People who are surprised that the GOP is siding with an autocratic dictator over Western democracy miss an important part of American history:
Autocracy is deep in our history.
A multi-racial democracy didn't come to America until recently.
Slavery was autocratic. . .
. . . Jim Crow was autocratic.
The GOP's pushback against America transitioning to a true multi-racial democracy goes hand-in-hand with supporting a dictator like Putin.
It's perfectly consistent.
Putin stages elections in which the result is known beforehand.
Members of the GOP were cool with fair elections when the choice was between two white men.
Now . . . not so much.
There's a theory on Twitter that goes like this: All was good until the GOP turned into a lawbreaking party.
Me =🤦♀️
(I can't fit the rebuttal to that in a Tweet, but I've written lots of threads countering that view with a history of our laws.)
In these books and elsewhere, @HC_Richardson explains that we've had two oligarchies and we're slipping toward a third.
The first was slavery when wealthy plantation owners—who were 1% of the population—controlled all three branches of government.
Next came the age of robber barons when industrialists had the power to exploit workers, manipulate markets, fix prices, grab women, and kill Black people who tried to vote.
That's the oligarchy the GOP wants to recreate.
That's what they mean by Make America great "again."
It is not a coincidence that Trump picked Paul Manafort to be his campaign chief.
Manafort worked for an anti-NATO party in Ukraine and supported a Russian puppet president who fled Ukraine amid charges of corruption and collusion with Russia. nbcnews.com/news/us-news/w…
Dropping this here, because I agree.
This is what the Republican Party supports.
They think Putin is "strong" and Biden is "weak."
Putin is pure, unmitigated evil. He doesn't care who gets hurt.
And here you have the leader of the Republican Party praising Putin as "smart" because Putin gets a whole country and he only has to pay $2 in sanctions.
Putin knows how to wield disinformation and he knows that the United States is divided: A large portion of the population, including the most influential voices from a major political party, want the United States to emulate his Russia.
After Russia enacted anti-homosexual legislation, Pat Buchanan said Putin was “entering a claim that Moscow is the Godly city of today" because he was stamping out western evils like easy divorce and homosexuality. buchanan.org/blog/whose-sid…
2/
British right-winger Katie Hopkins, in an article in which she was interviewed with her friend Ann Coulter, said “Putin rocks.”
Katie Hopkins then went on to praise Russia as being “untouched by the myth of multiculturalism and deranged diversity."
Um . . . this isn't the defense Trump thinks it is.
Trump published a letter he received from Mazars dated (it looks like) 2014. He then summarized the letter.
#1: What Mazars said
#2: What Trump says Mazars said
Me = 🤦♀️
Does he think nobody can or will actually read it?
Mazars said, "Trump is responsible for preparing the financial statement."
Also Mazars does not "undertake to obtain or provide any assurance that there are no material modifications that should be made . . . "
Trump posts the letter and says Mazars "strongly states that all work was performed in accordance with professional standards and that there were "no material discrepancies in the financial statements."
. . . and concluded with thoughts about how social media brings out authoritarian instincts in large swaths of people who ordinarily would not be given to authoritarian impulses.
Indicting people and having juries return "not guilty" verdicts because there isn't evidence to prove each element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt may not accomplish what people think it will accomplish.