs. It is unacceptable that the United Nations, the SG, governments and the President of the NPT Review Conference let it continue to happen.
Civil society participation is about democracy, transparency and accountability, something this is extra important when it comes to decisions on matters that literally could end our world as we know it. Without civil society present at the NPT RevCon, the outcome will suffer.
It's heartbreaking to see what happens in Afghanistan now. It doesn't help the people there now to argue who was right, but I do wish we'd start listening more to those that warned about this & less on those that always support war even though it rarely achieves peace & democracy
NGOs, humanitarian orgs & women activists often warn "don't start this war", "don't sell weapons to them", "the military wont solve this" but are ignored or dismissed as naive. But even after when they often are proved right, most continue to ignore or dismiss their voices.
It's infuriating that we systematically dismiss work such as supporting NGOs, building democratic institutions as "soft" when in reality it's military intervention, military spending & warfare that over and over fails and is a naive & irresponsible way to solve problems.
It’s good that we’re discussing who can make the decision to use nuclear weapons. But it’s unfortunate that the conversation still mostly ends when you reach the part where the nuclear weapons are launched - because that’s when the reality of nuclear weapons actually kicks in.
Once a nuclear bomb is launched, it will make its way towards its target. It will likely be delivered by a missile or dropped from a plane.
The target will be a populated area. Nuclear armed states keep saying that they’d act in line with the laws of war but that’s bullshit. Nuclear weapons are built to wipe out cities, they’re meant to mass murder as many civilians as possible. That’s their reason to exist.