Let's say you want to see if your students have done the reading. Surveilling student behavior in a social annotation tool is not the way! Here's a quick thread on ways you *can* tell if students have done the reading that's not conducted in the spirit of policing. (1/6)
Note: students prob won't be all that motivated to do the reading if they don't have a clear purpose for doing so. So, be explicit about the reading task: are they reading for content? Are they reading it to understand the genre (i.e. to understand a scientific paper)? Why read?
#1: Try a "3-2-1" exercise where students identify 3 moments in the reading they found interesting, 2 they found confusing/unclear, and 1 question they had after finishing. It's a simple exercise, but invites students to consider their responses in multiple ways. (2/6)
#2: Ask students to contribute to a digital pinboard of fav quotes from the reading. You could set a number around the minimum amount of contributions (a clear task often helps). Call it your class scrapbook. Use the "scrapbook" as a launch point for discussion. (3/6)
#3: Try asking students to respond to the reading with GIFs, emojis, or images rather than text. What are their reactions to particular moments in the reading? If they had to create an "Instagram story" of their favorite reading moments, what would it look like? (4/6)
#4: If the reading is super long and complicated, divide it into chunks. Assign different chunks to different people in the class. Then, do a jigsaw-style activity where students who read different sections are clustered together and they teach each other what they read. (5/6)
Just a few starting ideas that aren't "read and reflect" or "read and post a discussion board post" or "let me 'catch you' if you didn't happen to click on the reading I posted in the LMS." There's more where all of this came from: wvupressonline.com/node/865 (6/6)
Oh, and a thought I'd be remiss not to mention: if you want students to be looking for one specific thing in a reading (a definition, an understanding of a process, some historical context), tell them! Transparency is a good thing, and it'll help strengthen reading acumen.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've experienced a few weeks of hybrid workshops/classes/meetings and there are really just 6 things everyone could do to make mixed modality conversations work well. Sharing thoughts here.
Spoilers: it's kind of about the tech, but it's a lot more about the behavior. (1/8)
NB: I'm referring to "hybrid" to mean simultaneously in-person and online participants for synchronous/real-time conversations. Lots of very legit concerns with this modality, but since it's happening regardless, it's worth thinking about how to make it better. (2/8)
#1: Learn as much as you can about whatever video-conferencing program you're using for online participants. That means practicing on your own things like sharing the screen, picking an audio/video source, and putting links/resources into the chat. That's your home base. (3/8).
Seeing the classroom laptop ban debate rear its head again, it's worth noting that somehow after a YEAR+ of remote teaching, we're still struggling to think creatively & inclusively about how tech is PART of a learning enviro, not separate from it. Some quick thoughts (1/6)
Given the ubiquity of mobile device ownership, (I often cite 2018 @educause data here that 97% of students use mobile phones for learning) ignoring or banning the presence of these devices is ignoring an opportunity that we can leverage for learning. (2/6)
Is there potential for distraction? Of course there is. But is there also potential to encourage directed, mindful usage of Web browsing, archivable/searchable/taggable note-taking, and back-channel chatting to enhance & create more channels for discussion? Yes! (3/6)
I've been thinking a bit about the collective panic many folks experienced with Zoom's outage yesterday. Understandably, it's stressful when infrastructures that we rely upon fail! The problem is that we're still relying upon thinking of Zoom as the classroom. It's not. (1/x)
Zoom is part of the classroom. Think of it as the table where everyone gathers around or the small tables for breakout rooms. To run a successful class, you would never just rely upon the furniture in your f2f classroom. You likely had handouts, books, videos, resources. (2/x)
Sure, the furniture shaped what kinds of interactions were possible f2f, just as Zoom shapes the interactions possible online. But teachers have long found creative workarounds for chairs mounted in the ground. If we can bring that same spirit of experimentation to online.. (3/x)
Instead of reading That Article getting circulated about how online learning is inferior to f2f, maybe check out some vetted resources from online learning experts, which will help you craft engaging, thoughtful, and active learning for your students? A thread.
@MERLOTorg could truly be a one-stop shop for online teaching and learning resources. There are tremendous databases you can peruse, vetted by experts with articles and teaching guides across the disciplines.
@educause has been publishing cutting-edge, engaged research on digital learning for years. If you're not already reading @EDUCAUSEreview for informed opinions or checking out their internal research, then you're missing out on thoughtful work!
I've been doing lots of faculty workshops about teaching online this past week. I'll share what I'm learning from supporting instructors that might be useful to the #highered twitterverse. I'll preface w/ the fact that instructors are MOST concerned about their students. (THREAD)
2. The compassion instructors have for their students is really heartening, and it also speaks to the need to share some data with instructors about student tech access and usage. I've been trying to share @educause's great articles, like er.educause.edu/blogs/2020/3/s…
3. Many instructors are worried about basic tech literacy & the ability to adopt new solutions fast. I don't have good answers for this other than "start small" or "pick one thing and learn how to do what you can with that one thing." I've most often been sending folks to the LMS
Here's an off-the-dome response to @tristanharris's recent pitch for @HumaneTech_. Here, I question the assumption that distraction is our biggest problem to solve in tech (and edtech) and, instead, urge us to pivot to equity issues that loom much larger. jenaecohn.net/2019/04/24/dis…
With thanks to really helpful threads from @ruchowdh, @npseaver, @hypervisible, @libshipwreck for helping me wrap my head around some of these ideas. I still have a lot to learn in this space, but felt compelled to say something about what it means to be a humane technologist.
Some shout-outs in this blog also go to @stevendkrause and his great work happening around MOOCs, @datasociety and a recent blog post from fellow @mutalenkonde about the need for public interest technologists. There are a lot of really, really good people doing the work out here.