Some current pandemic facts, uncertainties, and phrases/statements people are linking by association to changes in public health measures. (1/11)
We are still in a pandemic. Yes, it’s true. A virus capable of causing illness and death in a significant proportion of the population is still circulating in all countries. (2/11)
FACT: This virus is still changing quite quickly and unpredictably. Not just to ‘milder’, and not always to versions where previous vaccine or exposure related immunity are effective (although looks like some cross protection against current circulating omicron strains 😃) (3/11)
FACT: A rapidly changing, unstable virus limits our ability to adequately predict pathogenicity and transmission. That’s a problem when still building the depth of immunity needed for strong protection over multiple seasons of combined post-exposure and vaccine immunity. (4/11)
FACT: We have tools that enable safer pandemic living until we reduce uncertainty around viral trajectory. They include, but are not limited to, vaccines. Better ventilation, masks when indoors, and enhanced self testing for the vulnerable and those around them are also key (5/11
FACT: masks mitigate transmission and do not preclude gathering or daily living. There are no data that masks cause economic harm in any sector, but emerging data that removing them unfairly places a burden of isolation on the vulnerable. (6/11)
HIGH UNCERTAINTY: the impact of removing all public health measures (especially without real support for sick pay) on absenteeism, population wellness, and chronic illness beyond ‘just’ hospitalization and death (7/11)
UNCERTAINTY: ability to predict viral evolution in next 4-6 months in an unchecked environment with an evolving ecologic and immunologic niche. The virus-host interaction is not clearly decided yet (and it will be late before we see ‘worse’ virus in a precaution free world)(8/11)
Statements that are not a rationale for viral pandemic response, but instead are tag lines: ‘we must learn to live with this’; ‘we cannot live in fear’; ‘we must move forward’; ‘people are done with the pandemic’ (9/11)
Saying the statements in tweet 9/11 next to ‘and therefore we need to remove masks and access to voluntary testing’ doesn’t actually mean it’s a valid reason. Yes, people may be ‘done’, but true leaders can inspire and motivate and make sure there is equity in responses. (10/11)
With current viral uncertainty, known benefits of masking, as well as the relative lack of economic or societal harm, we ask our vulnerable to maybe assume too much risk to convenience the rest of us if removed in the next months. Worth a solid reflection Canada. (11/11)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People keep throwing their hands up and say ‘this is going to continue forever!!
Why do I say things will very likely be significantly different / better after this spring? Several key things:
1. Children will have the opportunity to be vaccinated, taking away a large group of immunologically naive people that cohort together socially.
2. We will have been through a fairly fulsome period of population exposure that will add dimension to population immunity
Here’s a phrase we need to start familiarizing ourselves with (again, for those of us around long enough): community viral load. There are times when it matters how much asymptomatic virus is around even if not causing disease.
Community viral load refers to the overall level of virus in a community, regardless (and perhaps especially if it doesn’t cause) symptoms. It’s Impt when there are discrete groups of susceptible individuals ESPECIALLY with no symptom infections. Gets away from each case.
Why know the term? Because we have a cohorted group of unvaccinated individuals, there are vulnerable vaccinated, and this particular virus is aggressive clinically and transmission wise. That is to say….
Why am I such a proponent of limiting virus for the next few months instead of going for a ‘usual respiratory virus’ plan? To be clear, I want to limit virus but not people. But too early for respiratory virus ‘business as usual’ yet. @PHAC_GC@JustinTrudeau
1. We have amazing tools for COVID prevention beyond isolation and lockdown. Broad and innovative implementation of rapid tests, basic respiratory hygiene, and masks are easy, socially enably tools that work. Paid sick days also extremely important.
2. There’s some reasonable signal that even those who don’t become extremely ill may have long term sequelae. We don’t fully know or understand this, but it does seem more marked and present than with other respiratory viruses.
Nova Scotia: public health may be a little longer getting in touch with people for the next few days. They are really and truly doing an amazing job but there is some trouble getting everything done quickly right now.
As Nova Scotians, we can help them and each other get this COVID-21 controlled.
Please don’t get frustrated, upset or angry. (Well, you can, it’s been a long year) BUT here are some ways to take control and be proactive!!
We NEED you NOW Nova Scotia!
1. If you have symptoms, don’t wait, not even a day! Get tested at a Nova Scotia Health authority testing site (NOT a pop up site!!). You are NOT putting a strain on the system. You are doing the right thing.