I'll start with what we know about the Manhattan DA story.

The NYT reported that two prosecutors, Dunne and Pomerantz, resigned.

(The information in the article comes from “people with knowledge of the matter.”)

1/
Here's the NYT story: nytimes.com/2022/02/23/nyr…

Reportedly they resigned because Bragg, the Manhattan DH, has doubts about moving forward.

It also appears that Weisselberg will not cooperate (he won’t flip on Trump) and either will any other executives.

2/
Bragg doesn’t say much, but he says the investigation is “ongoing.” (Who knows what that means.)

We do know that Weisselberg and the Trump Org are indicted and set to go to trial.

One (very unlikely) possibility is that it's slam dunk case and Bragg got cold feet.

3/
I don't know much about Bragg, but I know prosecutors tend not to get cold feet when the case is slam dunk.

More likely: A difference of opinion.

We know that there is evidence that Trump himself committed crimes. But we don't know what witnesses are telling the grand jury.
4/
Here's something I learned from the Godfather: It's hard to get the don if the consigliere won't flip.

This is particularly true with an experienced mob boss who knows how to put layers of insulation between himself and the actual crime.

5/
Right. ⤵️

Someone is guilty.

This is possible: Weiselberg and the other executives are shielding Trump. Maybe Weisselberg is willing to take the fall.

6/
The Trump Org is under criminal indictment, so it's not like Trump skates here (unless a jury returns a verdict of not guilty).

Another possibility (that I think is unlikely): The grand jury is lukewarm on the evidence against Trump.

7/
I think people get confused between "copious evidence of fraud" and "enough evidence to convict person A of fraud" particularly if witnesses are shielding him.

See the difference?

The Trump Org and the CFO have been indicted.

About evidence . . .

8/

I haven't seen the evidence so I can't tell you what the witnesses are saying or why (if it's true) Bragg got cold feet.

But there are different levels of evidence required for different kinds of proceedings.

Criminal proceedings have the highest standards.

9/
Each element of a crime has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Someone asked about the case with Letitia James (I can't find the comment.) That's ongoing with a lower standard of proof.

Bragg will have to answer to voters, so I assume we'll learn more.

10/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

Feb 23
People who are surprised that the GOP is siding with an autocratic dictator over Western democracy miss an important part of American history:
Autocracy is deep in our history.

A multi-racial democracy didn't come to America until recently.

Slavery was autocratic. . .
. . . Jim Crow was autocratic.

The GOP's pushback against America transitioning to a true multi-racial democracy goes hand-in-hand with supporting a dictator like Putin.

It's perfectly consistent.
Putin stages elections in which the result is known beforehand.

Members of the GOP were cool with fair elections when the choice was between two white men.

Now . . . not so much.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 21
Putin knows how to wield disinformation and he knows that the United States is divided: A large portion of the population, including the most influential voices from a major political party, want the United States to emulate his Russia.

1/
Some background:

After Russia enacted anti-homosexual legislation, Pat Buchanan said Putin was “entering a claim that Moscow is the Godly city of today" because he was stamping out western evils like easy divorce and homosexuality.
buchanan.org/blog/whose-sid…

2/
British right-winger Katie Hopkins, in an article in which she was interviewed with her friend Ann Coulter, said “Putin rocks.”

Katie Hopkins then went on to praise Russia as being “untouched by the myth of multiculturalism and deranged diversity."

rt.com/uk/429777-kati…

3/
Read 4 tweets
Feb 18
Trump lost in court THREE MORE TIMES today.

Trump tried to get all three of these cases⤵️ dismissed and lost. I analyzed one of the cases last April, Blassingame, here: (Transcript on my blog.)

He tends not to do well in court, where facts matter.

1/
The defendants made the following arguments (screenshot #1)

Trump also claims, among other things, that he has absolute immunity. (#2)

It turns out that the absolute immunity question isn't as easy as you might think (but Trump still lost).

2/
If you want to get caught up on one of the cases, my analysis from last April is here:terikanefield.com/blassingame-v-…

And here:

You can read the court's decision here: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

3/
Read 8 tweets
Feb 16
Um . . . this isn't the defense Trump thinks it is.

Trump published a letter he received from Mazars dated (it looks like) 2014. He then summarized the letter.

#1: What Mazars said
#2: What Trump says Mazars said

Me = 🤦‍♀️

Does he think nobody can or will actually read it?
Mazars said, "Trump is responsible for preparing the financial statement."

Also Mazars does not "undertake to obtain or provide any assurance that there are no material modifications that should be made . . . "
Trump posts the letter and says Mazars "strongly states that all work was performed in accordance with professional standards and that there were "no material discrepancies in the financial statements."

There is no "I don't know how to read" defense.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 13
For this week’s blog post, I edited and combined a few of my recent threads.

I started with a reading of the newly unredacted sections of the Mueller report, then talked about some of the responses on Twitter . . .

terikanefield.com/is-social-medi…
. . . and concluded with thoughts about how social media brings out authoritarian instincts in large swaths of people who ordinarily would not be given to authoritarian impulses.



It's too easy for truth to lose, and when truth loses, democracy loses.
Right. And not all "manipulators" are bad actors, but all people need to learn to evaluate sources.

Reflectively saying, "Professor X should know" is not how to do it. It takes more work. Falling in line is always easier than doing the work.

Read 4 tweets
Feb 12
I'm tired of the word "accountable." It's a weasel word. Don't say "accountable." Say what you mean.

Does "accountable" mean
🔹Lose elections?
🔹Go to prison?
🔹Lose a lawsuit?
🔹Be hated?

It would be nice if all the good people were rewarded and the bad people punished.
So you want to start indicting people and gather the evidence after they're indicted?

Or not worry about evidence?

There are rules of evidence, which means that the stuff you've read in newspapers and Tweets probably isn't admissible in court . . .
Indicting people and having juries return "not guilty" verdicts because there isn't evidence to prove each element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt may not accomplish what people think it will accomplish.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(