Wokal Distance Profile picture
Feb 24, 2022 24 tweets 5 min read Read on X
1/
Let's talk about why Putin is doing what he's doing.
To understand Putin, we need to understand how Putin sees the world, how he was trained, and what drives him.

To do that we need to unpack a some history so we can put Putin in the context that allows us to understand him.
2/
First off, Putin was a KGB agent. For those of you that don't know the KGB was the Main security agency in Soviet Union. It dealt with internal security, intelligence and secret police functions.

It's isn't exactly this, but imagine combining the FBI and CIA...that's the KGB
3/
The KGB did intelligence work at home and abroad. Internally the KGB would MONITOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPINION, internal subversion, and any revolutionary plots in the Soviet Bloc. The KGB would spy on Soviet citizens and was in charge of stomping out dissent within the USSR...
4/
So the KGB played the role of ensuring there would be no dissent at home, and would engage in intelligence gathering, disinformation, subversion, and espionage abroad.

Again, like the CIA and FBI combined, but communist and with almost no due process for those it arrested...
5/
Now, where the KGB was the security agency, the Politburo was the political power in the USSR. There was a rather convoluted structure to the USSR, but the fact is the Politburo of the Communist Party was in fact the ruling body and the center of political power in the USSR...
6/
The head of the politburo was the "General Secretary" and the General Secretary was the De facto Leader of the USSR occupying a similar role to the President in America, or the Prime Minister in Britain (again, not exactly, approximately)

Got all that? Good, Let's continue...
7/
So, for most of the Soviet Unions history, no former head of the KGB had ever been able to become General Secretary. The reason for this was that after Stalin Died Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev gave a speech called On the Cult of Personality and Its Consequences"...
8/
Which lambasted Joseph Stalin's leadership, and the Cult of Personality he had created around himself. After that, Soviets were wary of giving one man too much power. They knew a former head of the KGB being General Secretary would have the loyalty of the security apparatus...
9/
And making that person the General Secretary would make them unstopable as there would be no mechanism available to check their power. It would be another Stalin.

Got all that? Ok, so here is where we get back to Putin...
10/
Remember that in 1975 Putin goes to work for the KGB.

In 1982 the Soviets go against their previous thinking, and they select former head of the KGB, Yuri Andropov, to be the General Secretary of the politburo and de facto leader of the USSR.

According to Ion Mihai Pacepa
11/
"the leaders of the former Warsaw Pact intelligence community, when I was one of them, looked up to Andropov as the man who substituted the KGB for the Communist party in governing the Soviet Union."

Andropov shifted the influence away from the politburo and to the KGB...
12/
(Ion Mihai Pacepa was a subordinate of Andropov)

So, while this happened, Vladimir Putin would have been watching it, and he would have been aware of what was going on. Not "as it happened" (there was no internet and Soviets always were delaying information) but...
13/
He would have had something of an inside view of what Andropov was doing, and why, why it was effective, and how Andropov was able to get power and maintain it.

Hold that thought while I make one other point and then we can wrap this up....
14/
When Putin was in the KGB the Soviet Union was a world power, and the Soviets were seen as on of twosuperpowers in the world along with the united States. At that time, is was not clear which power would come out on top. (in retrospect it's obvious, at the time it wasn't)
15/
At that time the soviets were feared and respected, had absolute dominance in their region of the world, and could exercise influence all over the world.

This is what Putin wants.

Putin wants to return Russia to it's place of respect, power, and prestige on the world stage.
16/
He sees the dissolution of the USSR as a mistake. When the USSR dissolved the direct influence the USSR maintained over it's satellite states (such as Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia and East Germany) was lost, and the power of Russia was diminished...
17/
He wants to return Russia to it's former glory.

But, as we have seen, he has learned his lessons from watching the Old Soviet Union, and from his training as a KGB officer. As such Putin uses thuggery, espionage, deceit, disinformation, and subversion as his tactics...
18/
So it should surprise us not at all that Putin would invade one of the old territories of the USSR, particularly when he has a lot to gain if he can get it and keep it.

This is exactly what we should expect from him. After all, the USSR would regularly engage in exactly...
19/
This sort of expansionist behavior. We should expect this from Putin.

Further Putin has been telegraphing his nostalgia for the USSR for some time. The Russian hockey team was wearing the Jersey's of the USSR at a tournament in Moscow this past December.

That's not a fluke Image
20/
Putin is pulling out the old Soviet playbook in a bid to bring Russia back to prestige and prominence.
Putin may not subscribe to old Soviet Communist ideology. I am not entirely sure. What I am sure of is that Putin is an authoritarian thug who needs to be countered...
21/
Whether or not the west has the spine to do that is an open question. But we have seen this all before, and we ought not to be surprised that Putin would do this. His history practically begs us to think this is exactly what he would do.

One last thing....
22/
This thread, and it's ideas are not my own. I am not expert in Putin or Russia, but people who know much more then I do have relayed this to me, and I am relaying it to you.

I think it is spot on.

/fin.
PS/
I should add, because I forgot to make this clear in the original thread:

Putin doesn't want Russia's power and prestige back because it makes the lives of ordinary Russians better. He wants Russia's prestige and prominence back for his own aggrendizement and personal power
PPS/
This isn't a selfless thing for the glory of Mother Russia...it's about the selfish glory of Putin.

Regular Russians will suffer greatly so that Putin can increase his own power and sense of self importance on the world stage.

/fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Wokal Distance

Wokal Distance Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wokal_distance

Sep 26
Since "noticing" appears to be a thing, I'd like to say that I "notice" things as well....And I can't help but *notice* the obsession that certain people have with Israel, even though other nations (China, India, Russia, etc) impact the U.S. far more....
I also can't help but notice that those same sorts of people are obsessed the influence of wealth Jews, but have nothing to say about the influence of money from China, Qatar, Russia, India, and so on.

The Jews are, apparantly, an item of incredibly deep concern...
For a great number of people, and I can't help but *notice* that the far greater and more pernicious influence (and subversion) coming from foreign money in other countries gets mysteriously ignored, and I *notice* that Israel is held to a higher standard than every other country
Read 4 tweets
Sep 25
1/
Wokeness is the alloy of the political ideology and moral value framework from Critical Theory with the social constructivist worldview and epistemology of postmodernism.

As the political side of woke recedes culturally, it leaves behind the underlying postmodern worldview.
2/ The teleology of the woke project came from the moral commitments of intersectional social justice (Trans-rights, Race based activism, etc)

Those movements are being dissolved by their own incoherence and absurdity (Land acknowledgements, claiming men can become women, etc)
3/
The dissolution and exhaustion of the political movement that provided the teleology and moral value framework for wokeness leaves the entire social movement around which those things were built without any thing to serve as locus for meaning, purpose, or values.
Read 7 tweets
Sep 24
The left created an epitemic bubble which filters out everything that challenges their narrative while promoting anything that confirms their priors

It's socially enforced confirmation bias at scale which results in the left having no idea what anyone outside their bubble thinks
The left has what @wesyang calls a "Vertically Integrated Messaging Apparatus." It's an apparatus of messaging distribution which is owned and operated by leftists top to bottom, and disseminates only the information which aligns with leftist moral norms and political priorities.
@wesyang The lefts messaging apparatus used to be the information distributor for all of society (we called it "mainstream media") but new media alternatives and the rollback of social media censorship regime's mean society is no longer a captive audience for the lefts messaging apparatus
Read 12 tweets
Sep 23
For decades it was the progressive leftist worldview from which the norms of public life and the values of the common culture were derived. The at-large culture was the home of leftists, and conservative evangelicals were treated like unwanted guests.

Those days are over.
The culture is changing so quickly that people are about to get whiplash. It's no longer the case that the default values of public life are those of the social-justice left, (or of "progressives") and progressives no longer get to determine what is allowed in "polite company."
In other words, the progressives no longer get to simply assume that their goals, values, and priorities get to take center stage in the at-large culture.

The presumption of progressive leftists that they get to set the terms of the debate no longer carries any weight.
Read 10 tweets
Sep 20
For years conservatives told people that leftists used violence and intimidation to silence dissent, and the media downplays and ignores it. Charlie Kirk's assassination proved the right was correct, and gave them the moral high ground in the culture for the first time in decades
Kirks' assassination validated what the right had been saying about free speech, censorship, and political violence exactly because Charlie was a vigorous free speech advocate who was killed for his speech.

Free speech is therefore the root of the rights' moral highground...
This means the right now has the backing of the culture, and the culture largely *agrees* with what the right has been saying about free speech, cancel culture, intimidation, censorship, information supression, and so fourth.

The cultural shift is real.
Read 15 tweets
Sep 19
Any leftist podcaster or celebrity can hold an event at any University in the United States with minimal security and be completely safe.

Conservative speakers can't hold events on campus without armed guards and a bullet proof vest.

Let's talk about why🧵
Universities have basically said there is no penalty for *trying* to do violence against conservatives; there's only a penalty if you actually manage to injure one of them.

You can try to do violence as much as you like, and there's no penalty until you actually hurt somone.
It's like telling a man with a loaded gun "shoot as many bullets at people as you like — we won't stop you until you actually hit someone."

This is the logic universities use when responding to the threats, protests, and riots the left uses to intimidate and shut down speakers.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(